Back to blog
Research

How to Mine Alt Coins: Complete Guide for Beginners in 2025

Mining altcoins in 2025 provides accessible entry points for those willing to research, invest wisely, and manage operations carefully.
Token Metrics Team
6 min
Want Smarter Crypto Picks—Free?
See unbiased Token Metrics Ratings for BTC, ETH, and top alts.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
 No credit card | 1-click unsubscribe

While Bitcoin mining is now largely dominated by massive industrial setups using specialized hardware, mining altcoins still presents accessible opportunities for home miners. At home miners, who use personal hardware such as GPUs, CPUs, or ASICs from their residences, face unique challenges and opportunities, such as joining mining pools or selecting ASIC-resistant coins to remain competitive. With application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) devices making Bitcoin mining increasingly challenging for individuals, alternative cryptocurrencies offer a viable path for crypto enthusiasts to begin mining using standard equipment and earn rewards from their home computer. The difficulty of mining altcoins varies according to the network’s mining difficulty factor, which adjusts based on total computational power; higher computing power generally leads to increased mining output and better performance. Mining cryptocurrencies refers to the broader activity of validating transactions and securing various digital assets through computational work. Mining bitcoin, in particular, has become highly competitive and requires significant investment in specialized hardware, making it less viable for most individuals. Mining cryptocurrency is the process of creating new digital coins by solving cryptographic puzzles, with miners earning rewards for their efforts.

Although the cryptocurrency mining landscape has changed dramatically, altcoin mining remains one of the most practical ways for newcomers to enter the digital currency world. The mining process typically involves selecting a coin, setting up mining software, configuring your hardware, and joining a mining pool to maximize efficiency. Before getting started mining, beginners should consider factors such as hardware costs, electricity consumption, and potential profitability. Different coins may require different types of mining rigs or software, so it’s important to tailor your setup to the specific cryptocurrency you wish to mine. This detailed guide covers everything you need to know about mining altcoins, from choosing suitable mining hardware to assessing profitability and expanding your mining setup. To start mining altcoins, you’ll require specific equipment called mining rigs, designed to handle the complex computations necessary for mining.

What Are Alt Coins and Why Mine Them?

Altcoins are any cryptocurrencies other than Bitcoin. This term includes thousands of projects, ranging from established networks such as Ethereum Classic and Zcash to newer tokens with unique features. These coins often differentiate themselves by varying parameters like block times, hashing algorithms, and consensus protocols. In addition to these, there are many other cryptocurrencies that can be mined, offering a wide variety of options for home miners.

Over time, Bitcoin mining has shifted from being accessible to individuals with common hardware to being almost entirely controlled by ASIC miners. These specialized machines are specifically designed for mining certain cryptocurrencies, greatly outperforming regular hardware. Some mining software is also specifically designed to maximize efficiency for particular coins. As a result, solo Bitcoin mining is largely unprofitable for home miners. Conversely, many altcoins are ASIC-resistant by employing algorithms that favor consumer-grade hardware like CPUs and GPUs.

Mining altcoins has several advantages:

  • Lower entry barriers: Many altcoins have fewer miners and thus lower mining difficulty, making it easier for individuals to discover blocks.
  • ASIC resistance: Coins like Monero and Ravencoin are designed to resist ASIC centralization, keeping mining feasible on consumer hardware.
  • Accessibility: Altcoin mining often can be done using standard graphics cards or even CPUs, lowering the initial investment.
  • Potential for higher returns: Early-stage or volatile altcoins may offer greater profit margins for agile miners due to rapid price movements and less competition. Choosing the most profitable crypto or another profitable crypto is crucial, as selecting the right coin and hardware can significantly impact your mining returns.

As of 2025, popular altcoins to mine include Monero (privacy-focused and ASIC-resistant), Ethereum Classic (supports both GPU and ASIC mining), Ravencoin (ASIC-resistant with asset transfer focus), and Zcash (privacy-focused with Equihash algorithm supporting GPU and ASIC mining). These are among the popular cryptocurrencies for home mining, but there are many others commonly mined as well.

Other notable examples include Litecoin (LTC), known for its fast transactions and Scrypt-based mining, and Dogecoin (DOGE), a meme-based cryptocurrency with a unique supply model and mining rewards. Both Litecoin and Dogecoin can be mined with hardware tailored to their specific algorithms, and are often mined together due to merged mining compatibility.

Mining cryptocurrencies is similar to extracting precious metals like gold or silver—while the tools and processes differ, both involve expending resources to obtain something valuable.

Essential Equipment for Altcoin Mining

Mining hardware generally falls into three categories, each with distinct benefits for cryptocurrency mining:

If you are starting on a budget, you might consider beginning with a single rig. However, one mining rig, even if it is a high-performance model, will have limited mining power compared to large mining pools or farms. To compete at scale or increase your chances of earning mining rewards, a significant amount of investment in multiple rigs and supporting infrastructure is often required.

When your hardware successfully mines a block, you receive reward tokens as compensation for your computational effort. These reward tokens represent the mined cryptocurrency and are the primary incentive for miners to participate in the network.

CPU Mining

Central Processing Units (CPUs) are the most basic mining hardware and are often already owned by users. CPUs typically mine less popular or highly ASIC-resistant coins like Monero. Although CPU mining has the lowest barrier to entry, it offers slower mining speeds and lower earning potential.

GPU Mining

Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) are the primary workhorses for consumer-level crypto mining. GPUs provide a balance of computational power, flexibility, and energy efficiency, making them suitable for coins like Ethereum Classic and Ravencoin. Effective GPU mining requires powerful graphics cards from manufacturers like NVIDIA and AMD. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and RTX 3080 are popular options for GPU mining, costing between $600 to over $2000. Top GPUs in 2025 include:

  • NVIDIA RTX 4090: Offering up to 130 MH/s on Ethash-based coins, it is the highest-performing consumer graphics card.
  • NVIDIA RTX 3080: Provides over 100 MH/s with excellent efficiency for many mining algorithms.
  • AMD RX 5700 XT: Capable of up to 55 MH/s with strong efficiency for KAWPOW mining.

ASIC Miners

Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) are highly efficient mining devices tailored for specific algorithms, often outperforming GPUs and CPUs. ASIC miners are pre-built mining rigs designed specifically for cryptocurrency mining. While ASIC miners deliver the highest processing power and mining speed, their use is limited to certain algorithms and they require a significant upfront investment. For example, the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19 XP costs approximately $4,600, highlighting the high entry cost for these devices.

Supporting Components

Building a mining rig requires additional hardware:

  • Motherboards: Should support multiple GPUs (typically 6-8 or more). Brands like ASUS and MSI provide mining-optimized options.
  • Power supplies: Typically sized between 1000W and 1600W for multi-GPU setups, with higher efficiency ratings (80 Plus Gold or better) helping reduce electricity costs.
  • Cooling systems: Effective cooling via fans, open-air frames, or liquid cooling prevents overheating, thermal throttling, and hardware damage.

Budget is a key consideration. Beginners might start with a single rig containing one or two GPUs ($400–$1000 each), while professional miners running 8 to 13 GPUs can expect total costs exceeding $10,000 after including motherboards, power supplies, and cooling. Mining rigs generate notable noise and heat during operation, which can impact living conditions and should be factored into setup decisions.

Setting Up Your Mining Software

Once hardware is assembled, configuring mining software is the next step. Mining software tailored for your chosen cryptocurrency is necessary for altcoin mining. Software choice depends on the coin and hardware:

Popular Mining Software

  • cgminer: Versatile and supports many SHA-based coins and GPU mining.
  • cudaminer: Optimized for NVIDIA GPUs across various algorithms.
  • MultiMiner: User-friendly interface ideal for beginners.
  • xmrig: Preferred for Monero and CPU mining.

Operating Systems

Windows offers user-friendly setup, broad hardware support, and easy overclocking tools, suitable for beginners and small operations. However, it may be less stable for large-scale mining and requires licensing.

Linux is favored for high-uptime, headless rigs, especially with more than 8 GPUs, due to superior resource management and being free of cost. Many miners choose Linux when scaling beyond basic home setups.

Configuration Essentials

Miners must configure software with their cryptocurrency wallet address, mining algorithm, and mining pool connection details for pool mining. Custom scripts (.bat or .sh files) are commonly used to optimize mining sessions.

Setting up a wallet is crucial to receive mining rewards. Options include official wallets, third-party wallets (Exodus, Atomic Wallet), or hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor). Using cold storage wallets to keep keys offline enhances security against online threats.

Top Altcoins to Mine in 2025

Joining Mining Pools for Better Returns

Solo mining is rarely practical for altcoins due to the randomness of block discovery. Mining pools combine computational power from many miners to smooth out returns, distributing rewards proportionally based on contributed work. Joining a mining pool increases your chances of solving cryptographic puzzles and earning rewards, making pool mining popular.

Popular Mining Pools

Choosing the right pool affects earnings and experience:

  • MultiPool: Supports many altcoins with automatic switching to the most profitable.
  • bytecoin-pool.org: Focused on privacy coins.
  • Coin-specific pools: Many altcoins have dedicated pools with lower fees and strong communities.

Pool fees typically range from 0.5% to 2%. Payout methods include:

  • PPS (Pay Per Share): Predictable returns with guaranteed payments.
  • PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares): Potentially higher payouts with more variance.

More miners in a pool mean smaller individual shares but more frequent block discoveries, making pools essential for steady income.

Understanding Mining Difficulty

Mining difficulty is a fundamental concept in cryptocurrency mining that directly affects how easy or hard it is for miners to earn rewards. Essentially, mining difficulty determines the complexity of the cryptographic puzzles that miners must solve to validate transactions and add new blocks to the blockchain. This difficulty level is automatically adjusted by the network at regular intervals to ensure that new blocks are created at a consistent rate, regardless of how many miners are participating.

When more miners join the network and the total processing power increases, the mining difficulty rises, making it harder to solve the puzzles and requiring more advanced hardware and higher electricity consumption. Conversely, if miners leave and the network’s hash rate drops, the difficulty decreases, making it easier to earn mining rewards. For anyone running a mining operation, understanding mining difficulty is crucial for estimating potential earnings, choosing the right hardware, and deciding when to switch coins or adjust strategies. Keeping an eye on mining difficulty trends can help miners optimize their setup and stay profitable as the landscape evolves.

Calculating Mining Profitability

Profitability depends on factors like:

  • Hash rate: Your rig’s computational power (measured in MH/s or GH/s).
  • Mining difficulty: Network competition level.
  • Electricity costs: Power expenses can make or break profitability, as they play a critical role in determining overall returns. Electricity is typically billed per kilowatt hour, so the rate you pay per kilowatt hour directly affects your mining costs.
  • Block rewards: Coins earned per mined block.
  • Coin price volatility: Market price fluctuations.

High electricity rates, increased mining difficulty, or a drop in coin prices can result in losing money, making it essential to carefully assess all costs and risks before investing in mining.

Using Profitability Calculators

Websites like WhatToMine provide real-time profitability estimates by considering hash rate, power consumption, and local electricity prices (e.g., US average 16.26 cents/kWh).

Key constraints include rising difficulty, increasing energy costs, and coin price drops. Calculate ROI conservatively, factoring in hardware depreciation and potential market changes.

Professional miners suggest modeling scenarios with 10-20% higher electricity costs and 15-30% lower coin prices to ensure sustainability during downturns.

Alternative Mining Methods

Cloud Mining Services

Cloud mining lets users rent mining power without owning hardware. Platforms like Bitdeer offer contracts with transparent pricing, real-time monitoring, and clear withdrawal options. This approach eliminates the need to manage hardware directly, making it an attractive option for those seeking a hands-off mining experience.

Legitimate services provide proof of hardware and operations. Beware of scams promising unrealistic returns or lacking transparency.

Mobile Mining Options

Projects like Pi Network offer mobile mining via smartphone apps, relying on “virtual mining” where network participation replaces traditional proof-of-work.

Mobile mining emphasizes accessibility and energy efficiency but generally yields modest rewards until full network launches.

Security Considerations

Security is a top priority for anyone involved in cryptocurrency mining, as miners are responsible for safeguarding valuable digital assets and sensitive information. To protect your mining rigs and cryptocurrency wallets, always use strong, unique passwords and enable two-factor authentication wherever possible. Keeping your mining software and hardware firmware up to date is essential to defend against vulnerabilities and malware that target mining operations.

When participating in cloud mining or joining mining pools, choose reputable providers with transparent operations and robust security measures. Be cautious of phishing attempts, scams, and unauthorized access to your accounts, especially when dealing with third-party services. Regularly back up your wallet keys and store them in secure, offline locations to prevent loss due to hardware failure or cyberattacks. By prioritizing security at every step, miners can reduce risks and ensure their mining operation remains safe and productive.

Legal and Tax Considerations

Cryptocurrency mining legality varies by country; some regulate or ban mining due to energy concerns or capital controls. In most countries, mining is legal but subject to local tax laws.

Additionally, blockchain updates known as a hard fork can change the network rules, which may impact mining operations and create new tax reporting requirements.

US Tax Implications

IRS Notice 2014-21 treats mining rewards as taxable income at receipt, regardless of later price changes. Miners must classify operations as:

  • Hobby mining: Simpler reporting, limited deductions.
  • Business mining: Allows deductions for equipment, electricity, and expenses. Mining income is considered self-employment income if the mining activities constitute a trade or business or if the miner acts as an independent contractor.‍
  • Hobby mining: Simpler reporting, limited deductions.‍
  • Business mining: Allows deductions for equipment, electricity, and expenses.

Record-keeping should include hardware purchases, electricity bills, pool statements, transactions, and coin values at receipt. It is recommended that miners track their mining income throughout the year to ensure funds are available to cover taxes due.

Tax software can help maintain compliance as operations grow.

Environmental Impact of Altcoin Mining

Altcoin mining, like all forms of cryptocurrency mining, has a significant environmental footprint due to its high energy consumption and the production of electronic waste. Mining hardware such as graphics cards and ASIC miners require substantial electricity to operate, and large-scale mining operations can contribute to increased greenhouse gas emissions, especially if powered by non-renewable energy sources. Additionally, the rapid pace of hardware upgrades leads to the disposal of outdated mining rigs, adding to the growing problem of e-waste.

As the popularity of altcoin mining grows, it’s important for miners and the industry as a whole to consider more sustainable practices. This can include investing in energy-efficient mining hardware, utilizing renewable energy sources, and supporting coins that use more eco-friendly mining algorithms. By making environmentally conscious choices, miners can help reduce the impact of their operations and contribute to a more sustainable future for cryptocurrency mining.

Scaling Your Mining Operation

Scaling involves building larger multi-GPU farms or expanding multiple rigs. Professional miners often progress from single GPUs to setups with 13+ GPUs on optimized systems.

Hardware Scaling

Open-frame rigs maximize airflow and heat dissipation. Linux systems offer better uptime and resource management, especially for rigs with 8+ GPUs.

Effective scaling requires:

  • Gradual growth based on profitability.
  • Diversifying across profitable coins.
  • Robust monitoring tools.
  • Adequate electrical and cooling infrastructure.

Large operations may need dedicated facilities, as residential power may not suffice.

Thermal and Power Management

As scale grows, managing heat and power is critical:

  • Industrial ventilation.
  • Climate-controlled mining spaces.
  • Power distribution planning.
  • Backup power to avoid downtime.

Common Mining Challenges and Solutions

Operational Issues

Key challenges include heat management, rising electricity costs, and hardware failures. Cooling solutions like large fans, air conditioning, or water loops prevent damage and maintain performance.

Hardware lifespan averages 2–4 years, requiring budgeting for replacements.

Market Volatility and Difficulty

Mining difficulty and coin prices fluctuate, impacting profits. Networks adjust difficulty based on total hash rate, so more miners reduce individual earnings.

Successful miners handle:

  • Sudden difficulty spikes.
  • Price volatility.
  • Competition from efficient hardware.
  • Regulatory changes.

Technical Troubleshooting

Maintain logs and remote monitoring. Address issues like driver conflicts, power supply failures, misconfigured software, and connectivity problems promptly.

Best Practices for Altcoin Mining

To achieve the best results from your altcoin mining operation, it’s important to follow proven best practices. Start by thoroughly researching which coins are currently the most profitable to mine, taking into account mining difficulty, block rewards, and market trends. Use efficient mining software that is compatible with your hardware and join reputable mining pools to increase your chances of earning steady rewards.

Regularly monitor your mining rigs to ensure they are running optimally, and implement reliable cooling systems to prevent overheating and hardware damage. Stay informed about updates in mining software, hardware advancements, and changes in mining pool policies. Prioritize security by protecting your wallets and accounts, and always keep detailed records of your mining activities. By following these best practices, miners can optimize their mining operation, reduce downtime, and maximize their potential earnings.

Altcoin Mining Community and Resources

The altcoin mining community is a valuable resource for both new and experienced miners. Online forums, social media groups, and dedicated websites offer a wealth of information on mining software, hardware recommendations, and troubleshooting tips. Engaging with other miners through these platforms can help you stay updated on the latest trends, discover new mining pool options, and learn about the most profitable coins to mine.

Popular resources include mining calculators that estimate potential earnings, detailed reviews of mining pools, and step-by-step guides for setting up mining operations. By participating in the altcoin mining community, miners can share experiences, ask questions, and access support from others who understand the challenges of mining. Staying connected and informed will help you make smarter decisions and adapt to the ever-changing world of cryptocurrency mining.

Conclusion

Mining altcoins in 2025 provides accessible entry points for those willing to research, invest wisely, and manage operations carefully. While Bitcoin mining is impractical for home miners, many altcoins remain accessible due to ASIC resistance and lower difficulty.

Success requires balancing hardware selection, coin choice, electricity costs, and market awareness. Whether starting with one GPU or scaling up, focus on coins suited to your setup and risk tolerance.

The mining landscape evolves with new coins and algorithm changes. Begin your altcoin mining journey today by researching suitable cryptocurrencies and starting small to gain experience before expanding.

Remember that mining involves risks like hardware depreciation, market swings, and regulatory shifts. Invest only what you can afford to lose and consider long-term sustainability before major investments.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps &
AI Agents in Minutes, Not Months
Real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API.
Grab a Free API Key
About Token Metrics
Token Metrics: AI-powered crypto research and ratings platform. We help investors make smarter decisions with unbiased Token Metrics Ratings, on-chain analytics, and editor-curated “Top 10” guides. Our platform distills thousands of data points into clear scores, trends, and alerts you can act on.
30 Employees
analysts, data scientists, and crypto engineers
Daily Briefings
concise market insights and “Top Picks”
Transparent & Compliant
Sponsored ≠ Ratings; research remains independent
Want Smarter Crypto Picks—Free?
See unbiased Token Metrics Ratings for BTC, ETH, and top alts.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
 No credit card | 1-click unsubscribe
Token Metrics Team
Token Metrics Team

Recent Posts

Research

How Do You Implement Multi-Signature Wallets? A Complete 2025 Guide

Token Metrics Team
8

Multi-signature wallets represent one of the most powerful security innovations in cryptocurrency, providing enhanced protection against theft, loss, and unauthorized access. As digital assets become increasingly valuable and institutional adoption accelerates, understanding how to implement multi-signature (multisig) solutions has become essential for serious cryptocurrency holders. Whether you're managing organizational treasury funds, protecting family wealth, or simply seeking maximum security for substantial holdings, multisig wallets offer unparalleled control and redundancy.

Understanding Multi-Signature Wallet Technology

A multi-signature wallet requires multiple private keys to authorize a transaction, rather than the single key used in standard wallets. This distributed control model is typically expressed as "M-of-N," where N represents the total number of keys and M represents the minimum number required to authorize transactions.

For example, a 2-of-3 multisig wallet has three total keys, but only two are needed to move funds. This configuration provides security against single key compromise while offering recovery options if one key is lost. The cryptographic implementation occurs at the blockchain protocol level, meaning transaction authorization requirements are enforced by the network itself, not by centralized services.

The beauty of multisig lies in eliminating single points of failure. Even if an attacker compromises one key through hacking, phishing, or physical theft, they cannot access funds without obtaining additional keys stored in separate locations with different security measures.

Common Multi-Signature Configurations

  • 2-of-2 Multisig: This configuration requires both keys to authorize transactions, providing maximum security but no redundancy. Suitable for partnerships where both parties must approve every transaction. However, losing either key permanently locks funds, making this setup risky without proper backup strategies.
  • 2-of-3 Multisig: The most popular configuration balances security and practicality. You might keep one key on a hardware wallet at home, another in a safe deposit box, and a third with a trusted family member or professional custodian. Any two keys authorize transactions, so losing one key doesn't create catastrophic loss. This setup protects against theft (attacker needs two separate keys) while providing recovery options.
  • 3-of-5 Multisig: Organizations often use this configuration, distributing keys among multiple executives or board members. It requires broader consensus for transactions while tolerating loss of up to two keys. The increased complexity matches the higher stakes of organizational treasury management.
  • Advanced Custom Configurations: Advanced users implement schemes like 4-of-7 or 5-of-9 for maximum security and redundancy. These complex arrangements suit high-value holdings, institutional custody, or scenarios requiring distributed governance. However, operational complexity increases proportionally—more keys mean more coordination and management overhead.

Choosing the Right Multi-Signature Wallet Solution

Hardware-Based Solutions

Ledger and Trezor both support multisig configurations, allowing you to use multiple hardware wallets as cosigners. This approach keeps private keys isolated on secure hardware while enabling distributed control. Setting up hardware-based multisig typically involves initializing multiple devices, creating a multisig wallet through compatible software, and registering each hardware wallet as a cosigner.

Coldcard particularly excels for Bitcoin multisig, offering air-gapped security and extensive multisig features. Its advanced capabilities suit security-conscious users willing to navigate more complex setup procedures for maximum protection.

Software Coordinators

While keys should reside on hardware wallets, coordinator software manages multisig wallet creation and transaction building. Electrum provides robust Bitcoin multisig support with straightforward setup procedures. Sparrow Wallet offers excellent multisig features with superior user experience and advanced capabilities.

For Ethereum and ERC-20 tokens, Gnosis Safe (formerly Gnosis Multisig) has become the industry standard, particularly for DeFi treasury management. Its web interface simplifies multisig operations while maintaining security through hardware wallet integration.

Blockchain-Specific Considerations

Bitcoin's native multisig support through P2SH (Pay-to-Script-Hash) and P2WSH (Pay-to-Witness-Script-Hash) addresses provides robust, time-tested functionality. Ethereum implements multisig through smart contracts, offering more flexibility but requiring gas for deployment and transactions.

Other blockchains like Solana, Cardano, and Polkadot each have unique multisig implementations. Research your specific blockchain's multisig capabilities before committing to particular solutions.

Step-by-Step Implementation Process

Planning Your Configuration

Begin by determining the appropriate M-of-N configuration for your needs. Consider security requirements, number of parties involved, operational frequency, and recovery scenarios. Document your security model clearly, including who controls which keys and under what circumstances transactions should be authorized.

Acquiring Hardware Wallets

Purchase the necessary hardware wallets directly from manufacturers. For a 2-of-3 setup, you need three separate hardware wallets. Never reuse the same device or seed phrase—each cosigner must have completely independent keys.

Initializing Individual Wallets

Set up each hardware wallet independently, generating unique seed phrases for each device. Record seed phrases on durable materials and store them in separate secure locations. Never digitize seed phrases or store multiple phrases together.

Creating the Multisig Wallet

Using your chosen coordinator software, create the multisig wallet by registering each hardware wallet as a cosigner. The software will request the public key or extended public key (xpub) from each device—note that you're sharing public keys only, not private keys.

The coordinator generates the multisig address where funds will be stored. This address is cryptographically linked to all registered cosigner public keys, ensuring only transactions signed with the required number of private keys will be accepted by the blockchain.

Testing with Small Amounts

Before transferring substantial funds, thoroughly test your multisig setup. Send a small amount to the multisig address, then practice creating and signing transactions with the required number of keys. Verify you can successfully move funds out of the wallet before trusting it with significant amounts.

Test recovery scenarios by attempting to transact using different combinations of keys. Ensure you understand the complete transaction signing workflow and that all cosigners can successfully participate.

Making Strategic Decisions with Professional Analytics

Implementing multisig security is just one component of successful cryptocurrency management. Making informed decisions about which assets to hold, when to rebalance, and how to optimize your portfolio requires sophisticated analytical capabilities.

Discover Crypto Gems with Token Metrics AI

Operational Best Practices

Key Distribution Strategy

Distribute keys across multiple physical locations with different security profiles. Never store multiple keys in the same location—this defeats the purpose of multisig. Consider geographic distribution to protect against localized disasters like fires or floods.

For keys held by different individuals, ensure clear communication protocols exist. Everyone involved should understand their responsibilities, how to recognize legitimate transaction requests, and procedures for emergency situations.

Transaction Workflow

Establish clear processes for initiating, reviewing, and signing transactions. Who can propose transactions? What review occurs before cosigners add signatures? How are urgent situations handled? Documented workflows prevent confusion and ensure all parties understand their roles.

Use the coordinator software to create transactions, which are then presented to cosigners for review and signature. Each cosigner independently verifies transaction details before signing with their private key. Only after collecting the required number of signatures is the transaction broadcast to the blockchain.

Regular Audits and Drills

Periodically verify all keys remain accessible and functional. Practice the complete transaction signing process quarterly or semi-annually to ensure everyone remembers procedures and that all hardware and software remain compatible and updated.

Test recovery scenarios where one or more keys become unavailable. Verify you can still access funds using alternative key combinations. These drills identify potential issues before emergencies occur.

Security Considerations

Protecting Against Internal Threats

While multisig protects against external attackers, consider internal threats. In a 2-of-3 configuration, any two key holders could collude to steal funds. Select cosigners carefully and consider configurations requiring more keys for higher-value holdings.

Software and Hardware Updates

Keep coordinator software and hardware wallet firmware updated to patch security vulnerabilities. However, test updates on small amounts before applying them to wallets holding substantial funds. Occasionally, updates introduce compatibility issues that could temporarily lock access.

Backup and Recovery Documentation

Create comprehensive documentation of your multisig setup, including the configuration type, which hardware wallets serve as cosigners, extended public keys, and the multisig address itself. Store this information separately from seed phrases—someone recovering your wallet needs this metadata to reconstruct the multisig configuration.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Never store multiple seed phrases together, as this recreates single point of failure vulnerabilities. Don't skip testing phases—discover operational issues with small amounts rather than substantial holdings. Avoid overly complex configurations that create operational difficulties, and ensure at least one other trusted person understands your multisig setup for inheritance purposes.

Advanced Features and Future Developments

Modern multisig solutions increasingly incorporate time-locks, spending limits, and white-listing features. Smart contract-based multisig wallets on Ethereum offer programmable conditions like daily spending caps, recovery mechanisms after extended inactivity, and role-based permissions.

Emerging developments include social recovery mechanisms where trusted contacts can help recover wallets, threshold signature schemes (TSS) that improve privacy and efficiency compared to traditional multisig, and standardization efforts making multisig more accessible across different blockchains and wallet providers.

Conclusion

Implementing multi-signature wallets significantly enhances cryptocurrency security by eliminating single points of failure and providing recovery options. While setup requires more effort than standard wallets, the protection multisig offers for substantial holdings justifies the additional complexity.

By carefully planning your configuration, using quality hardware wallets, following proper operational procedures, and leveraging professional platforms like Token Metrics for strategic decision-making, you can build a robust security framework that protects your digital assets while maintaining practical accessibility.

In an ecosystem where theft and loss are permanent and irreversible, multisig represents best practice for serious cryptocurrency holders who refuse to gamble with their financial future.

Research

What is the Biggest Challenge in Building DApps?

Token Metrics Team
7

Bottom Line Up Front: User experience remains the single biggest challenge in building decentralized applications (DApps), encompassing wallet complexity, transaction costs, slow speeds, and the steep learning curve that prevents mainstream adoption—despite significant technological advances in blockchain infrastructure.

Decentralized applications represent the future of web3, promising censorship-resistant, permissionless platforms that return control to users. However, despite billions in venture capital funding and thousands of DApps launched across multiple blockchains, mainstream adoption remains elusive. The challenges facing DApp developers are multifaceted and interconnected, but one stands above the rest: creating an experience that rivals traditional centralized applications while maintaining the core principles of decentralization.

For developers and investors navigating this complex landscape, platforms like Token Metrics provide critical insights into which DApps are overcoming these challenges and gaining real user traction through comprehensive analytics and on-chain data analysis.

The User Experience Barrier

While technological purists might point to scalability or security as the primary challenges, the reality is that user experience (UX) creates the most significant barrier to DApp adoption. Traditional application users expect seamless, intuitive experiences—one-click sign-ups, instant loading, and forgiving interfaces. DApps, by contrast, often require users to navigate complex wallet setups, manage private keys, pay gas fees, wait for block confirmations, and understand blockchain-specific concepts before performing even simple actions.

This friction manifests in stark adoption statistics. As of 2025, even the most successful DApps have user bases measured in hundreds of thousands or low millions—a fraction of comparable centralized applications. Metamask, the leading Ethereum wallet, has approximately 30 million monthly active users globally, while traditional fintech apps like PayPal serve hundreds of millions.

Wallet Management: The First Hurdle

The journey begins with wallet onboarding, an immediate obstacle for non-technical users. Creating a self-custodial wallet requires users to understand public-private key cryptography, secure their seed phrases (often 12-24 random words), and accept that there's no "forgot password" option. Lose your seed phrase, and your assets are permanently inaccessible—a terrifying proposition for mainstream users accustomed to account recovery options.

Smart contract wallets and social recovery mechanisms are emerging solutions, but they add complexity to the development process and aren't yet standardized across the ecosystem. Account abstraction promises to abstract away these complexities, but implementation remains inconsistent across different blockchains.

Transaction Costs and Volatility

Gas fees represent another critical challenge that directly impacts user experience and development decisions. During periods of network congestion, Ethereum transaction costs have exceeded $50-100 for simple operations, making small-value transactions economically impractical. While Layer 2 solutions like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon have dramatically reduced costs, they introduce additional complexity through bridge mechanisms and fragmented liquidity.

Moreover, gas fee volatility creates unpredictable user experiences. A DApp might cost pennies to use one day and dollars the next, depending on network conditions. This unpredictability is antithetical to the consistent pricing models users expect from traditional applications.

Developers must architect DApps to minimize on-chain transactions, carefully optimize smart contract code for gas efficiency, and often subsidize transaction costs for users—all adding development complexity and operational expenses.

Performance and Speed Limitations

Despite significant blockchain infrastructure improvements, DApps still struggle with performance compared to centralized alternatives. Block confirmation times mean users wait seconds or even minutes for transaction finality—an eternity in modern web standards where sub-second response times are expected.

This latency affects different DApp categories differently. Decentralized finance (DeFi) applications can often tolerate confirmation delays, but gaming DApps and social platforms require near-instant interactions to feel responsive. Developers must implement creative workarounds like optimistic UI updates and off-chain computation, adding development complexity.

Blockchain data retrieval also presents challenges. Querying smart contract state efficiently requires specialized indexing infrastructure like The Graph protocol, adding dependencies and potential centralization vectors that complicate the development stack.

Smart Contract Development Complexity

Building secure smart contracts requires specialized expertise in languages like Solidity, Rust, or Vyper—skills that are scarce and expensive in the developer marketplace. Unlike traditional development where bugs can be patched with updates, smart contract vulnerabilities can result in irreversible loss of user funds.

The industry has witnessed numerous high-profile exploits resulting in billions of dollars stolen from DApps. The Ronin bridge hack cost $625 million, while protocol vulnerabilities in DeFi platforms continue to drain funds regularly. This necessitates extensive auditing, formal verification, and bug bounty programs—all adding significant time and cost to development cycles.

Developers must also navigate rapidly evolving standards and best practices. What constitutes secure smart contract architecture today may be considered vulnerable tomorrow as new attack vectors are discovered. This creates ongoing maintenance burdens that exceed traditional application development.

Interoperability and Fragmentation

The blockchain ecosystem's fragmentation across multiple Layer 1 and Layer 2 networks creates additional development challenges. Building truly multi-chain DApps requires understanding different virtual machines (EVM vs. non-EVM), varying security models, and bridge mechanisms that introduce their own risks.

Each blockchain ecosystem has different wallet support, block times, programming languages, and development tools. Developers must either choose a single chain and accept limited addressable market, or multiply development effort by supporting multiple chains. Cross-chain communication protocols exist but add complexity and potential security vulnerabilities.

Data Availability and Storage

Blockchain storage is expensive and limited, making it impractical to store large amounts of data on-chain. DApp developers must implement hybrid architectures combining on-chain smart contracts with off-chain storage solutions like IPFS, Arweave, or centralized databases—reintroducing trust assumptions and complexity.

This creates challenges for DApps requiring rich media content, detailed user profiles, or historical data access. Developers must carefully architect which data lives on-chain (typically just critical state and proofs) versus off-chain (everything else), managing synchronization and availability across these layers.

Regulatory Uncertainty

While not purely technical, regulatory ambiguity significantly impacts DApp development decisions. Developers must navigate unclear legal frameworks regarding token issuance, securities laws, anti-money laundering requirements, and jurisdictional questions. This uncertainty affects funding, feature design, and even whether to proceed with certain DApp concepts.

DeFi applications face particular scrutiny regarding compliance with financial regulations, while NFT marketplaces grapple with intellectual property concerns. Developers often lack clear guidance on how to remain compliant while maintaining decentralization principles.

Leveraging Analytics for Success

For DApp developers and investors tracking this evolving landscape, Token Metrics stands out as a premier crypto analytics platform. Token Metrics provides comprehensive data on DApp performance metrics, including user activity, transaction volumes, total value locked (TVL), and smart contract interactions across multiple blockchains.

The platform's AI-driven analytics help identify which DApps are successfully overcoming adoption challenges, revealing patterns in user retention, growth trajectories, and protocol health. This intelligence is invaluable for developers benchmarking against competitors and investors seeking projects with genuine traction beyond marketing hype.

Token Metrics' on-chain analysis capabilities allow stakeholders to distinguish between vanity metrics and authentic user engagement—critical for evaluating DApp success in an industry where metrics can be easily manipulated.

The Path Forward

While numerous challenges exist in DApp development, user experience encompasses and amplifies most others. Improvements in blockchain scalability, account abstraction, gasless transactions, and better development tools are gradually addressing these issues. However, bridging the gap between DApp and traditional app experiences remains the industry's paramount challenge.

Successful DApps increasingly abstract blockchain complexity behind familiar interfaces, subsidize user transaction costs, and implement hybrid architectures that balance decentralization with performance. Those that master this balance while maintaining security will drive the next wave of mainstream blockchain adoption.

As the ecosystem matures, platforms like Token Metrics become essential for navigating the thousands of DApps competing for users and capital, providing the data-driven insights necessary to identify which projects are truly solving the adoption challenge rather than simply building technology in search of users.

Research

What is the Difference Between Solidity and Vyper? Complete 2025 Guide

Token Metrics Team
7

Smart contracts have revolutionized the blockchain ecosystem, enabling self-executing code that automatically enforces agreed-upon terms and conditions. As decentralized applications continue growing in sophistication and value, the programming languages used to create these contracts become increasingly critical. Two languages dominate Ethereum smart contract development: Solidity and Vyper. Token Metrics.

Understanding Smart Contract Languages

Before diving into Solidity vs Vyper comparison, it's essential to understand what smart contract languages do and why they matter. Smart contracts are programs that run on blockchain platforms like Ethereum, executing predetermined actions when specific conditions are met. These contracts facilitate secure, transparent, and trustless interactions between parties, eliminating intermediaries and enhancing efficiency.

Smart contract languages enable developers to define the logic and behavior of these contracts, which are immutable and executed on the blockchain. By leveraging smart contract languages, businesses can automate processes including supply chain management, financial transactions, governance systems, and much more.

High-Level vs Low-Level Languages

Smart contract programming requires converting human-readable code into machine-executable bytecode that the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) can process. Developers must first choose between high-level and low-level languages based on their use case and expertise.

High-level languages abstract away granular implementation details, allowing developers to create smart contracts without deep bytecode knowledge. Solidity and Vyper are both high-level languages designed for EVM-compatible blockchains, making them accessible to developers from traditional programming backgrounds.

After compilation, both Solidity and Vyper smart contracts execute using the same bytecode language, meaning they can be used concurrently in the same application despite their different source code appearances.

Solidity: The Industry Standard

Solidity is the most widely used programming language for developing smart contracts on the Ethereum blockchain and EVM-compatible chains. Designed specifically for blockchain applications, Solidity enables developers to create secure, decentralized, and automated agreements that run on distributed networks.

Origins and Design Philosophy

Proposed by Ethereum CTO Gavin Wood, Solidity was developed to meet demand for a flexible smart contract-based developer platform. The language draws heavily on inspiration from C++, JavaScript, and Python, making it familiar to developers from various programming backgrounds.

Solidity is a high-level, Turing-complete, statically typed language where developers must explicitly declare variable types. This allows the compiler to have knowledge of data types, ensuring deterministic application behavior—a critical requirement for blockchain applications where predictability is paramount.

Key Features of Solidity

  • Object-Oriented Programming: Supports inheritance, libraries, and complex data structures for sophisticated smart contracts with reusable components.
  • Rich Feature Set: Includes function overloading, multiple inheritance, user-defined types, and complex data structures.
  • Extensive Ecosystem: Benefits from a large community support, documentation, and development tools like Remix, Hardhat, and Foundry.
  • Blockchain-Specific Commands: Built-in commands for addresses, transactions, and block data interactions.
  • Wide Adoption: Most Ethereum projects, including Uniswap, Aave, and OpenSea, are developed using Solidity.

Advantages of Solidity

  • Market Dominance: Secures 87% of DeFi TVL, making it the dominant language for decentralized finance.
  • Robust Tooling: Mature ecosystem with testing, debugging, and analysis tools.
  • Versatility: Enables implementation of complex protocols, financial instruments, and governance procedures.
  • Learning Resources: Abundant tutorials, courses, and community support.

Disadvantages of Solidity

  • Security Vulnerabilities: Increased attack surface with risks like reentrancy and integer overflows, requiring thorough audits.
  • Complexity: Extensive features can lead to harder-to-audit contracts and hidden vulnerabilities.
  • Steeper Learning Curve: Requires understanding blockchain-specific security considerations.

Vyper: The Security-First Alternative

Vyper is a contract-oriented programming language that targets the EVM with a focus on security, simplicity, and auditability. Introduced in 2018 by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, Vyper was specifically developed to address security issues prevalent in Solidity.

Design Philosophy: Security Through Simplicity

Vyper's fundamental philosophy is that security comes from simplicity and readability. The language intentionally limits features and enforces stricter syntax to make contracts more secure and easier to audit. By reducing what’s possible, Vyper minimizes opportunities for mistakes and vulnerabilities.

Using Pythonic syntax—hence the serpentine name—Vyper code prioritizes readability so developers can easily detect bugs and vulnerabilities before deploying contracts. This approach makes code auditable by humans, not just machines.

Key Features of Vyper

  • Python-Like Syntax: Familiar for Python developers, with indentation-based structure and clear syntax.
  • Security-First Design: Eliminates object-oriented features, such as inheritance and function overloading, to reduce attack vectors.
  • Strong Typing: Variables require explicit type declaration, catching errors early.
  • Bounds Checking & Overflow Protection: Built-in safety features prevent common vulnerabilities.
  • Decidability & Gas Optimization: Ensures predictable gas consumption and avoids infinite loops, making contracts more efficient.

Advantages of Vyper

  • Enhanced Security: Designed specifically to prevent common vulnerabilities, leading to more secure contracts.
  • Readable & Audit-Friendly: Clear syntax facilitates quicker reviews and lower audit costs.
  • Concise Code: Fewer lines and simpler syntax streamline contract development.
  • Python Background: Eases onboarding for Python programmers.
  • Potential Gas Savings: Simple design can lead to more efficient contracts in specific cases.

Disadvantages of Vyper

  • Limited Adoption: Only about 8% of DeFi TVL, with a smaller ecosystem and community.
  • Fewer Features: Lack of inheritance, modifiers, and function overloading limits architectural options.
  • Smaller Tooling Ecosystem: Development tools and libraries are less mature compared to Solidity.
  • Less Industry Traction: Major projects predominantly use Solidity, limiting existing examples for Vyper development.

Differences: Solidity vs Vyper

  • Syntax & Structure: Solidity resembles JavaScript and C++, with curly braces and semicolons; Vyper uses Python-like indentation and syntax, omitting object-oriented features.
  • Feature Completeness: Solidity offers inheritance, modifiers, and dynamic data structures; Vyper is minimalist, focusing on security with fixed-size arrays and no inheritance.
  • Security Approach: Solidity relies on developer diligence and testing; Vyper enforces limitations to inherently prevent vulnerabilities.
  • Development Philosophy: Solidity emphasizes flexibility, while Vyper emphasizes security and auditability.

Choosing Between Solidity and Vyper

The decision depends on project needs, team expertise, and security priorities. Large, feature-rich DeFi protocols and complex dApps typically require Solidity's extensive capabilities. Conversely, systems demanding maximum security, or contracts that need to be highly auditable, may benefit from Vyper’s simplicity and security-focused design.

Many projects effectively combine both, using Vyper for security-critical core components and Solidity for peripheral features. This hybrid approach leverages the strengths of each language.

Leveraging Token Metrics for Smart Contract Analysis

While understanding the distinctions between Solidity and Vyper is valuable for developers, investors should also evaluate the projects' underlying code quality, security track record, and development activity. Token Metrics offers AI-powered analytics that examine code repositories, audit statuses, and project activity levels.

The platform reviews security vulnerabilities, audit history, and real-time security incidents, providing a comprehensive view that helps identify projects with strong technical foundations, regardless of their chosen language.

Furthermore, Token Metrics tracks project development activity via GitHub, helping gauge ongoing commitment and progress. Market intelligence and performance analysis reveal success patterns and areas of risk, supporting informed decision-making.

Token Metrics assists investors in balancing portfolios across projects built with different languages, offering risk assessments and alerts that enhance proactive management amid evolving blockchain security landscapes.

The Future of Smart Contract Languages

Both Solidity and Vyper are actively evolving to meet new challenges and security needs. Solidity continues enhancing security features, error handling, and optimization, driven by its large ecosystem. Vyper development emphasizes expanding capabilities while maintaining its core security principles.

Emerging languages and cross-language development strategies are beginning to complement established techniques. Combining secure core contracts in Vyper with the flexibility of Solidity is an increasingly common pattern.

Best Practices for Smart Contract Development

  • Thorough Testing: Implement comprehensive testing, including formal verification and audits, before deployment.
  • Security Audits: Engage reputable security firms to review code vulnerabilities.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Use platforms like Token Metrics for real-time risk detection post-deployment.
  • Upgradeability: Adopt upgrade patterns that allow fixing issues without losing funds or functionality.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice

Solidity and Vyper offer distinct approaches to smart contract development. Solidity’s comprehensive features and robust ecosystem make it suitable for complex, feature-rich applications. Vyper's security-oriented, Python-like syntax is ideal for systems where auditability, simplicity, and security are top priorities.

Both languages will continue to play vital roles throughout 2025, with many projects adopting hybrid strategies. Evaluating project needs, security considerations, and team expertise will guide optimal language selection. AI analytics platforms like Token Metrics provide critical insights to support this decision, ensuring better understanding and risk management in the ever-evolving ecosystem.

Choose from Platinum, Gold, and Silver packages
Reach with 25–30% open rates and 0.5–1% CTR
Craft your own custom ad—from banners to tailored copy
Perfect for Crypto Exchanges, SaaS Tools, DeFi, and AI Products