ISO 20022 Coins - Are These Coins Good to Invest?

Crypto Basics

ISO 20022 Coins - Are These Coins Good to Invest?

Learn everything about ISO 20022 coins and how it works. Explore the potential of ISO 20022 coins as an investment option in 2023.

S. Vishwa

8 Minutes

MIN

Index

Overview of Solana Blockchain

In the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency, staying updated with the latest standards and technologies is imperative. One such development that has gained traction is the adoption of the ISO 20022 messaging standard.

In this comprehensive guide, we'll dive deep into what ISO 20022 coins are, their significance, and how they're revolutionizing crypto space.

What is ISO 20022?

Definition - ISO 20022 is a global messaging standard adopted by the financial world. It's not just limited to crypto but extends to other financial transactions, including payments, securities, trade services, cards, and foreign exchange. Its goal is to create a universal standard for exchanging financial messages.

Importance in the Financial Ecosystem - By promoting a singular messaging standard, ISO 20022 simplifies global business communication. It reduces errors, lowers operational costs, and promotes seamless integration among different financial systems worldwide.

ISO 20022 and Cryptocurrency

Bridging the Traditional and Digital Worlds - ISO 20022 acts as a bridge between traditional banking and the digital currency world. By integrating this standard, cryptocurrencies can be more widely recognized and accepted by mainstream financial institutions, fostering mutual growth.

Ensuring Data Richness - The messaging standard carries detailed information about transactions, ensuring more transparency and facilitating better compliance with regulations. This is especially critical in the crypto space, often viewed as a 'wild west' of finance.

How Do ISO 20022 Coins Work?

The intricate world of ISO 20022 coins stems from their integration of the ISO 20022 messaging standard, a globally accepted protocol for transmitting financial information.

But how does this integration manifest itself in the operation of these coins? At its core, ISO 20022 is a comprehensive and versatile framework that uses structured and descriptive messages.

When cryptocurrencies incorporate this standard, they essentially remodel their transactional messaging to be in sync with this universally recognized protocol.

This means that every transaction carried out with an ISO 20022 compliant coin is embedded with rich data, encompassing not just the fundamental details like sender, receiver, and amount, but also metadata about the transaction itself.

The structured nature of these messages significantly minimizes ambiguities and errors. In practical terms, when you're transacting with an ISO 20022 coin, whether you're sending, receiving, or just verifying a transaction, the underlying technology ensures a clearer, more standardized, and detail-rich information flow.

This doesn't just make the transaction more transparent; it also facilitates easier integration and communication with traditional financial systems that already employ the ISO 20022 standard.

Hence, these coins act as a bridge, melding the innovative realm of cryptocurrencies with the established world of mainstream finance, making cross-border transactions, trade finance, and global payments more seamless and efficient than ever before.

List of ISO 20022 compliant cryptocurrencies

As of 2023, several cryptocurrencies have notably aligned themselves with the ISO 20022 standard, marking a significant step towards bridging traditional financial operations with the revolutionary world of digital assets:

XRP (XRP): Spearheading the ISO 20022 adoption, XRP, backed by the Ripple company, offers a digital payment protocol more than just a cryptocurrency.

It specializes in faster, cost-effective cross-border transactions, with its infrastructure designed to facilitate direct transfers between two parties in any form of currency, including other cryptos.

Quant (QNT): Quant's Overledger is renowned for its capability to interlink various blockchains, enabling them to operate harmoniously. By embracing ISO 20022, Quant further amplifies its commitment to connect diverse financial systems seamlessly and efficiently.

Algorand (ALGO): A public blockchain and cryptocurrency project, Algorand focuses on ensuring decentralized agreements and constructing new financial tools. Its adoption of ISO 20022 underscores its mission to maintain a transparent, secure, and speedy transaction system.

Stellar (XLM): Stellar's mission to connect banks, payment systems, and consumers seamlessly finds further strength with its ISO 20022 integration. It's optimized for quick transactions, making cross-border transfers affordable and straightforward.

Hedera HashGraph (HBAR): Distinct from a traditional blockchain, Hedera Hashgraph offers a distributed ledger technology, boasting high-grade security and speed. Their commitment to the ISO 20022 standard highlights their aim for broader financial collaboration and streamlined transactions.

IOTA (MIOTA): Rather than a blockchain, IOTA employs a directed acyclic graph called Tangle to manage its transactions. The ISO 20022 compliance attests to IOTA's dedication to evolve and sync with the globally accepted financial standards, amplifying its suitability for microtransactions and IoT implementations.

XDC Network (XDC): This enterprise-ready hybrid blockchain solution, specifically designed for Trade and Finance, optimally aligns with the ISO 20022 standard. XDC stands out in terms of interoperability, efficiency, and ease of integration into legacy systems, making it a prime choice for global finance operations.

Are ISO 20022 Compliant Coins Good to Invest?

Navigating the vast cryptocurrency market for sound investments often hinges on spotting trends anchored in real-world utility. ISO 20022 compliant coins, given their alignment with a global financial messaging standard, inherently possess a competitive edge.

Their integration with this standard signifies a commitment to transparency, interoperability, and regulatory compliance. For investors, this can translate to a higher degree of trust and potential for mainstream adoption.

While all investments come with risks, the strategic position of ISO 20022 coins in bridging traditional finance with digital assets makes them a compelling consideration for a diversified crypto portfolio.

Future Outlook and Possibilities

As we move further into the digital age, the adoption of universal standards like ISO 20022 becomes increasingly important. This trend suggests a brighter future for compliant coins, with the potential for wider mainstream acceptance and more robust investment opportunities.

Already, we're seeing financial institutions, payment providers, and regulatory bodies taking interest in these coins, signaling their growing relevance.

As more sectors of the financial world adopt the ISO 20022 standard, these cryptocurrencies could become the go-to options for transactions that require speed, transparency, and a high degree of compatibility with existing financial systems.

Benefits of ISO 20022 Coins

Enhanced Interoperability - These coins can communicate effortlessly with banks and other financial entities using the same standard, eliminating potential barriers.

Advanced Compliance - With detailed transaction information, it becomes easier for these coins to adhere to regulatory standards, instilling more trust among investors and institutions.

Cost-Efficiency - A universal standard cuts down on transaction discrepancies, reducing the cost of resolving such issues and ensuring smooth operations.

Challenges and Considerations

Integration Overhead - Adapting to ISO 20022 can be cumbersome for some projects, given the need to overhaul existing systems.

Rapidly Evolving Crypto Landscape - While ISO 20022 is a robust standard, the world of crypto is ever-changing. Coins must ensure that this adoption doesn't stifle innovation or flexibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. What triggered the need for a standard like ISO 20022 in cryptocurrencies?

While cryptocurrencies are revolutionary, their acceptance and integration into the broader financial system require standardized communication. ISO 20022 provides this standard, ensuring smooth, error-free transactions with traditional financial entities.

Q2. How does ISO 20022 impact cross-border transactions?

ISO 20022 streamlines and simplifies cross-border transactions, ensuring they're faster, more transparent, and compatible with varying regional financial systems.

Q3. Does ISO 20022 compliance mean a cryptocurrency is more secure?

While ISO 20022 enhances transaction clarity and standardization, it doesn't necessarily correlate with heightened security. Each cryptocurrency's security is based on its underlying technology and protocol.

Q4. How does ISO 20022 influence transaction fees?

By standardizing transaction messaging, ISO 20022 can potentially reduce errors and discrepancies, which might lead to reduced costs. However, transaction fees are also influenced by other factors, such as network congestion.

Q5. Will more cryptocurrencies adopt ISO 20022 in the future?

Given the standard's growing importance in the financial world, it's likely that more cryptocurrencies will consider ISO 20022 adoption to increase interoperability and acceptance among traditional financial institutions.

Q6. How can I check if a cryptocurrency is ISO 20022 compliant?

Usually, cryptocurrency projects that adopt ISO 20022 will announce it through their official channels. Investors can check the project's whitepaper, official website, or community forums for such information.

Q7. Are there any drawbacks for cryptocurrencies adopting ISO 20022?

While the standard brings many benefits, adoption might mean a significant overhaul of existing systems for some cryptocurrencies. This can be resource-intensive and may temporarily divert focus from other developmental priorities.

Q8. Can ISO 20022 adoption influence a cryptocurrency's price?

Market sentiment is influenced by various factors, including adoption of global standards. While ISO 20022 compliance might be seen as a positive development, it's just one of many factors that can impact a coin's price.

The Bottom Line

In an ecosystem as dynamic as cryptocurrency, the adoption of ISO 20022 presents a seismic shift, setting a new benchmark for financial messaging standards.

By integrating this globally recognized standard, these coins are not just pioneering a new frontier of transparency and efficiency but are also forging a stronger alliance with the mainstream financial world.

Whether you're an investor or simply interested in the future of digital assets, ISO 20022 compliant coins warrant your attention.

Also remember, Cryptocurrencies exhibit significant volatility. Before committing to any investment decisions, it's crucial to conduct thorough research or seek guidance from a financial advisor.

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other sort of advice and you should not treat any of the website's content as such.

Token Metrics does not recommend that any cryptocurrency should be bought, sold, or held by you. Do conduct your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Create Your Free Token Metrics Account

Access our Ratings Page for valuable token insights

Explore our Market Page for a comprehensive market overview

Stay in the loop with exclusive weekly Newsletters filled with insider tips and updates

Join our private Telegram group for exclusive community access

Create Your Free Account

Exploring Investments in Crypto and Web3 Companies: An Analytical Overview

Token Metrics Team

MIN

Introduction

The landscape of digital assets and blockchain technology has expanded rapidly over recent years, bringing forth a new realm known as Web3 alongside the burgeoning crypto ecosystem. For individuals curious about allocating resources into this sphere, questions often arise: should the focus be on cryptocurrencies or Web3 companies? This article aims to provide an educational and analytical perspective on these options, highlighting considerations without providing direct investment advice.

Understanding Crypto and Web3

Before exploring the nuances between investing in crypto assets and Web3 companies, it's important to clarify what each represents.

Cryptocurrencies are digital currencies that operate on blockchain technology, enabling peer-to-peer transactions with varying protocols and use cases.
Web3 broadly refers to a decentralized internet infrastructure leveraging blockchain technologies to create applications, platforms, and services that prioritize user control, privacy, and decentralization.

Web3 companies often develop decentralized applications (dApps), offer blockchain-based services, or build infrastructure layers for the decentralized web.

Key Considerations When Evaluating Investment Options

Deciding between crypto assets or Web3 companies involves analyzing different dynamics:

Market Maturity and Volatility
Cryptocurrencies generally exhibit higher price volatility influenced by market sentiment, regulatory news, and technology updates. Web3 companies, often in startup or growth phases, carry inherent business risk but may relate more to traditional company valuation metrics.
Fundamental Drivers
Crypto assets derive value from network utility, adoption, scarcity mechanisms, and consensus protocols. Web3 firms generate value through product innovation, user engagement, revenue models, and ability to scale decentralized solutions.
Regulatory Environment
Both realms face evolving regulatory landscapes globally, with different degrees of scrutiny around cryptocurrencies and blockchain enterprises. Awareness of legal considerations is essential for educational understanding.
Technological Innovation
Web3 companies typically focus on developing novel decentralized infrastructures and applications. Crypto projects may emphasize improvements in consensus algorithms, interoperability, or token economics.

Analytical Frameworks for Assessment

To approach these complex investment types thoughtfully, frameworks can assist in structuring analysis:

Scenario Analysis: Evaluate various future scenarios for cryptocurrency adoption and Web3 technology evolution to understand possible outcomes and risks.
Fundamental Analysis: For crypto, analyze network activity, token utility, and supply models. For Web3 companies, consider business plans, technological edge, leadership quality, and market positioning.
Technology Evaluation: Examine the underlying blockchain protocols and development communities supporting both crypto projects and Web3 startups, assessing innovation and sustainability.

Leveraging AI-Driven Tools for Research

Due to the rapidly evolving and data-intensive nature of crypto and Web3 industries, AI-powered platforms can enhance analysis by processing vast datasets and providing insights.

For instance, Token Metrics utilizes machine learning to rate crypto assets by analyzing market trends, project fundamentals, and sentiment data. Such tools support an educational and neutral perspective by offering data-driven research support rather than speculative advice.

When assessing Web3 companies, AI tools can assist with identifying emerging technologies, tracking developmental progress, and monitoring regulatory developments relevant to the decentralized ecosystem.

Practical Tips for Conducting Due Diligence

To gain a well-rounded understanding, consider the following steps:

Research Whitepapers and Roadmaps: For crypto tokens and Web3 startups, review technical documentation and strategic plans.
Evaluate Team Credentials: Analyze the experience and transparency of project founders and teams.
Monitor Community Engagement: Observe activity levels in forums, GitHub repositories, and social media to gauge project vitality.
Use Analytical Tools: Incorporate platforms like Token Metrics for data-supported insights on token metrics and project evaluations.
Consider Regulatory Developments: Stay informed about jurisdictional policies impacting blockchain projects and cryptocurrencies.

Understanding Risk Factors

Both crypto assets and Web3 companies involve unique risks that warrant careful consideration:

Market Risk: Price volatility and market sentiment swings can impact crypto tokens significantly.
Technological Risk: Innovative technologies may have bugs or scalability challenges affecting project viability.
Regulatory Risk: Changes in legal frameworks can alter operational capacities or market access for Web3 entities and crypto tokens.
Business Model Risk: Web3 startups may face competitive pressures, funding challenges, or adoption hurdles.

Conclusion

Deciding between crypto assets and Web3 companies involves analyzing different dimensions including technological fundamentals, market dynamics, and risk profiles. Employing structured evaluation frameworks along with AI-enhanced research platforms such as Token Metrics can provide clarity in this complex landscape.

It is essential to approach this domain with an educational mindset focused on understanding rather than speculative intentions. Staying informed and leveraging analytical tools supports sound comprehension of the evolving world of blockchain-based digital assets and enterprises.

Disclaimer

This article is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult with professional advisors before making any decisions related to cryptocurrencies or Web3 companies.

Research

Why Is Web3 User Experience Still Lagging Behind Web2?

Token Metrics Team

MIN

Introduction to Web3 UX

The evolution from Web2 to Web3 marks a significant paradigm shift in how we interact with digital services. While Web2 platforms have delivered intuitive and seamless user experiences, Web3—the decentralized internet leveraging blockchain technology—still faces considerable user experience (UX) challenges. This article explores the reasons behind the comparatively poor UX in Web3 and the technical, design, and infrastructural hurdles contributing to this gap.

Contextual Understanding: Web2 vs Web3

Web2 represents the current mainstream internet experience characterized by centralized servers, interactive social platforms, and streamlined services. Its UX benefits from consistent standards, mature design patterns, and direct control over data.

In contrast, Web3 aims at decentralization, enabling peer-to-peer interactions through blockchain protocols, decentralized applications (dApps), and user-owned data ecosystems. While promising increased privacy and autonomy, Web3 inherently introduces complexity in UX design.

Technical Complexities Affecting Web3 UX

Several intrinsic technical barriers impact the Web3 user experience:

Decentralization and Interoperability: Decentralized networks operate without centralized control, making transaction speed and reliability variable compared to Web2's central servers.
Blockchain Transaction Latency: Block confirmation times, network congestion, and gas fees create delays and unpredictability in user interactions.
Wallet and Key Management: Users must manage private keys and wallets, which can be confusing and risky for non-technical audiences.
User Onboarding Frictions: Requirements like acquiring cryptocurrency tokens for transaction fees create an additional barrier unique to Web3.

Design and Usability Issues in Web3

The nascent nature of Web3 results in inconsistent and sometimes opaque design standards:

Complex Terminology and Concepts: Terms like gas, smart contracts, staking, and cryptographic signatures are unfamiliar to average users.
Poorly Standardized UI Components: Unlike Web2, where UI/UX libraries and guidelines are well-established, Web3 lacks uniform design principles, leading to fragmented experiences.
Minimal User Feedback: Web3 apps sometimes provide limited real-time feedback during transactions, causing uncertainty.
Security and Trust Indicators: The responsibility to confirm transaction legitimacy often falls on users, which can be overwhelming.

Ecosystem Maturity and Resource Constraints

Web2 giants have invested billions over decades fostering developer communities, design systems, and customer support infrastructure. In contrast, Web3 is still an emerging ecosystem characterized by:

Smaller Development Teams: Many dApps are developed by startups or hobbyists with limited UX expertise or resources.
Rapidly Evolving Protocols: Frequent changes impact stability and user familiarity.
Limited Educational Resources: Users often lack accessible tutorials and support channels.

Such factors contribute to a user experience that feels fragmented and inaccessible to mainstream audiences.

Leveraging AI and Analytics to Improve Web3 UX

Emerging tools powered by artificial intelligence and data analytics can help mitigate some UX challenges in Web3 by:

Analyzing User Interaction Data: Identifying pain points and optimizing workflows in dApps.
Automated Risk Assessment: Platforms like Token Metrics offer AI-driven analysis to help users understand token metrics and project fundamentals, supporting better-informed user decisions without direct financial advice.
Personalized User Guidance: Contextual prompts and chatbot assistants could help users navigate complex steps.

Integrating such AI-driven research and analytic tools enables developers and users to progressively enhance Web3 usability.

Practical Tips for Users and Developers

For users trying to adapt to Web3 environments, the following tips may help:

Engage with Educational Content: Prioritize learning foundational blockchain concepts to reduce confusion.
Use Trusted Tools: Platforms providing in-depth analytics and ratings, such as Token Metrics, can offer valuable insights into projects.
Start with Simple dApps: Experiment with established, user-friendly applications before engaging in more complex services.

For developers, focusing on the following can improve UX outcomes:

Adopt Consistent UI/UX Patterns: Align interfaces with familiar Web2 standards where possible to flatten the learning curve.
Enhance Feedback and Transparency: Clearly communicate transaction statuses and risks.
Streamline Onboarding: Reduce or abstract away wallet configurations and gas fee complexities.
Prioritize Accessibility: Make interfaces usable for non-technical and diverse user groups.

Conclusion: Web3 UX Future Outlook

The current disparity between Web3 and Web2 user experience primarily stems from decentralization complexities, immature design ecosystems, and educational gaps. However, ongoing innovation in AI-driven analytics, comprehensive rating platforms like Token Metrics, and community-driven UX improvements are promising. Over time, these efforts could bridge the UX divide to make Web3 more accessible and user-friendly for mainstream adoption.

Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice or an endorsement. Users should conduct their own research and consider risks before engaging in any blockchain or cryptocurrency activities.

Research

Exploring the Languages Used for Smart Contract Development

Token Metrics Team

MIN

Introduction

Smart contracts have become an integral part of blockchain technology, enabling automated, trustless agreements across various platforms. Understanding what languages are used for smart contract development is essential for developers entering this dynamic field, as well as for analysts and enthusiasts who want to deepen their grasp of blockchain ecosystems. This article offers an analytical and educational overview of popular programming languages for smart contract development, discusses their characteristics, and provides insights on how analytical tools like Token Metrics can assist in evaluating smart contract projects.

Popular Smart Contract Languages

Smart contract languages are specialized programming languages designed to create logic that runs on blockchains. The most prominent blockchain for smart contracts currently is Ethereum, but other blockchains have their languages as well. The following section outlines some of the most widely-used smart contract languages.

Solidity: Often considered the standard language for Ethereum smart contracts, Solidity is a high-level, contract-oriented language similar in syntax to JavaScript and influenced by C++ and Python. It is statically typed and supports inheritance, libraries, and complex user-defined types. Solidity is compiled into EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) bytecode executable on Ethereum and compatible blockchains.
Vyper: Developed as an alternative to Solidity, Vyper emphasizes simplicity, auditability, and security. With a syntax inspired by Python, it is designed to be more readable and to reduce the potential for errors in contract code, though it currently has fewer features than Solidity.
Rust: Rust is gaining popularity especially on blockchains like Solana, Near, and Polkadot. It is a systems programming language known for safety and performance. Rust smart contracts tend to be compiled to WebAssembly (Wasm) bytecode, enabling cross-chain compatibility and faster execution on supported platforms.
Michelson: Michelson is a low-level stack-based language used to write smart contracts on Tezos blockchain. It is designed for formal verification, allowing high-security guarantees which is important for mission-critical applications.
Move: Move is a language developed by Facebook's Diem project and adapted by blockchains like Aptos and Sui. It offers resource-oriented programming to handle digital assets safely and efficiently.
Clarity: Used primarily on the Stacks blockchain, Clarity is a decidable language, which means actions of the contract can be predicted and verified before execution. It favors safety and transparency.

Criteria for Language Selection

Developers evaluate smart contract languages based on various factors such as security, expressiveness, ease of use, and compatibility with blockchain platforms. Below are some important criteria:

Security Features: Languages like Vyper and Michelson prioritize simplicity and formal verification to minimize vulnerabilities.
Community and Ecosystem: Solidity benefits from a large developer community, extensive documentation, and extensive tooling which facilitates easier development and auditing.
Performance Efficiency: Languages compiled to Wasm such as Rust-based smart contracts can offer superior speed and reduced resource consumption.
Formal Verification and Auditing: Languages that support rigorous mathematical verification methods help ensure contract correctness and prevent exploits.
Interoperability: The ability of a smart contract to work across multiple blockchains enhances its utility and adoption.

Overview of Leading Smart Contract Languages

Solidity remains the dominant language due to Ethereum's market position and is well-suited for developers familiar with JavaScript or object-oriented paradigms. It continuously evolves with community input and protocol upgrades.

Vyper has a smaller user base but appeals to projects requiring stricter security standards, as its design deliberately omits complex features that increase vulnerabilities.

Rust is leveraged by newer chains that aim to combine blockchain decentralization with high throughput and low latency. Developers familiar with systems programming find Rust a robust choice.

Michelson’s niche is in formal verification-heavy projects where security is paramount, such as financial contracts and governance mechanisms on Tezos.

Move and Clarity represent innovative approaches to contract safety and complexity management, focusing on deterministic execution and resource constraints.

How AI Research Tools Support Smart Contract Analysis

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning have become increasingly valuable in analyzing and researching blockchain projects, including smart contracts. Platforms such as Token Metrics provide AI-driven ratings and insights by analyzing codebases, developer activity, and on-chain data.

Such tools facilitate the identification of patterns that might indicate strong development practices or potential security risks. While they do not replace manual code audits or thorough research, they support investors and developers by presenting data-driven evaluations that help in filtering through numerous projects.

Practical Considerations for Developers and Analysts

Developers choosing a smart contract language should consider the blockchain platform’s restrictions and the nature of the application. Those focused on DeFi might prefer Solidity or Vyper for Ethereum, while teams aiming for cross-chain applications might lean toward Rust or Move.

Analysts seeking to understand a project’s robustness can utilize resources like Token Metrics for AI-powered insights combined with manual research, including code reviews and community engagement.

Security should remain a priority as vulnerabilities in smart contract code can lead to significant issues. Therefore, familiarizing oneself with languages that encourage safer programming paradigms contributes to better outcomes.

Conclusion

Understanding what languages are used for smart contract development is key to grasping the broader blockchain ecosystem. Solidity leads the field due to Ethereum’s prominence, but alternative languages like Vyper, Rust, Michelson, Move, and Clarity offer different trade-offs in security, performance, and usability. Advances in AI-driven research platforms such as Token Metrics play a supportive role in evaluating the quality and safety of smart contract projects.

Disclaimer

This article is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult professionals before making decisions related to blockchain technologies and smart contract development.

Token Metrics Media LLC is a regular publication of information, analysis, and commentary focused especially on blockchain technology and business, cryptocurrency, blockchain-based tokens, market trends, and trading strategies.

Token Metrics Media LLC does not provide individually tailored investment advice and does not take a subscriber’s or anyone’s personal circumstances into consideration when discussing investments; nor is Token Metrics Advisers LLC registered as an investment adviser or broker-dealer in any jurisdiction.

Information contained herein is not an offer or solicitation to buy, hold, or sell any security. The Token Metrics team has advised and invested in many blockchain companies. A complete list of their advisory roles and current holdings can be viewed here: https://tokenmetrics.com/disclosures.html/

Token Metrics Media LLC relies on information from various sources believed to be reliable, including clients and third parties, but cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of that information. Additionally, Token Metrics Media LLC does not provide tax advice, and investors are encouraged to consult with their personal tax advisors.

All investing involves risk, including the possible loss of money you invest, and past performance does not guarantee future performance. Ratings and price predictions are provided for informational and illustrative purposes, and may not reflect actual future performance.

Sign up in seconds