Research

Layer 2 Wars Heat Up: Analyzing the Competition Between Established and Emerging Ethereum Scaling Solutions

The Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem is experiencing unprecedented growth and competition as new solutions launch with substantial backing while established players fight to maintain market share. The recent launch of Linea, developed by Consensys and MetaMask teams, with $750 million in venture funding and an immediate $1.8 billion total value locked (TVL), highlights how competitive this space has become.
Talha Ahmad
5 min
MIN

The Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem is experiencing unprecedented growth and competition as new solutions launch with substantial backing while established players fight to maintain market share. The recent launch of Linea, developed by Consensys and MetaMask teams, with $750 million in venture funding and an immediate $1.8 billion total value locked (TVL), highlights how competitive this space has become.

The Current Layer 2 Landscape

Ethereum's scaling challenges have created a diverse ecosystem of Layer 2 solutions, each pursuing different technical approaches and market strategies. The landscape includes established players like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon, alongside newer entrants leveraging zero-knowledge proofs and other advanced cryptographic techniques.

Linea represents the latest high-profile entry, utilizing ZK-rollup technology while maintaining strong connections to Ethereum's core development community. With backing from major technology corporations including Microsoft, MasterCard, and SoftBank, the project launched with more TVL than many established Layer 1 blockchains, including SEI and Aptos, and approaching the $2 billion TVL of Sui.

This immediate scale reflects both the maturation of Layer 2 infrastructure and the increasing sophistication of launch strategies in the space. Rather than gradual adoption, well-funded projects can now achieve substantial initial usage through strategic partnerships and ecosystem incentives.

Technical Differentiation Strategies

The Layer 2 space has evolved beyond simple throughput improvements to focus on specific use cases and technical advantages:

Zero-Knowledge Technology: Projects like Linea, Scroll, and zkSync focus on zero-knowledge proofs for enhanced privacy and faster finality. These solutions offer theoretical advantages in security and decentralization compared to optimistic rollups, though often at the cost of complexity and computational requirements.

Specialized Applications: Some Layer 2 solutions target specific applications or industries. Derivatives-focused platforms like Hyperliquid have built their own chains optimized for high-frequency trading, achieving significant market share through vertical integration.

Cross-Chain Compatibility: Newer projects emphasize interoperability, allowing users to interact with multiple blockchains through unified interfaces. This approach addresses the fragmentation challenges created by the proliferation of different scaling solutions.

Developer Experience: Projects differentiate through developer tools, programming language support, and integration capabilities. Flare Network, for example, supports multiple programming languages including Solidity, JavaScript, Python, and Go, targeting developers seeking familiar development environments.

Market Dynamics and Competitive Positioning

The Layer 2 market demonstrates several key competitive dynamics:

First-Mover Advantages: Established Layer 2s benefit from developer mindshare, user familiarity, and ecosystem development. Arbitrum and Optimism maintain significant portions of Layer 2 TVL through early market entry and continuous development.

Venture Capital Influence: Well-funded projects can invest heavily in ecosystem development, security audits, and user acquisition. Linea's $750 million funding enables aggressive market expansion strategies that smaller competitors cannot match.

Exchange Integration: Access to major centralized exchanges significantly impacts adoption. Projects with Binance, Coinbase, and other top-tier exchange listings gain substantial advantages in user onboarding and liquidity provision.

Corporate Partnerships: Strategic relationships with major technology companies provide credibility and potential integration opportunities. Linea's consortium model, including Consensys, Eigen Labs, and ENS, demonstrates how core Ethereum relationships translate into competitive advantages.

The Economics of Layer 2 Competition

Layer 2 solutions face complex economic challenges in balancing user costs, security, and profitability:

Fee Competition: Users increasingly expect low transaction costs, creating pressure on Layer 2 solutions to minimize fees while maintaining security and decentralization. Ethereum's recent fee reductions through Blob technology have intensified this competition.

Token Economics: Many Layer 2 projects issue tokens for governance and value capture, but designing sustainable tokenomics remains challenging. Projects must balance user incentives with long-term economic sustainability.

Revenue Models: Different approaches to revenue generation create various competitive dynamics. Some projects focus on transaction fees, others on ecosystem development, and some on specialized services like data availability or computation.

Ecosystem Development: Attracting and retaining developers and projects requires ongoing investment in tooling, documentation, and financial incentives. This creates significant ongoing costs that must be balanced against revenue generation.

Centralized Exchange Competition and Base Token Speculation

The recent announcement that Coinbase's Base chain is exploring a native token launch has significant implications for the Layer 2 space. Base has already achieved substantial adoption without a token, suggesting strong underlying demand for Coinbase-affiliated infrastructure.

A Base token could potentially achieve top-10 market capitalization given Coinbase's position as a publicly traded company focused on shareholder value creation. The comparison to Binance's BNB, which trades at over $130 billion fully diluted valuation as the fifth-largest cryptocurrency, suggests substantial value creation potential.

This development highlights how centralized exchanges with established user bases can rapidly gain market share in the Layer 2 space through vertical integration. Unlike venture-backed Layer 2 projects that must acquire users organically, exchange-affiliated solutions inherit existing customer relationships and distribution channels.

Emerging Competitive Threats

Beyond traditional Layer 2 solutions, several emerging trends create additional competitive pressure:

Solana's Resurgence: Solana's performance recovery and growing DeFi ecosystem provides an alternative to Ethereum scaling solutions. With TVL reaching new all-time highs above $15 billion, Solana demonstrates that Layer 1 solutions can compete effectively with Layer 2 approaches.

Application-Specific Chains: Projects building their own chains for specific applications, like Hyperliquid for derivatives trading, bypass Layer 2 solutions entirely while achieving superior performance for targeted use cases.

Cross-Chain Infrastructure: Improvements in cross-chain bridge technology and interoperability protocols reduce the friction of moving between different blockchain ecosystems, decreasing the importance of any single scaling solution.

Alternative Scaling Approaches: Technologies like state channels, sidechains, and hybrid solutions provide additional options for developers seeking scaling solutions without the complexity of traditional Layer 2 integration.

User Experience and Adoption Patterns

Despite technical improvements, user experience remains a key differentiator in the Layer 2 space:

Wallet Integration: Seamless wallet support significantly impacts user adoption. Projects with native support in popular wallets like MetaMask gain advantages in user onboarding and transaction completion.

Cross-Chain Asset Management: Users increasingly expect unified interfaces for managing assets across multiple chains. Layer 2 solutions that simplify cross-chain interactions gain competitive advantages.

Application Ecosystem: The availability of familiar applications and services drives user adoption more than underlying technical capabilities. Layer 2 solutions must attract established DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, and other user-facing applications.

Educational Resources: User education about Layer 2 benefits and usage patterns remains crucial for adoption. Projects investing in documentation, tutorials, and community education see better retention rates.

Regulatory Considerations and Compliance

Layer 2 solutions face evolving regulatory requirements that create additional competitive factors:

Decentralization Requirements: Regulatory authorities increasingly scrutinize the decentralization of blockchain networks. Layer 2 solutions must balance operational efficiency with decentralization requirements.

Compliance Infrastructure: Projects serving institutional users must implement compliance tools, reporting capabilities, and regulatory interfaces. This creates barriers to entry while providing advantages to well-funded projects.

Geographic Restrictions: Different regulatory approaches across jurisdictions require Layer 2 solutions to implement geographic restrictions and compliance measures that impact user experience and adoption.

Future Outlook and Strategic Implications

The Layer 2 landscape will likely continue consolidating around solutions that can achieve sustainable competitive advantages:

Technical Excellence Alone Insufficient: Superior technology without strong distribution, funding, or partnerships may not guarantee success in the increasingly competitive environment.

Ecosystem Development Critical: Long-term success depends on attracting and retaining developers, projects, and users through ongoing ecosystem investment and support.

Specialization vs. Generalization: Projects must choose between targeting broad markets with general-purpose solutions or focusing on specific niches with optimized capabilities.

Financial Sustainability: Revenue generation and path to profitability become increasingly important as venture capital funding becomes more selective and expensive.

The Layer 2 wars represent a microcosm of broader blockchain ecosystem competition, where technical capabilities, financial resources, strategic partnerships, and execution quality all contribute to market success. As the space matures, users and developers benefit from improved options and competitive pressure driving innovation, while investors must carefully evaluate which solutions can achieve sustainable market positions in an increasingly crowded landscape.

The emergence of well-funded projects like Linea alongside speculation about major exchange tokens like Base suggests the Layer 2 space will continue evolving rapidly, with significant implications for Ethereum's scaling roadmap and the broader blockchain ecosystem's development trajectory.

‍

Build Smarter Crypto Apps &
AI Agents in Minutes, Not Months
Real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API.
Grab a Free API Key
Token Metrics Team
Token Metrics Team

Recent Posts

Research

Designing Robust REST APIs for Modern Apps

Token Metrics Team
5
MIN

REST APIs are the lingua franca of web services: lightweight, stateless, and widely supported. Whether you are integrating microservices, exposing data to frontend apps, or connecting AI agents to external data sources, understanding REST API fundamentals helps teams design reliable, maintainable interfaces. This guide explains core concepts, design trade-offs, and practical measures to evaluate and harden REST APIs without providing investment guidance.

Overview: What a REST API Is and When to Use It

Representational State Transfer (REST) is an architectural style that uses standard HTTP verbs and resource-oriented URLs to manipulate resources. A REST API typically exchanges JSON payloads and relies on stateless requests, making it easy to cache and scale. Use REST when you need a simple, interoperable protocol for CRUD-style operations, public data endpoints, or when wide client compatibility is important.

REST is not the only option—GraphQL, gRPC, and event-driven architectures address different needs—but REST remains a pragmatic choice for many services because of tooling, familiarity, and HTTP ecosystem support.

Design Principles: Resources, Versioning, and Consistency

Good REST design follows predictable patterns so clients can discover and consume APIs with low friction. Key principles include:

  • Resource-based URIs: Model nouns rather than actions (e.g., /users/{id}/orders).
  • Use HTTP verbs: GET for reads, POST for creation, PUT/PATCH for updates, DELETE for removal.
  • Consistent status codes: 200 for success, 201 for resource creation, 4xx for client errors, 5xx for server errors.
  • Versioning strategy: Implement clear versioning (URI versioning like /v1/, header-based, or content negotiation) to evolve without breaking clients.
  • Hypermedia as needed: HATEOAS can improve discoverability but adds complexity; weigh trade-offs by client needs.

Document endpoints, request/response schemas, and error formats consistently so consumers can implement robust integrations and automated tests.

Security & Authentication: Practical Safeguards

Security is non-negotiable for any public-facing API. Implement layered defenses and clear authentication methods:

  • Authentication: Use OAuth 2.0 for delegated access or token-based schemes (JWT) for service-to-service communication. Clearly document token lifetimes and refresh flows.
  • Authorization: Enforce least privilege with role- or scope-based checks on endpoints.
  • Transport security: Require TLS for all traffic and disable weak ciphers.
  • Input validation: Validate payloads, sanitize inputs, and apply strict schema checks to mitigate injection and malformed data risks.
  • Rate limiting and throttling: Protect infrastructure and prevent abuse by enforcing limits per key or IP.

Security posture should be regularly audited and complemented by monitoring for anomalous behavior and automated alerts.

Performance & Scalability: Caching, Pagination, and Rate Limits

Scalability depends on predictable resource consumption and efficient data handling:

  • Caching: Use HTTP cache headers (Cache-Control, ETag) to reduce backend load for idempotent GET requests.
  • Pagination and filtering: For large collections, prefer cursor-based pagination to avoid expensive offset scans. Support server-side filtering and sorting to limit payload sizes.
  • Asynchronous patterns: For long-running tasks, provide job endpoints and webhooks or polling endpoints rather than blocking requests.
  • Rate limiting: Communicate limits via headers and return clear error codes (e.g., 429) with retry semantics.

Design for observability: expose metrics (latency, error rates), structured logging, and traces to diagnose bottlenecks and scale capacity proactively.

Integration with AI and Crypto Systems: Data Needs and Reliability

REST APIs often serve as the glue between data providers, AI agents, and crypto platforms. When integrating AI or on-chain data consumers, consider:

  • Deterministic schemas: AI pipelines prefer stable field names and types. Use versioning to evolve schemas safely.
  • Throughput and latency: Real-time agents may require low-latency endpoints and websocket complements; REST remains suitable for many batch and metadata queries.
  • Data provenance: For crypto-related data, include timestamps, source identifiers, and optional cryptographic proofs if available.
  • Rate and cost considerations: Some providers throttle or bill per request—design clients to batch requests and respect limits.

AI-driven research platforms can augment API workflows by scoring endpoints for reliability and signal quality. For example, tools like Token Metrics illustrate how analysis layers can be combined with data feeds to inform system-level decisions.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

FAQ: What is the difference between REST and RESTful?

"REST" refers to the architectural constraints defined by Roy Fielding. "RESTful" typically describes APIs that adhere to some or most of those constraints—resource-oriented URLs, statelessness, and use of HTTP verbs. In practice, many APIs are partially RESTful and combine patterns tailored to product needs.

FAQ: How should I version my REST API?

Common approaches include URI versioning (e.g., /v1/), request header versioning, or content negotiation. URI versioning is explicit and simple for clients; header versioning can be cleaner but requires strict client-server coordination. Choose a strategy and document deprecation timelines clearly.

FAQ: What are best practices for error handling?

Return consistent, machine-readable error objects with status codes, an error code, and a descriptive message. Include retry hints for transient failures and avoid exposing internal implementation details in error text.

FAQ: How do I test and validate a REST API?

Combine unit, integration, and contract tests. Use schema validation tools, automated API testing suites, and mock servers for CI pipelines. Contract testing helps ensure client-server compatibility across deployments.

FAQ: When should I use WebSockets or gRPC instead of REST?

Choose WebSockets for low-latency bidirectional streams (e.g., live feeds). gRPC can be preferable for internal microservices where binary performance and strict schemas are important. REST remains strong for broad compatibility and human-readable APIs.

Disclaimer

This article is educational and technical in nature. It does not provide financial, legal, or investment advice. Implementation choices depend on your project requirements, risk tolerance, and regulatory context. Validate architecture and security decisions with appropriate experts before production deployment.

Research

Modern API Development Best Practices

Token Metrics Team
5
MIN

APIs power modern software: they connect services, enable integrations, and surface data across web, mobile, and AI systems. Effective api development combines clear design, robust security, reliable testing, and observability so teams can iterate fast without breaking integrations. This guide frames practical approaches, architectural trade-offs, and tooling choices for building maintainable APIs at scale.

What is API development?

API development is the process of designing, implementing, documenting, and maintaining application programming interfaces that expose functionality or data to clients. It spans technical disciplines: API design (URL patterns, request/response shapes), data modeling, authentication/authorization, versioning, monitoring, and developer experience (docs, SDKs, testing sandboxes).

Think of API development as a product lifecycle: define consumer use cases, design contracts, implement endpoints, validate with tests and staging environments, onboard consumers, and monitor usage to iterate. Success metrics are often qualitative (developer satisfaction) and quantitative (latency, error rates, adoption, and SLAs).

Design principles & architectures

Start with a consumer-driven approach: catalog who will call the API and why. Use interface-first design to lock contracts early and generate client code. Common architectural choices include REST, GraphQL, and gRPC; each has trade-offs:

  • REST: Simplicity and caching advantages for resource-oriented models; works well for broad public APIs.
  • GraphQL: Flexible payload shaping for front-end needs and reduced round-trips; adds complexity in caching and rate-limiting.
  • gRPC: Low-latency binary protocol for inter-service communication, ideal for microservices environments.

Key design practices:

  • Version your API using semantic strategies (URI-based v1/v2 or header-based negotiation) and communicate migration paths.
  • Design predictable, consistent error responses and document status codes and error schemas.
  • Model idempotency for write operations to support retries without side effects.
  • Provide client SDKs or OpenAPI/GraphQL schemas to speed adoption.

Security, testing, and performance

Security and reliability are non-negotiable. Implement the principle of least privilege for data access and separate authentication (who you are) from authorization (what you can do).

  • Authentication & authorization: Use proven standards such as OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, or mTLS where appropriate. Rotate keys and support scoped tokens for limited privileges.
  • Input validation & rate limiting: Validate payloads server-side and apply rate limits per consumer to protect backend resources.
  • Testing: Automate unit, integration, contract, and chaos tests. Contract testing (e.g., with Pact or OpenAPI validators) prevents breaking changes from reaching consumers.
  • Performance: Profile endpoints, use caching layers (CDN, edge caches), and optimize database queries. Apply circuit breakers and graceful degradation to maintain overall system health.

Scenario analysis helps prioritize hardening efforts: model the impact of a high-traffic surge, a compromised key, or a backend outage and define mitigation steps and SLOs accordingly.

AI tooling and automation for faster api development

AI and automation accelerate many facets of api development. Use code generation from OpenAPI or GraphQL schemas to produce client libraries and reduce boilerplate. Leverage automated testing frameworks to generate test cases from specification files and fuzzers to discover edge-case inputs.

For research and monitoring, AI-driven analytics can surface anomalous patterns in API usage, suggest performance regressions, and assist in prioritizing refactors. For example, integrating analytics and signal providers can help teams detect changes in on-chain or market data streams if your API exposes such feeds. Tools like Token Metrics show how AI can be used to synthesize signals and telemetry for complex data domains; similar approaches can be applied to API observability and decision support.

Practical automation checklist:

  1. Generate docs and SDKs from schemas to reduce manual errors.
  2. Implement CI pipelines that run static analysis, contract tests, and security scans on every PR.
  3. Expose telemetry (request traces, error rates, latency histograms) and use anomaly detection to trigger alerts and retrospectives.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

FAQ: What is the difference between REST and GraphQL?

REST is resource-oriented with fixed endpoints and responses; it is simple and cache-friendly. GraphQL offers flexible queries that let clients request precisely the fields they need, reducing overfetching but adding complexity in caching and query cost control.

FAQ: How do I version an API safely?

Choose a clear versioning strategy (URI segments like /v1/ or header-based negotiation). Favor additive, backward-compatible changes (new endpoints or optional fields). Communicate deprecation timelines and provide migration guides and SDK updates.

FAQ: What are the key security practices for APIs?

Use standardized auth (OAuth2/OIDC), validate inputs, enforce least privilege, rotate credentials, employ rate limits, perform regular security scanning, and maintain an incident response plan. Monitor for suspicious access patterns.

FAQ: How can AI help with API development?

AI can generate client code and documentation, suggest test cases, detect anomalies in usage patterns, and prioritize performance fixes. AI-driven analytics can aggregate telemetry to guide product and engineering decisions.

FAQ: What is contract testing and why does it matter?

Contract testing verifies that the provider's API implementation meets the consumer's expected schema and behavior. It prevents breaking changes by validating interactions in CI before deployment.

Disclaimer

This article is educational and informational. It does not constitute professional, financial, or investment advice. Descriptions of products and tools are informational only and not endorsements. Evaluate technologies and services against your organizations requirements and compliance obligations before adopting them.

Research

How API Calls Power Modern Apps

Token Metrics Team
5
MIN

APIs are the lingua franca of modern software: when one system needs data or services from another, it issues an API call. For developers and analysts working in crypto and AI, understanding the anatomy, constraints, and best practices around api calls is essential to building resilient integrations and reliable research pipelines.

What is an API call and why it matters

An API call is a request sent from a client to a server to perform an action or retrieve information. The request specifies an endpoint, method (GET, POST, etc.), headers (for authentication or metadata), and often a body (JSON or other payloads). The server processes the request and returns a response with a status code and data. In distributed systems, api calls enable modularity: microservices, exchange endpoints, data providers, and AI agents all communicate via these standardized exchanges.

For teams integrating market data, on-chain analytics, or AI models, api calls are the mechanism that moves structured data from providers to models and dashboards. Latency, reliability, and data integrity of those calls directly affect downstream analysis, model training, and user experience.

Protocols and common patterns for api calls

There are several common protocols and patterns you will encounter:

  • REST (HTTP/HTTPS): Resource-based endpoints with methods like GET, POST, PUT, DELETE and JSON payloads. It is simple and ubiquitous for public data APIs.
  • RPC (Remote Procedure Call): Calls invoke functions on a remote server (examples include JSON-RPC used by many blockchain nodes).
  • WebSocket / Streaming: Persistent connections for real-time updates, frequently used for trade feeds and live on-chain events.
  • Webhooks: Server-initiated HTTP callbacks that push events to your endpoint, useful for asynchronous notifications.

Choosing the right pattern depends on the use case: low-latency trading systems favor streaming, while periodic snapshots and historical queries are often served over REST.

Anatomy of an api call: headers, payloads, and responses

Understanding the pieces of a typical API request helps with debugging and design:

  1. Endpoint URL: The path identifying the resource or action (e.g., /v1/price or /rpc).
  2. HTTP method: GET for retrieval, POST for creation or complex queries, etc.
  3. Headers: Include authentication tokens (Bearer, API-Key), content-type, and rate-limit metadata.
  4. Body / Payload: JSON, form-encoded data, or binary blobs depending on the API.
  5. Response: Status code (200, 404, 429, 500), response body with data or error details, and headers with metadata.

Familiarity with these elements reduces time-to-diagnosis when an integration fails or returns unexpected values.

Security, authentication, and safe key management

APIs that provide privileged data or actions require robust authentication and careful key management. Common approaches include API keys, OAuth tokens, and HMAC signatures. Best practices include:

  • Use least-privilege API keys: limit scopes and rotate credentials regularly.
  • Avoid embedding keys in client-side code; store them in secure vaults or server-side environments.
  • Require HTTPS for all api calls to protect payloads in transit.
  • Log access events and monitor for anomalous usage patterns that indicate leaked keys.

These practices help prevent unauthorized access and reduce blast radius if credentials are compromised.

Rate limits, pagination, and observability for robust integrations

Service providers protect infrastructure with rate limits and pagination. Common patterns to handle these include exponential backoff for 429 responses, caching frequently requested data, and using pagination or cursor-based requests for large datasets. Observability is critical:

  • Track latency, error rates, and throughput per endpoint.
  • Implement alerting on rising error ratios or slow responses.
  • Use tracing and request IDs to correlate client logs with provider logs during investigations.

Monitoring trends in api call performance allows teams to proactively adjust retry strategies, request batching, or move to streaming alternatives when appropriate.

Testing, debugging, and staging strategies

Reliable integrations require systematic testing at multiple levels:

  • Unit tests: Mock API responses to validate client logic.
  • Integration tests: Run against staging endpoints or recorded fixtures to validate end-to-end behavior.
  • Load tests: Simulate traffic patterns to surface rate-limit issues and resource constraints.
  • Replay and sandboxing: For financial and on-chain data, use historical replays to validate processing pipelines without hitting production rate limits.

Tools like Postman, HTTP clients with built-in retries, and API schema validators (OpenAPI/Swagger) speed up development and reduce runtime surprises.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

What is an API call?

An api call is a client request to a server asking for data or to perform an action. It includes an endpoint, method, headers, and sometimes a payload; the server returns a status and response data.

REST vs RPC: which model should I use?

REST is resource-oriented and easy to cache and inspect; RPC is procedural and can be simpler for calling node functions (for example, blockchain RPC endpoints). Choose based on the data shape, latency needs, and provider options.

How do I handle rate limits and 429 errors?

Implement exponential backoff, respect Retry-After headers when provided, batch requests where possible, and use caching to reduce repeated queries. Monitoring helps you adapt request rates before limits are hit.

How should I secure API keys?

Store keys in server-side environments or secrets managers, rotate keys regularly, limit scopes, and never commit them to source control. Use environment variables and access controls to minimize exposure.

What tools help test and debug api calls?

Postman, curl, HTTP client libraries, OpenAPI validators, and request-tracing tools are useful. Unit and integration tests with mocked responses catch regressions early.

Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It explains technical concepts related to api calls and integration practices and does not provide financial, investment, or trading advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult appropriate professionals before acting on technical or market-related information.

Choose from Platinum, Gold, and Silver packages
Reach with 25–30% open rates and 0.5–1% CTR
Craft your own custom ad—from banners to tailored copy
Perfect for Crypto Exchanges, SaaS Tools, DeFi, and AI Products