Crypto Basics

Liquid Staking - A Comprehensive Guide to Getting Started

Learn everything about liquid staking with our detailed guide. Check how to start and unleash the potential for passive income in the crypto space.
Marcus K
8 Minutes
MIN

Cryptocurrency enthusiasts are always on the lookout for new and innovative ways to make the most of their digital assets. One such method that has been gaining traction in recent years is liquid staking. 

This approach allows users to stake their tokens in proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchains while maintaining liquidity and participating in other decentralized finance (DeFi) activities. 

In this article, we will explore the concept of liquid staking, how it works, its advantages and disadvantages, popular cryptocurrencies that support this method, and how you can get started.

Understanding Staking and Its Benefits

Before delving into liquid staking, it's essential to grasp the concept of staking and its benefits. Staking involves locking up a certain amount of tokens in a PoS blockchain network to support its operations and security. 

In return for staking, participants can earn rewards in the form of additional tokens. Staking provides several benefits, such as incentivizing token holders to act in the network's best interest and maintaining the blockchain's security and integrity.

What is Liquid Staking?

Liquid staking takes the traditional staking model a step further by allowing users to stake their tokens and receive a separate token, known as a liquid staking token (LST), in return. 

These LSTs represent ownership of the staked tokens and can be freely traded, used in DeFi protocols, or transferred to other users. This innovative approach allows users to access liquidity and utilize their staked assets while potentially earning staking rewards.

How Does Liquid Staking Work?

Liquid staking involves a three-step process: staking, issuing liquid staking tokens, and unstaking. The first step is similar to traditional staking, where users lock their tokens in a designated smart contract on a liquid staking platform. The platform then verifies the tokens' legitimacy and stores them securely.

In the next phase, the platform issues the users liquid staking tokens (LSTs) as receipts for their staked assets. 

These LSTs are pegged to the value of the original tokens and can be used in various DeFi protocols and blockchain applications. The platform also utilizes the staked assets for native staking, earning rewards from securing the PoS blockchain.

When users decide to unstake their tokens, they must burn the corresponding LSTs. This process typically incurs a fee, and the platform verifies the burn transaction on-chain before returning the unstaked tokens to the user. 

It's important to note that liquid staking platforms may also impose a bonding period, during which users may have to wait before receiving their unstaked tokens.

Advantages of Liquid Staking

Liquid staking offers several advantages over traditional staking methods. Firstly, it provides increased accessibility and flexibility to users. 

Unlike traditional staking, which often requires a bonding period, liquid staking allows users to unstake their tokens and access liquidity immediately. This flexibility enables efficient capital allocation and utilizing staked assets in other financial activities.

Secondly, liquid staking enhances the liquidity of staked assets. Traditional staking typically locks up the tokens for a specific period, restricting their use and trading. With liquid staking, users receive LSTs that can be freely traded, swapped, or used as collateral in lending protocols. 

This additional liquidity opens up a world of possibilities for users, allowing them to maximize the utility of their staked assets.

Liquid staking also promotes the composability of DeFi protocols. By enabling users to use their LSTs in various DeFi platforms, liquid staking enhances the interoperability and integration of different applications within the decentralized ecosystem. 

Users can lend, borrow, or participate in yield farming using their LSTs, increasing their engagement and potential returns.

Lastly, liquid staking may offer higher rewards compared to traditional staking. Users can earn additional rewards on top of their original staking rewards by utilizing LSTs in multiple staking platforms. 

This strategy allows for the optimization of staking returns without the need for additional investments.

Disadvantages of Liquid Staking

While liquid staking offers numerous advantages, it's important to consider this method's potential risks and challenges. One significant risk is the possibility of smart contract vulnerabilities. 

Since liquid staking involves interacting with smart contracts, there is a chance of exploitation if a flaw or bug exists in the code. Choosing reputable and audited liquid staking platforms to mitigate this risk is crucial.

Another challenge is the potential for price volatility. LSTs are pegged to the value of the original tokens, but there is a risk of de-pegging if market conditions fluctuate significantly. 

If the LSTs' value deviates from the underlying assets, users may experience losses when trading or redeeming their LSTs. It's essential to closely monitor market conditions and assess the risks before engaging in liquid staking.

Additionally, liquid staking may involve higher fees compared to traditional staking. Liquid staking platforms often charge fees for the issuance and burning of LSTs, as well as network transaction fees. 

These costs can impact the overall profitability of liquid staking, especially for users with smaller staking amounts.

Staking Vs. Liquid Staking: Key Differences

It's important to distinguish between traditional staking and liquid staking to understand their unique characteristics. 

Traditional staking involves locking up tokens in a smart contract without the ability to use or transfer them until the staking period ends. Stakers earn rewards solely from staking activities.

On the other hand, liquid staking provides users with a receipt token (LST) that represents ownership of the staked assets. These LSTs are freely transferable and can be used in DeFi protocols, providing users with additional liquidity and utility. 

Liquid staking enables users to potentially earn rewards while still participating in other blockchain activities, offering a more flexible approach compared to traditional staking.

Popular Crypto That Supports Liquid Staking

Liquid staking has gained significant traction across various blockchain networks, with several cryptocurrencies supporting this innovative method. 

Ethereum, one of the largest and most well-known blockchains, has implemented liquid staking following its transition to a PoS consensus mechanism. 

Users can stake their ETH and receive liquid staking tokens (LSTs), such as stETH, which can be used in DeFi protocols and traded on supported platforms.

Other popular cryptocurrencies that support liquid staking include Polkadot, Cardano, Avalanche, and Cosmos. Each of these projects offers its own liquid staking solutions, allowing users to stake their tokens and benefit from the advantages of liquidity and additional utility.

How to Start Liquid Staking?

If you're interested in participating in liquid staking, choosing a reputable and secure platform that supports this method is essential. 

Ledger, a prominent cryptocurrency hardware wallet provider, offers a liquid staking platform through its Ledger Live ecosystem. 

Connecting your Ledger device to Ledger Live and navigating to the Discover tab allows you to explore liquid staking options available on supported networks such as Polygon, Hedera, BNB, Near, Terra 2.0, and Fantom.

By utilizing Ledger's secure infrastructure, you can stake your tokens, receive liquid staking tokens (LSTs), and participate in the vibrant world of DeFi while maintaining full control and custody of your assets.

Conclusion

Liquid staking is an innovative approach to maximize the potential of your crypto assets. By combining the benefits of staking with increased liquidity and utility, liquid staking offers users a flexible and efficient way to participate in PoS networks while enjoying the opportunities provided by DeFi protocols. 

It's important to weigh the advantages and disadvantages, consider the risks, and choose reliable platforms to ensure a successful liquid staking experience. 

With the growing adoption and development of liquid staking solutions, this method is poised to play a significant role in the future of blockchain-based finance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. How is liquid staking different from traditional staking?

Liquid staking allows users to maintain liquidity and utilize their staked assets, while traditional staking locks up tokens for a specific period without the ability to use or transfer them until the staking period ends.

Q2. Which cryptocurrencies support liquid staking?

Popular cryptocurrencies that support liquid staking include Ethereum, Polkadot, Cardano, Avalanche, and Cosmos. Each project offers its own solutions for users to participate in liquid staking.

Q3. How can I start liquid staking?

To start liquid staking, choose a reputable platform that supports this method, such as Ledger's liquid staking platform. Connect your Ledger device to Ledger Live, explore the available options, and stake your tokens while maintaining full control of your assets.

Q4. Is liquid staking safe?

Liquid staking carries risks, such as smart contract vulnerabilities and price volatility. It's crucial to choose secure platforms, conduct thorough research, and stay informed about potential risks and developments in the cryptocurrency space.

Q5. Can I unstake my tokens in liquid staking?

Users can unstake their tokens in liquid staking by burning the corresponding liquid staking tokens (LSTs). However, the process may involve fees, and a bonding period may exist before users can receive their unstaked tokens.

Q6. What is the future of liquid staking?

Liquid staking is expected to play a significant role in the future of blockchain-based finance. As more projects adopt and develop liquid staking solutions, users can expect increased accessibility, liquidity, and integration with DeFi protocols, further enhancing the potential of their crypto assets.

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other advice, and you should not treat any of the website's content as such.

Token Metrics does not recommend buying, selling, or holding any cryptocurrency. Conduct your due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps &
AI Agents in Minutes, Not Months
Real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API.
Grab a Free API Key
Token Metrics Team
Token Metrics Team

Recent Posts

Research

API Gateway: Architecture, Patterns & Best Practices

Token Metrics Team
5
MIN

Modern distributed systems rely on effective traffic control, security, and observability at the edge. An API gateway centralizes those responsibilities, simplifying client access to microservices and serverless functions. This guide explains what an API gateway does, common architectural patterns, deployment and performance trade-offs, and design best practices for secure, scalable APIs.

What is an API Gateway?

An API gateway is a server-side component that sits between clients and backend services. It performs request routing, protocol translation, aggregation, authentication, rate limiting, and metrics collection. Instead of exposing each service directly, teams present a single, consolidated API surface to clients through the gateway. This centralization reduces client complexity, standardizes cross-cutting concerns, and can improve operational control.

Think of an API gateway as a policy and plumbing layer: it enforces API contracts, secures endpoints, and implements traffic shaping while forwarding requests to appropriate services.

Core Features and Architectural Patterns

API gateways vary in capability but commonly include:

  • Routing and reverse proxy: Direct requests to the correct backend based on path, headers, or other criteria.
  • Authentication and authorization: Validate tokens (JWT, OAuth2), integrate with identity providers, and enforce access policies.
  • Rate limiting and quotas: Protect backend services from overload and manage multi-tenant usage.
  • Request/response transformation: Convert between protocols (HTTP/gRPC), reshape payloads, or aggregate multiple service calls.
  • Observability: Emit metrics, traces, and structured logs for monitoring and debugging.

Common patterns include:

  1. Edge gateway: A public-facing gateway handling authentication, CDN integration, and basic traffic management.
  2. Internal gateway: Placed inside the trust boundary to manage east-west traffic within a cluster or VPC.
  3. Aggregating gateway: Combines multiple backend responses into a single client payload, useful for mobile or low-latency clients.
  4. Per-tenant gateway: For multi-tenant platforms, separate gateways per customer enforce isolation and custom policies.

Deployment Models and Performance Considerations

Choosing where and how to deploy an API gateway affects performance, resilience, and operational cost. Key models include:

  • Managed cloud gateways: Providers offer scalable gateways with minimal operational overhead. They simplify TLS, identity integration, and autoscaling but can introduce vendor lock-in and per-request costs.
  • Self-managed gateways: Run on Kubernetes or VMs for full control over configuration and plugins. This model increases operational burden but enables custom routing logic and deep integration with internal systems.
  • Sidecar or service mesh complement: In service mesh architectures, a gateway can front the mesh, delegating fine-grained service-to-service policies to sidecar proxies.

Performance trade-offs to monitor:

  • Latency: Each hop through the gateway adds processing time. Use lightweight filters, compiled rules, and avoid heavy transformations on hot paths.
  • Concurrency: Ensure the gateway and backend services scale independently. Backpressure, circuit breakers, and backoff strategies help prevent cascading failures.
  • Caching: Edge caching can drastically reduce load and latency for idempotent GET requests. Consider cache invalidation and cache-control headers carefully.

Design Best Practices and Security Controls

Adopt practical rules to keep gateways maintainable and secure:

  • Limit business logic: Keep the gateway responsible for orchestration and policy enforcement, not core business rules.
  • Token-based auth and scopes: Use scoped tokens and short lifetimes for session tokens. Validate signatures and token claims at the gateway level.
  • Observability-first: Emit structured logs, metrics, and distributed traces. Correlate gateway logs with backend traces for faster root cause analysis.
  • Throttling and quotas: Set conservative defaults and make limits configurable per client or plan. Implement graceful degradation for overloaded backends.
  • Policy-driven config: Use declarative policies (e.g., YAML or CRDs) to version and review gateway rules rather than ad-hoc runtime changes.

AI and analytics tools can accelerate gateway design and operating decisions by surfacing traffic patterns, anomaly detection, and vulnerability signals. For example, products that combine real-time telemetry with model-driven insights help prioritize which endpoints need hardened policies.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

What is an API gateway vs service mesh?

These technologies complement rather than replace each other. The API gateway handles north-south traffic (client to cluster), enforcing authentication and exposing public endpoints. A service mesh focuses on east-west traffic (service-to-service), offering fine-grained routing, mTLS, and telemetry between microservices. Many architectures use a gateway at the edge and a mesh internally for granular control.

FAQ: Common Questions About API Gateways

How does an API gateway impact latency?

A gateway introduces processing overhead for each request, which can increase end-to-end latency. Mitigations include optimizing filters, enabling HTTP/2 multiplexing, using local caches, and scaling gateway instances horizontally.

Do I need an API gateway for every architecture?

Not always. Small monoliths or single-service deployments may not require a gateway. For microservices, public APIs, or multi-tenant platforms, a gateway adds value by centralizing cross-cutting concerns and simplifying client integrations.

What security measures should the gateway enforce?

At minimum, the gateway should enforce TLS, validate authentication tokens, apply rate limits, and perform input validation. Additional controls include IP allowlists, web application firewall (WAF) rules, and integration with identity providers for RBAC.

Can API gateways aggregate responses from multiple services?

Yes. Aggregation reduces client round trips by composing responses from multiple backends. Use caching and careful error handling to avoid coupling performance of one service to another.

How do I test and version gateway policies?

Use a staging environment to run synthetic loads and functional tests against gateway policies. Store configurations in version control, run CI checks for syntax and policy conflicts, and roll out changes via canary deployments.

Is it better to use a managed gateway or self-host?

Managed gateways reduce operational overhead and provide scalability out of the box, while self-hosted gateways offer deeper customization and potentially lower long-term costs. Choose based on team expertise, compliance needs, and expected traffic patterns.

Disclaimer

This article is for educational and technical information only. It does not constitute investment, legal, or professional advice. Readers should perform their own due diligence when selecting and configuring infrastructure components.

Research

RESTful API Essentials: Design, Security, and Best Practices

Token Metrics Team
5
MIN

APIs are the connective tissue of modern applications; among them, RESTful APIs remain a dominant style because they map cleanly to HTTP semantics and scale well across distributed systems. This article breaks down what a RESTful API is, pragmatic design patterns, security controls, and practical monitoring and testing workflows. If you build or consume APIs, understanding these fundamentals reduces integration friction and improves reliability.

What is a RESTful API?

A RESTful API (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style for designing networked applications. At its core, REST leverages standard HTTP verbs (GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE) and status codes to perform operations on uniquely identified resources, typically represented as URLs. Key characteristics include:

  • Statelessness: Each request contains all information the server needs to fulfill it, enabling horizontal scaling.
  • Resource orientation: APIs expose resources (users, orders, blocks, etc.) rather than remote procedure calls.
  • Uniform interface: A consistent set of conventions for requests and responses, improving discoverability and client simplicity.

REST is a pragmatic guideline rather than a strict protocol; many APIs labeled "RESTful" adopt REST principles while introducing pragmatic extensions (e.g., custom headers, versioning strategies).

Design Principles & Resource Modeling

Good REST design begins with clear resource modeling. Ask: what are the nouns in the domain, and how do they relate? Use predictable URL structures and rely on HTTP semantics:

  • /resources - list or create a resource (GET to list, POST to create)
  • /resources/{id} - operate on a single resource (GET, PUT/PATCH, DELETE)
  • /resources/{id}/subresources - nested relationships when needed

Design tips to improve usability and longevity:

  1. Use consistent naming: plural nouns, lowercase, and hyphenation for readability.
  2. Support versioning: include a version in the URL or headers to avoid breaking clients (e.g., /v1/...).
  3. Leverage hypermedia judiciously: HATEOAS can improve discoverability but adds complexity; choose when it benefits clients.
  4. Pagination, filtering, sorting: standardize query parameters for large collections to avoid performance pitfalls.
  5. Use appropriate status codes: communicate success, client errors, and server errors clearly (200, 201, 400, 401, 403, 404, 429, 500, etc.).

Security, Authentication, and Rate Limiting

Security is a primary concern for any public-facing API. Typical controls and patterns include:

  • Authentication: OAuth 2.0 (Bearer tokens) and API keys are common. Choose a mechanism that fits your risk model and client types. Avoid transporting credentials in URLs.
  • Authorization: Implement least-privilege checks server-side to ensure tokens only permit intended actions.
  • Encryption: Always use TLS (HTTPS) to protect data in transit; consider TLS 1.2+ and strict ciphers.
  • Rate limiting and throttling: Protect backends from abuse with per-key or per-IP limits and provide informative 429 responses with Retry-After headers.
  • Input validation and sanitization: Validate request bodies and query parameters to reduce injection and parsing vulnerabilities.
  • Audit and logging: Log authentication events, rate-limit triggers, and error patterns while respecting privacy and compliance requirements.

Designing for security also means operational readiness: automated certificate rotation, secrets management, and periodic security reviews reduce long-term risk.

Performance, Monitoring, and AI-Assisted Tooling

Performance tuning for RESTful APIs covers latency, throughput, and reliability. Practical strategies include caching (HTTP Cache-Control, ETags), connection pooling, and database query optimization. Use observability tools to collect metrics (error rates, latency percentiles), distributed traces, and structured logs for rapid diagnosis.

AI-assisted tools can accelerate many aspects of API development and operations: anomaly detection in request patterns, automated schema inference from traffic, and intelligent suggestions for endpoint design or documentation. While these tools improve efficiency, validate automated changes through testing and staged rollouts.

When selecting tooling, evaluate clarity of integrations, support for your API architecture, and the ability to export raw telemetry for custom analysis.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

What distinguishes RESTful APIs from other API styles?

REST focuses on resources and uses HTTP semantics; GraphQL centralizes queries into a single endpoint with flexible queries, and gRPC emphasizes high-performance RPCs with binary protocols. Choose based on client needs, performance constraints, and schema evolution requirements.

How should I version a RESTful API without breaking clients?

Common approaches include URL versioning (e.g., /v1/), header-based versioning, or semantic versioning of the API contract. Regardless of method, document deprecation timelines and provide migration guides and compatibility layers where possible.

What are practical testing strategies for RESTful APIs?

Combine unit tests for business logic with integration tests that exercise endpoints and mocks for external dependencies. Use contract tests to ensure backward compatibility and end-to-end tests in staging environments. Automate tests in CI/CD to catch regressions early.

How do I design for backward compatibility?

Additive changes (new fields, endpoints) are generally safe; avoid removing fields, changing response formats, or repurposing status codes. Feature flags and content negotiation can help introduce changes progressively.

What should be included in API documentation?

Provide clear endpoint descriptions, request/response examples, authentication steps, error codes, rate limits, and code samples in multiple languages. Machine-readable specs (OpenAPI/Swagger) enable client generation and testing automation.

Disclaimer: This content is educational and informational only. It does not constitute professional, legal, security, or investment advice. Test and validate any architectural, security, or operational changes in environments that match your production constraints before rollout.

Research

Practical Guide to Claude API Integration

Token Metrics Team
4
MIN

The Claude API is increasingly used to build context-aware AI assistants, document summarizers, and conversational workflows. This guide breaks down what the API offers, integration patterns, capability trade-offs, and practical safeguards to consider when embedding Claude models into production systems.

Overview: What the Claude API Provides

The Claude API exposes access to Anthropic’s Claude family of large language models. At a high level, it lets developers send prompts and structured instructions and receive text outputs, completions, or assistant-style responses. Key delivery modes typically include synchronous completions, streaming tokens for low-latency interfaces, and tools for handling multi-turn context. Understanding input/output semantics and token accounting is essential before integrating Claude into downstream applications.

Capabilities & Feature Surface

Claude models are designed for safety-focused conversational AI and often emphasize instruction following and helpfulness while applying content filters. Typical features to assess:

  • Instruction clarity: Claude responds robustly to explicit, structured instructions and system-level guidelines embedded in prompts.
  • Context handling: Larger context windows enable multi-turn memory and long-document summarization; analyze limits for your use case.
  • Streaming vs batch: Streaming reduces perceived latency in chat apps. Batch completions suit offline generation and analytics tasks.
  • Safety layers: Built-in moderation and safety heuristics can reduce harmful outputs but should not replace application-level checks.

Integration Patterns & Best Practices

Designing a robust integration with the Claude API means balancing performance, cost, and safety. Practical guidance:

  1. Prompt engineering: Build modular prompts: system instructions, user content, and optional retrieval results. Keep system prompts explicit and version-controlled.
  2. Context management: Implement truncation or document retrieval to stay within context limits. Use semantic search to surface the most relevant chunks before calling Claude.
  3. Latency strategies: Use streaming for interactive UI and batch for background processing. Cache frequent completions when possible to reduce API calls.
  4. Safety & validation: Post-process outputs with rule-based checks, content filters, or secondary moderation models to catch hallucinations or policy violations.
  5. Monitoring: Track token usage, latency percentiles, and error rates. Instrument prompts to correlate model changes with downstream metrics.

Primary Use Cases and Risk Considerations

Claude API use cases span chat assistants, summarization, prompt-driven code generation, and domain-specific Q&A. For each area evaluate these risk vectors:

  • Hallucination risk: Models may fabricate facts; rely on provenance and retrieval augmentation when answers require accuracy.
  • Privacy: Avoid sending sensitive personal data unless contract and data processing terms explicitly permit it.
  • Regulatory exposure: For regulated domains (health, legal, finance) include human oversight and compliance review rather than treating outputs as authoritative.
  • Operational cost: Longer contexts and high throughput increase token costs; profile realistic workloads before scaling.

Tools, Libraries, and Ecosystem Fit

Tooling around Claude often mirrors other LLM APIs: HTTP/SDK clients, streaming libraries, and orchestration frameworks. Combine the Claude API with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, vector stores for semantic search, and lightweight caching layers. AI-driven research platforms such as Token Metrics can complement model outputs by providing analytics and signal overlays when integrating market or on-chain data into prompts.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

FAQ — What is the Claude API?

The Claude API is an interface for sending prompts and receiving text-based model outputs from the Claude family. It supports completions, streaming responses, and multi-turn conversations, depending on the provider’s endpoints.

FAQ — How do I manage long documents and context?

Implement a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach: index documents into a vector store, use semantic search to fetch relevant segments, and summarize or stitch results before sending a concise prompt to Claude. Also consider chunking and progressive summarization when documents exceed context limits.

FAQ — How can I control API costs?

Optimize prompts to be concise, cache common responses, batch non-interactive requests, and choose lower-capacity model variants for non-critical tasks. Monitor token usage and set alerts for unexpected spikes.

FAQ — What safety measures are recommended?

Combine Claude’s built-in safety mechanisms with application-level filters, content validation, and human review workflows. Avoid sending regulated or sensitive data without proper agreements and minimize reliance on unverified outputs.

FAQ — When should I use streaming vs batch responses?

Use streaming for interactive chat interfaces where perceived latency matters. Batch completions are suitable for offline processing, analytics, and situations where full output is required before downstream steps.

Disclaimer

This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute professional, legal, or financial advice. It explains technical capabilities and integration considerations for the Claude API without endorsing specific implementations. Review service terms, privacy policies, and applicable regulations before deploying AI systems in production.

Choose from Platinum, Gold, and Silver packages
Reach with 25–30% open rates and 0.5–1% CTR
Craft your own custom ad—from banners to tailored copy
Perfect for Crypto Exchanges, SaaS Tools, DeFi, and AI Products