Crypto Basics

What is a Multisig Wallet and How it Works?

Learn everything about multisig wallets with our comprehensive guide and discover how this secure method of crypto storage functions.
S. Vishwa
11 Minutes
MIN

In the world of cryptocurrencies, security is paramount. With digital assets' increasing value and prevalence, investors and organizations are constantly seeking ways to protect their holdings from potential threats. 

One such security tool that has gained significant attention is the multisig wallet. This comprehensive guide will explore what a multisig wallet is, how it works, the different types available, the advantages and disadvantages, and the safety measures associated with these wallets.

What is a Multisig Wallet?

A multisig wallet, also known as a multi-signature wallet, is a type of cryptocurrency wallet that requires multiple signatures to execute a transaction. 

Unlike traditional wallets that rely on a single private key, multisig wallets distribute the signing authority among multiple parties. This means a defined threshold of signatures is needed to validate and authorize any transaction.

The workflow of a multisig wallet remains the same regardless of the number of signers. Any party involved in the wallet can initiate a transaction by signing it with their private key. However, the transaction remains pending until it receives the required additional signatures.

Multisig wallets can be configured in different ways. One standard setup is the N-of-N configuration, where all signatories must validate a transaction. 

For example, a 2-of-2 multisig wallet requires both parties to sign a transaction to be considered valid. Another configuration is the N-of-M setup, where a specific subset of signers must approve a transaction. 

In a 3-of-4 multisig wallet, three out of the four signers must validate the transaction for it to be executed.

To ensure maximum security, it is crucial to distribute the multisig private key access among distinct entities. Storing multiple private keys in a single location undermines the purpose of a multisig wallet, as it creates a single point of failure. 

The ideal scenario is to grant access to entities so that a single security breach does not result in the loss of multiple keys.

How Does a Multisig Wallet Work?

The concept of a multisig wallet revolves around using multiple private keys to authorize transactions. Users sign a transaction with their private key when they initiate it. The transaction is then broadcasted to the network as pending, awaiting additional signatures.

Once the required number of signatures is obtained, the transaction is considered valid and can be executed on the blockchain. This process ensures that no single party has complete control over the wallet and eliminates the risk of a single point of failure.

Let's consider an example to understand better how a multisig wallet works. Imagine a 2-of-3 multisig wallet with three signers: Alice, Bob, and Carol. When Alice wants to send funds from the wallet, she signs the transaction with her private key. The transaction is then marked as pending. 

To complete the transaction, Bob and Carol must also sign it with their respective private keys. Once all three signatures are obtained, the transaction is valid and can be executed on the blockchain.

Multisig wallets can be implemented on various blockchains, and many cryptocurrency exchanges and custodians offer multisig wallet services to enhance the security of their client's assets.

Types of Multisig Wallets

Multisig wallets come in different configurations to cater to various needs and use cases. Here are some common types of multisig wallets:

1-of-2 Signatures

A 1-of-2 multisig wallet is one of the simplest forms of multisig storage. In this setup, two private keys are bound to a single wallet, and either key can approve transactions. 

This configuration is often used in small businesses where two founders want equal control over the funds. It can also be a personal backup solution, as users can recover funds even if one private key is lost.

2-of-3 Signatures

A 2-of-3 multisig wallet requires two out of three registered signers to complete a transaction. This configuration is commonly used for escrow transactions, where a trusted third party holds one of the keys. 

Cryptocurrency custodians also implement this type of wallet as an additional security measure. They may hold two keys, one stored securely offline and the other held online for more effortless signing. 

The third key is delegated to a trusted blockchain security company, which acts as a safeguard in case one of the custodian's keys is lost.

3-of-5 Signatures

A 3-of-5 multisig wallet is a more robust configuration that requires three out of five signatures to validate transactions. This setup is functional in corporate structures where several decision-makers must approve fund transfers. 

The transaction can be approved if over 50% of the parties agree. Distributing the signatures among entities in diverse geographical locations enhances security.

Hosted vs. Unhosted

Multisig wallets can be categorized as hosted or unhosted. A hosted multisig wallet is created on a third-party platform like Coinbase Custody or BitGo. 

These platforms provide institutional-grade security solutions and offer clients access to multisig functionality. Clients can register approved signatories and define signature thresholds for fund transfers. 

On the other hand, an unhosted multisig wallet, also known as a self-hosted wallet, is where the individual or organization holds the private keys without relying on a trusted third party. 

Unhosted wallets generally require more complex setup processes and infrastructure optimization for security. However, they offer greater convenience and eliminate the counterparty risk associated with third-party custodians.

Advantages of Multisig Wallets

Multisig wallets offer several advantages, making them attractive for users seeking enhanced security and control over their digital assets. Let's explore some of the key advantages:

1. Increased Security

One of the primary benefits of using a multisig wallet is its heightened security. By requiring multiple signatures to authorize transactions, multisig wallets reduce the risk of a single point of failure. 

Each signer holds a unique private key, making it difficult for hackers to gain unauthorized access to the wallet. Even if one private key is compromised, the funds remain secure as the hacker still needs access to the other keys to complete any transaction.

Multisig wallets also offer a backup option. If one or more private keys are lost, as long as the setup does not require all signatures to validate transactions, users can quickly recover their wallets. Additional signatures can be added to distribute ownership further and improve security.

2. Escrow Transactions

Multisig wallets are ideal for escrowed transactions, where a neutral third party holds funds until predefined conditions are met. With a multisig wallet, parties can ensure all obligations are fulfilled before releasing the funds. 

For example, a buyer could deposit funds into a multisig wallet, and the seller would only receive the funds once the purchased goods are received and deemed satisfactory. The presence of a trusted third-party signatory adds an extra layer of security and prevents either party from breaching the contract terms.

3. Two-Factor Authentication (2FA)

Multi-signature wallets provide a form of two-factor authentication (2FA) for cryptocurrency transactions. To validate any pending transaction, eligible signers must provide their signatures. 

This feature adds an extra layer of security, ensuring that only authorized parties can authorize fund transfers. In the event of unauthorized access to a private key, users can easily revoke access and prevent any malicious actor from completing transactions.

4. Cooperation Between Multiple Parties

Multisig wallets are particularly useful in organizational setups where multiple parties must collaborate and make joint decisions. 

In decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and corporate structures, multisig wallets can ensure that no single party has unchecked control over the funds. 

All parties involved must provide their signatures to authorize a transaction, promoting accountability and preventing any single entity from making unauthorized transfers. Additionally, the signing of a transaction can also serve as a form of voting, representing approval of a business decision.

Disadvantages of Multisig Wallets

While multisig wallets offer increased security and control over digital assets, they also have drawbacks. It's essential to consider these disadvantages before deciding to use a multisig wallet:

1. Transaction Speed

One of the trade-offs of using a multisig wallet is the potential decrease in transaction speed. Compared to regular wallets, multisig wallets can introduce delays, requiring multiple signers to validate a transaction. 

The time it takes to complete a transaction can vary depending on the number of signatories and geographical boundaries. This limitation can make multisig wallets less convenient for emergencies or time-sensitive payments.

2. Technical Knowledge

Using a multisig wallet requires specific technical knowledge and familiarity with security practices. The setup process may involve consulting a third-party wallet provider, installing specific software, or purchasing dedicated equipment such as multiple hardware wallets and safe deposit boxes. 

These requirements can be relatively complex for the average crypto investor and may hinder the widespread adoption of multisig wallets.

3. Fund Recovery and Custodian Risk

Compared to single-key storage, recovering funds stored in a multisig wallet can be more time-consuming and require additional coordination. In the event of a lost private key or unavailable signatory, the recovery process can be complex and may involve additional security measures. 

Opting for a multisig wallet hosted by a third-party custodian also introduces counterparty risk. If the custodian experiences a security breach or fails to safeguard the private keys, it could have severe consequences for the wallet holders.

Are Multisig Wallets Safe?

While multisig wallets offer enhanced security features, it's important to note that they are not foolproof. No security measure can guarantee absolute protection against all possible threats. 

However, when used correctly and combined with other security best practices, multisig wallets can significantly reduce the risk of unauthorized access and improve the overall security of digital assets.

To ensure the safety of your multisig wallet, it's crucial to follow these best practices:

  • Choose a reputable wallet provider or implement robust self-hosted security measures.
  • Carefully select the signatories and distribute the private keys among different entities in diverse locations.
  • Regularly update and maintain the security infrastructure of the wallet.
  • Keep backup copies of all private keys in secure and separate locations.
  • Regularly monitor account activity and be vigilant for any signs of unauthorized access.
  • Stay informed about the latest security vulnerabilities and follow industry best practices.

By following these guidelines, users can maximize the security of their multisig wallets and reduce the risk of potential breaches.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. What is the difference between a multisig wallet and a regular wallet?

A regular wallet relies on a single private key to authorize transactions, while a multisig wallet requires multiple signatures from different parties to validate transactions. This added layer of security makes it more difficult for unauthorized individuals to gain control over the funds.

Q2. Can I use a multisig wallet for personal use?

Yes, multisig wallets can be used for personal use. They provide an extra layer of security for individuals who want to protect their digital assets from potential threats. However, the setup process and technical requirements may be more complex than regular wallets.

Q3. Can multisig wallets be hacked?

While no security measure is entirely immune to hacking, multisig wallets are significantly more secure than regular wallets. The distribution of private keys among multiple parties makes it more difficult for hackers to gain unauthorized access. However, it's essential to follow best practices and stay updated on the latest security vulnerabilities to minimize the risk of hacking.

Q4. Are multisig wallets suitable for small businesses?

Yes, multisig wallets can be beneficial for small businesses. They provide additional security and control over funds, especially when multiple founders or partners need equal control. However, it's essential to consider the technical requirements and potential trade-offs, such as transaction speed, before adopting a multisig wallet.

Q5. Can I recover my funds if I lose one of the private keys?

The ability to recover funds in the event of a lost private key depends on the specific setup of the multisig wallet. If the wallet does not require all signatures to validate transactions, it may be possible to recover the funds using the remaining keys. However, it's essential to have backup copies of all private keys stored in secure locations to prevent losing access to the wallet.

Conclusion

Multisig wallets provide an advanced security solution for individuals and organizations looking to protect their digital assets. By requiring multiple signatures to authorize transactions, multisig wallets reduce the risk of unauthorized access and provide an additional layer of control. 

They are particularly useful in escrow transactions, corporate structures, and scenarios where multiple parties must collaborate and make joint decisions.

While multisig wallets offer increased security, it's essential to consider the potential trade-offs, such as transaction speed and technical complexity. 

By following best practices and staying informed about the latest security vulnerabilities, users can maximize the safety of their multisig wallets and minimize the risk of potential breaches.

In conclusion, a multisig wallet is a powerful tool that can significantly enhance the security and control of digital assets. 

By understanding the workings of multisig wallets and implementing them correctly, users can enjoy peace of mind knowing that their cryptocurrencies are protected from potential threats.

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other advice, and you should not treat any of the website's content as such.

Token Metrics does not recommend that any cryptocurrency should be bought, sold, or held by you. Do conduct your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps &
AI Agents in Minutes, Not Months
Real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API.
Grab a Free API Key
Token Metrics Team
Token Metrics Team

Recent Posts

Research

Top Stablecoin Issuers & Use Cases (2025)

Sam Monac
5 min
MIN

Why stablecoin issuers matter in September 2025

Stablecoins have become crypto’s settlement rail, powering exchanges, DeFi, remittances, and payments. In 2025, clarity is improving and liquidity is consolidating—so choosing stablecoin issuers with sound reserves, clear disclosures, and fit-for-purpose design matters more than ever.
Definition: A stablecoin issuer is the organization or protocol that mints and redeems a token designed to track a reference asset (usually USD), with reserves and/or mechanisms intended to hold the peg.
This guide evaluates the leading issuers globally and maps their best use cases—from high-volume trading to compliant payments and decentralized collateral. We focus on reserves quality, transparency, networks supported, institutional access, fees, and regional eligibility. Secondary topics include “USDC vs USDT,” euro/SGD options, and decentralized alternatives that can complement centralized choices. Circle+2Circle+2

How We Picked (Methodology & Scoring)

  • Liquidity (30%): Scale of circulation and exchange/DeFi depth for tight spreads and fast settlement.

  • Security (25%): Reserve quality, segregation, audits/attestations, onchain safety, and incident track record.

  • Coverage (15%): Multi-chain support, fiat rails, and breadth of supported currencies (USD, EUR, SGD).

  • Costs (15%): Primary mint/redeem fees, network costs, and known program fees.

  • UX (10%): Accessibility, APIs, documentation, and fiat on/off-ramps.

  • Support (5%): Enterprise support, disclosures, and transparency cadence.

We relied on official product/docs/security pages from each issuer and used market datasets (e.g., CCData/Kaiko/CoinGecko) for cross-checks only. Last updated September 2025. Circle+1

Top 10 stablecoin issuers and use cases in September 2025

1. Tether — Best for global, always-on liquidity

Why Use It: USD₮ (USDT) is the deepest liquidity pool across CEXs and many L2s—useful for traders and market makers who prioritize fills and routing. Tether publishes quarterly reserve attestations by BDO and a detailed reserves breakdown, improving transparency versus prior years. Tether+1
Best For: Active traders, OTC desks, market makers, emerging-market remittances.
Notable Features: Multi-chain footprint; public reserve updates; operational resilience at massive scale. Tether
Consider If: U.S. persons cannot use Tether’s own platform services under its Terms; rely on supported exchanges instead. Regions: Global (platform restrictions apply). Fees/Notes: Account verification and certain fees apply at the platform level. Tether+1
Alternatives: Circle (USDC), First Digital Labs (FDUSD).

2. Circle — USDC / EURC — Best for regulated, enterprise-grade rails

Why Use It: Circle emphasizes transparency, monthly reserve attestations, and segregation of funds. USDC is widely integrated with banks, fintechs, and onchain apps; EURC brings a euro option under the same standards. Circle+1
Best For: Enterprises/fintechs, payment flows, compliant treasuries, DeFi power users.
Notable Features: Circle Mint for programmatic mint/redeem; monthly attestations; multi-chain support; extensive docs. Fees/Notes: Institutional fee schedule applies for certain high-volume flows. Circle+1
Regions: Global (availability varies by partner/exchange).
Alternatives: Paxos (USDP), PayPal USD (PYUSD).

3. MakerDAO — DAI — Best decentralized, overcollateralized dollar

Why Use It: DAI is minted against overcollateralized crypto via the Maker Protocol, giving a censorship-resistant alternative to fiat-custodied coins. The Peg Stability Module (PSM) smooths peg fluctuations by allowing swaps with other stables. docs.makerdao.com+1
Best For: DeFi natives, long-term onchain treasuries, collateralized borrowing.
Notable Features: Onchain transparency; collateral diversity with governance controls; mature integrations across DeFi. docs.makerdao.com
Consider If: Exposure to crypto collateral and governance risk differs from fiat-backed models. Regions: Global.
Alternatives: Liquity (LUSD/BOLD), Frax (frxUSD).

4. First Digital Labs — FDUSD — Best for Asia-centric trading depth

Why Use It: FDUSD is fully reserved and designed for 1:1 redemption; it has become a deep-liquidity quote asset on major Asian venues. Issuance moved to a BVI entity (FD121 BVI) in 2025 to support global accessibility. firstdigitallabs.com+1
Best For: Traders on Asia-focused exchanges, cross-border settlement in APAC, OTC desks.
Notable Features: Monthly attestations; segregation of assets with qualified custodians; institutional onboarding. Fees/Notes: Primary mint/redeem requires becoming a client; retail typically uses secondary markets. firstdigitallabs.com+1
Regions: Global (institutional primary; retail via exchanges).
Alternatives: Tether (USDT), Circle (USDC).

5. Paxos — USDP — Best for NYDFS-regulated issuance

Why Use It: USDP is issued by Paxos Trust (NYDFS-regulated), held 100% in cash and cash equivalents, and redeemable 1:1. Paxos provides enterprise APIs and no-fee mint/redeem for primary customers. Paxos+1
Best For: Enterprises needing regulated counterparties, payment processors, fintechs.
Notable Features: Segregated, bankruptcy-remote client assets; Ethereum & Solana support; rich developer docs. Fees/Notes: No Paxos fee to mint/redeem USDP; bank/network fees may apply. Paxos+1
Regions: US/EU/APAC via partners; check onboarding eligibility.
Alternatives: Circle (USDC), PayPal USD (PYUSD).

6. PayPal USD (PYUSD) — Best for consumer payments in the U.S.

Why Use It: PYUSD brings stablecoins to familiar wallets (PayPal/Venmo), with instant P2P and merchant flows for eligible U.S. users. It’s issued by Paxos Trust and is redeemable within the PayPal ecosystem; PayPal has also launched an optional rewards program for eligible U.S. users. PayPal+1
Best For: U.S. consumers and SMBs using PayPal/Venmo, payment acceptance, loyalty.
Notable Features: Wallet-native UX; on/off-ramps; integrations expanding across networks. Fees/Notes: No fees to buy/sell/hold/transfer PYUSD inside eligible U.S. PayPal balances; conversion fees apply when swapping with other crypto. PayPal
Regions: U.S. only for consumer access via PayPal/Venmo.
Alternatives: USDC (for global reach), USDP (enterprise rails).

7. Ethena Labs — USDe — Best synthetic dollar for DeFi yields (advanced users)

Why Use It: USDe uses a delta-neutral mechanism (spot + perps/futures) to target dollar stability without relying solely on banks. sUSDe offers onchain, variable rewards sourced from the strategy. This is a crypto-native design and differs from fiat-redeemable models. docs.ethena.fi+1
Best For: Sophisticated DeFi users, L2 yield strategies, protocols integrating synthetic dollars.
Notable Features: Whitelist-based mint/redeem; peg supported by hedged positions; extensive docs. Fees/Notes: Not available to U.S. users; USDe is not redeemable for fiat by design. docs.ethena.fi+1
Regions: Global (restricted jurisdictions excluded).
Alternatives: DAI, frxUSD.

8. Frax Finance — frxUSD — Best modular stable for DeFi integrations

Why Use It: Frax introduced frxUSD, a fully collateralized, fiat-redeemable stablecoin with “enshrined custodians” while retaining Frax’s modular DeFi stack. It aims to couple institutional-grade backing with protocol-level tooling (lending/AMMs). Frax
Best For: DeFi builders, protocols needing composability, multi-product integration.
Notable Features: Hybrid custody model; Fraxtal/Frax ecosystem; onchain transparency dashboard. Fees/Notes: Details governed by Frax docs and custodial partners. Frax+1
Regions: Global (availability via exchanges/integrations).
Alternatives: USDC, DAI.

9. StraitsX — XSGD — Best for SGD settlements and APAC fintech rails

Why Use It: XSGD is a Singapore dollar stablecoin with monthly reserve attestations and a strong focus on compliant payments infrastructure across Southeast Asia. It’s widely integrated with regional wallets, OTC, and DeFi. straitsx.com+1
Best For: APAC businesses, cross-border SGD flows, FX pairs (XSGD↔USD stables).
Notable Features: Monthly attestations; issuer entities for SGD/USD; APIs for swaps/OTC. Fees/Notes: Platform and network fees apply; see issuer terms. straitsx.com
Regions: APAC (global transferability on supported chains).
Alternatives: USDC (USD rails), Monerium (EURe for EUR rails).

10. Monerium — EURe — Best for euro e-money compliance

Why Use It: Monerium issues EURe as regulated e-money under EU rules with segregated, over-collateralized assets—designed for compliant euro settlements onchain. Tokens live on Ethereum, Gnosis, and Polygon with instant redeemability. Monerium+1
Best For: European fintechs, treasuries needing euro rails, compliant B2B payments.
Notable Features: Authorized EMI; 102% safeguarding policy; e-money legal clarity; audited financials. Fees/Notes: Published fee schedule; standard banking/network fees may apply. Monerium+1
Regions: EU/EEA (global transferability on supported chains).
Alternatives: Circle (EURC), StraitsX (XSGD for SGD).

Decision Guide: Best By Use Case

  • Global trading liquidity: Tether (USDT). Tether

  • Regulated U.S./enterprise rails: Circle (USDC), Paxos (USDP). Circle+1

  • U.S. consumer payments/Loyalty: PayPal USD (PYUSD). PayPal

  • Decentralized/censorship-resistant: MakerDAO (DAI); Liquity (LUSD/BOLD) as alt. docs.makerdao.com+1

  • APAC settlement/SGD pairs: StraitsX (XSGD). straitsx.com

  • Euro compliance: Monerium (EURe), Circle (EURC). Monerium+1

  • DeFi-native synthetic dollar/yields: Ethena (USDe). docs.ethena.fi

  • Modular DeFi integration: Frax (frxUSD). Frax

How to Choose the Right stablecoin issuers (Checklist)

  • Region & eligibility: Are you a U.S. consumer, EU business, or global trader? (PayPal vs Circle/Paxos vs Tether/DeFi.) PayPal

  • Reserves & attestations: Look for frequent, third-party reports and clear segregation of client assets. Circle+1

  • Mechanism fit: Fiat-backed vs overcollateralized vs synthetic—match to risk tolerance. docs.makerdao.com+1

  • Chains & integrations: Ensure support for your target L2s, exchanges, and wallets.

  • Fees & slippage: Primary mint/redeem costs, network gas, conversion spreads. Paxos+1

  • Operational needs: APIs, treasury tools, reporting, and support SLAs.

  • Red flags: Vague reserve language, infrequent disclosures, or unclear redemption policies.

Use Token Metrics With Any stablecoin issuers

  • AI Ratings surface quality signals behind liquidity metrics.
  • Narrative Detection spots capital rotation into specific stablecoin ecosystems.

  • Portfolio Optimization helps size stablecoin sleeves by mandate (trading vs yield vs payments).

  • Alerts & Signals track peg deviations, volume spikes, and exchange outflows.
    Workflow: Research → Select → Execute with your chosen issuer/exchange → Monitor with alerts.


Primary CTA: Start free trial

Security & Compliance Tips

  • Enable 2FA and secure treasury ops (role-based access, hardware keys).

  • Confirm custody setup (segregated accounts; multi-sig or MPC for smart-contract risk).

  • Complete KYC/AML where required; verify permitted jurisdictions. Tether+1

  • Use RFQ/OTC for large conversions to reduce slippage.

  • Practice wallet hygiene: label treasury addresses, restrict permissions, and test redemptions.

This article is for research/education, not financial advice.

Beginner Mistakes to Avoid

  • Treating all stablecoins as identical; mechanisms and risks vary.

  • Ignoring fee schedules and settlement timelines for large redeems. Circle Help+1

  • Using a region-restricted product (e.g., PYUSD outside the U.S.; USDe app in restricted markets). PayPal+1

  • Overconcentrating in a single issuer or chain.

  • Skipping ongoing monitoring of peg, reserves, and disclosures.

FAQs

1) What are the main types of stablecoin issuers?
Three broad models: (1) Fiat-backed (Circle, Paxos, First Digital Labs), (2) Overcollateralized crypto-backed (MakerDAO DAI; Liquity), and (3) Synthetic/hedged (Ethena USDe). Each has distinct reserve/risk properties. docs.ethena.fi+3Circle+3Paxos+3

2) Which stablecoin is best for trading liquidity?
USDT typically leads on global CEX depth and pairs, with USDC often preferred for fiat-connected flows and DeFi. Choose based on venue support and treasury needs. Tether+1

3) Can U.S. users access every stablecoin?
No. PYUSD is for eligible U.S. PayPal/Venmo users; some protocols (e.g., Ethena) restrict U.S. access to their app. Always check terms. PayPal+1

4) How do fees work for minting and redeeming?
Paxos states no fees for mint/redeem USDP/PYUSD for primary clients; Circle has institutional schedules; Tether lists platform fees. Secondary-market trades still incur exchange/gas costs. Paxos+2Circle Help+2

5) Are euro or SGD stablecoins useful?
Yes. EURC/EURe enable euro settlements under EU rules; XSGD supports APAC rails and FX paths versus USD stables. Circle+2Monerium+2

6) Is DAI safer than fiat-backed coins?
“Safer” depends on your risk lens. DAI reduces bank/custodian reliance but adds crypto-collateral and governance risk; fiat-backed coins rely on custodians and regulators. Diversification is common. docs.makerdao.com

Conclusion + Related Reads

If you need global trading liquidity, start with USDT/USDC. For enterprise-grade compliance, Circle/Paxos shine. For decentralized resilience, DAI (and Liquity) fit. For regional rails, consider XSGD (APAC) and EURe/EURC (EU). Pair the right issuer with your use case, then monitor peg, reserves, and policy changes over time.

Related Reads:

  • Best Cryptocurrency Exchanges 2025

  • Top Derivatives Platforms 2025

  • Top Institutional Custody Providers 2025

‍

Research

Top On and Off-Ramp Providers (Fiat to Crypto) 2025

Sam Monac
5 min
MIN

Why Fiat ↔ Crypto On/Off-Ramps Matter in September 2025

Getting money into and out of crypto should be fast, safe, and compliant. In 2025, wallets, dapps, exchanges, and fintechs increasingly rely on crypto on/off-ramp providers to convert fiat to tokens and cash back out to bank rails—all without forcing users to bounce between apps. Definition: an on-ramp lets users buy crypto with fiat; an off-ramp lets them sell crypto back to fiat and withdraw to bank accounts or cards. This guide is for product leaders, devs, and advanced users comparing coverage, fees, and risk controls across global options. We score providers on liquidity, security, asset/market coverage, costs, UX, and support, then recommend the best fits by use case. Secondary angles we considered: fiat to crypto onramp, crypto off-ramp, and common flows like “buy crypto with bank transfer.”

How We Picked (Methodology & Scoring)

  • Liquidity (30%) – depth, uptime, and quote quality across assets/fiat rails.

  • Security (25%) – audits, certifications, KYC/AML controls, trust center disclosures.

  • Coverage (15%) – supported countries, payment methods, off-ramp payout rails.

  • Costs (15%) – transparent fees/spreads; promos (e.g., USDC zero-fee tiers).

  • UX (10%) – speed (KYC/settlement), embeddable widgets, developer docs.

  • Support (5%) – docs, SLAs, live support, incident comms.

Data sources: official product/docs and security pages; licensing and disclosures; limited cross-checks with widely cited market datasets. We only link to official provider sites in this article. Last updated September 2025.

Top 10 Fiat ↔ Crypto On/Off-Ramp Providers in September 2025

1. Coinbase Onramp & Offramp — Best for USDC flows & regulated U.S./EU coverage

  • Why Use It: Coinbase’s hosted Onramp and Offramp APIs let you embed buy/sell with bank rails and cards, including ACH cashouts, inside your app. Select apps can access zero-fee USDC onramp/offramp promotions and free USDC on Base. Coinbase+2Coinbase+2

  • Best For: U.S./EU wallets & dapps, consumer fintechs, apps prioritizing compliance.

  • Notable Features: hosted widgets; guest checkout for US (no account up to limits); ACH cashout; strong docs & SDKs. Coinbase Developer Docs

  • Fees Notes: Standard fees vary by method; USDC promos may apply. Coinbase

  • Regions: Global reach with strongest support in U.S./EU; method availability varies. Coinbase Developer Docs

  • Consider If: You need a turnkey, regulated option with ACH off-ramp.

  • Alternatives: MoonPay, Ramp Network.

2. MoonPay — Best for non-custodial UX & card coverage

  • Why Use It: MoonPay offers fast card/Apple Pay/PayPal buys and a non-custodial off-ramp, letting users sell crypto while keeping control of keys. Good fit for wallets and NFT apps that want an embedded flow. MoonPay+1

  • Best For: Self-custody wallets, NFT marketplaces, global card-first audiences.

  • Notable Features: Onramp + off-ramp; non-custodial design; quick card settlement. MoonPay+1

  • Fees Notes: Varies by payment method and region.

  • Regions: Broad international availability; local method support varies.

  • Consider If: You want non-custodial off-ramp with strong card acceptance.

  • Alternatives: Transak, Banxa.

3. Ramp Network — Best for global coverage + fast KYC

  • Why Use It: Ramp supports 100+ assets and multiple local rails (cards, bank transfers, Pix, SPEI) with fast, document-free KYC in eligible markets and SOC/ISO certifications published via its Trust Center. rampnetwork.com+2ramp.network+2

  • Best For: Wallets/dapps needing wide country coverage and quick onboarding.

  • Notable Features: On & off-ramp; 100+ assets; local rails incl. Pix & SPEI payouts; strong security disclosures. ramp.network+1

  • Fees Notes: Vary by method, asset, and geography.

  • Regions: 150+ countries; some U.S. states support on-ramp only (no off-ramp). support.rampnetwork.com

  • Consider If: You want breadth plus local rails in LATAM/EU.

  • Alternatives: Transak, Alchemy Pay.

4. Transak — Best for developer tooling & hybrid use cases

  • Why Use It: Transak offers on/off-ramp coverage (40+ off-ramp assets across 20+ networks) with over 64+ supported countries and Transak One to let users fund complex actions (e.g., stake/bridge) from fiat in one flow. Transak Docs+2Transak+2

  • Best For: Developers needing a broad, configurable integration; DeFi apps.

  • Notable Features: Off-ramp to bank; multi-network coverage; business (corporate) on/off-ramp; embeddable widgets. Transak+1

  • Fees Notes: Vary by method; see widget quotes.

  • Regions: 60+ countries; payment methods differ by market. Transak

  • Consider If: You need both retail and corporate on/off-ramp options.

  • Alternatives: Ramp Network, Banxa.

5. Banxa — Best for compliance-heavy enterprise & deep licensing

  • Why Use It: Banxa emphasizes regulated operations with published USA MTL and global license lists, plus enterprise-grade AML/CTF and security disclosures. Strong for partners who need extensive compliance artifacts. Banxa+2Banxa+2

  • Best For: Enterprises, wallets, and exchanges with strict compliance needs.

  • Notable Features: On/off-ramp via API/widget; broad fiat/crypto support; license/AML pages; developer SDKs. Banxa+1

  • Fees Notes: Pricing varies; transparent info pages provided. Banxa

  • Regions: Global (entity-specific); U.S. coverage via MTL entity; details in license PDFs. Banxa

  • Consider If: Your risk/compliance teams require detailed attestations.

  • Alternatives: Zero Hash, Transak.

6. Alchemy Pay — Best for emerging markets & alternative wallets

  • Why Use It: Alchemy Pay bridges fiat and crypto with on/off-ramp across 50+ countries (and expanding), focusing on emerging markets and a wide range of local wallets/payments. It’s actively growing U.S. coverage via new MTLs (e.g., Arizona, South Carolina). docs+2alchemypay.org+2

  • Best For: Dapps targeting emerging markets; global apps needing local wallets.

  • Notable Features: On/off-ramp; Apple/Google Pay & regional wallets; developer docs; business flows. alchemypay.org

  • Fees Notes: Competitive, vary by payment rail.

  • Regions: Global (check country list); growing U.S. state coverage via MTLs. alchemypay.org

  • Consider If: You prioritize local payment methods in APAC/LATAM.

  • Alternatives: Transak, Ramp Network.

7. Kraken — Best regulated exchange on/off-ramp (U.S./EU)

  • Why Use It: Kraken provides fiat funding and withdrawals in USD/EUR/CAD with ACH, SEPA, and card rails, offering a straightforward path to buy/sell and cash out to bank. Useful if you want exchange liquidity plus strong support docs. Kraken+1

  • Best For: Traders and users who prefer exchange-native fiat rails.

  • Notable Features: ACH deposits (no fee for many U.S. clients), cash withdrawals, app guides. Kraken+2Kraken Support+2

  • Fees Notes: Funding/withdrawal fees and holds depend on method (e.g., ACH hold windows). Kraken Support

  • Regions: U.S./EU/Canada; ACH account linking not available in NY, WA, TX. Kraken

  • Consider If: You want deep orderbook liquidity alongside fiat rails.

  • Alternatives: Bitstamp, Coinbase.

8. Bitstamp — Best for EU banking rails & stable UX

  • Why Use It: One of the longest-running exchanges, Bitstamp supports bank deposits (SEPA/International, ACH) and card purchases, plus fiat withdrawals to bank accounts. Simple, well-documented flows are ideal for EU and U.S. users wanting a clean on/off-ramp. Bitstamp+2Bitstamp+2

  • Best For: EU users; U.S. users comfortable with exchange-based cashouts.

  • Notable Features: ACH deposits/withdrawals, SEPA (incl. Instant SEPA), card & Apple/Google Pay availability. Bitstamp+2Bitstamp+2

  • Fees Notes: See Bitstamp fee schedule; varies by method. Bitstamp

  • Regions: EU/UK/US (availability by method).

  • Consider If: You want familiar exchange UX with established bank rails.

  • Alternatives: Kraken, Coinbase.

9. Stripe Crypto Onramp — Best embeddable onramp for U.S./EU apps

  • Why Use It: Stripe’s fiat-to-crypto onramp is a customizable widget/hosted flow you can embed in wallets, NFT apps, and dapps—Stripe handles KYC, fraud, and payments. Ideal for teams already on Stripe. Note: onramp availability is U.S. (excl. Hawaii) + EU. Stripe Docs+2Stripe Docs+2

  • Best For: U.S./EU dapps and platforms standardizing on Stripe.

  • Notable Features: Embedded or hosted onramp; identity & fraud tooling; stablecoin payout stack. Stripe Docs

  • Fees Notes: Stripe pricing applies; quotes shown in onramp UI.

  • Regions: U.S. (minus HI) and EU currently. Stripe Docs

  • Consider If: You need a polished onramp (no off-ramp) with Stripe stack.

  • Alternatives: Coinbase Onramp, MoonPay.

10. Zero Hash — Best turnkey B2B infrastructure (regulated build-out)

  • Why Use It: Zero Hash powers on/off-ramp for enterprises, abstracting licensing and regulatory complexity. B2B partners can convert between fiat and 60+ crypto assets, with quote controls and payout rails. zerohash.com+1

  • Best For: Fintechs, banks, and platforms embedding compliant crypto.

  • Notable Features: API-first; short path to market; configurable quotes; bank payouts. docs.zerohash.com

  • Fees Notes: Enterprise pricing; volume-based.

  • Regions: Coverage varies by solution and jurisdiction.

  • Consider If: You need compliance + infra rather than a retail widget.

  • Alternatives: Banxa, Coinbase (developer).

Decision Guide: Best By Use Case

How to Choose the Right Fiat ↔ Crypto On/Off-Ramp (Checklist)

  • Confirm region & method eligibility (ACH/SEPA/cards; off-ramp availability by country/state).

  • Check asset/fiat coverage for your top flows (BTC, ETH, stablecoins, local fiat).

  • Review security posture (SOC/ISO, trust center, KYC/AML, sanctions screening). Ramp

  • Compare fees & spreads (and promos like zero-fee USDC) and settlement speeds. Coinbase

  • Validate developer experience (docs, hosted vs. embedded, SDKs). Coinbase

  • Ensure support & SLAs meet your needs (status pages, incident comms).

  • Red flags: unclear licensing, no security disclosures, or “global” claims without a country/method matrix.

Use Token Metrics With Any On/Off-Ramp

  • AI Ratings: Screen top assets before you convert.
  • Narrative Detection: Spot sector momentum early.

  • Portfolio Optimization: Size positions to risk.

  • Alerts/Signals: Get entries/exits without screen-watching.
    Workflow: Research → Select ramp → Execute buy/sell → Monitor with alerts.


Primary CTA: Start free trial 

Security & Compliance Tips

  • Enable 2FA and use strong unique passwords.

  • Separate custody (self-custody vs. exchange) from ramp accounts as needed.

  • Follow KYC/AML requirements; prepare source-of-funds docs for higher limits.

  • For OTC/RFQ flows, lock quotes and confirm fees before sending. docs.zerohash.com

  • Maintain wallet hygiene: test transfers, verify addresses, track gas/fees.

This article is for research/education, not financial advice.

Beginner Mistakes to Avoid

  • Assuming a provider supports both on- and off-ramp in your country (often not true). support.rampnetwork.com

  • Ignoring ACH hold windows or payout timings when planning cashouts. Kraken Support

  • Overlooking fees/spreads vs. headline “no fee” promos. Coinbase

  • Embedding an onramp without sandbox/testing error states.

  • Not checking licensing & security disclosures before integration. Banxa+1

FAQs

What is a crypto on-ramp vs. off-ramp?
An on-ramp lets users buy crypto with fiat (e.g., card, bank transfer). An off-ramp lets users sell crypto for fiat and withdraw to bank rails or cards. Coinbase

Which providers are best for U.S. ACH cashouts?
Coinbase Offramp and Kraken both support ACH, with method availability depending on state and account status. Coinbase Developer Docs+1

Does Stripe support off-ramp?
Stripe currently offers a fiat-to-crypto onramp (no off-ramp). It’s available in the U.S. (excluding Hawaii) and EU. Stripe Docs

Which options are strongest outside the U.S.?
For broad coverage and local rails, consider Ramp Network (Pix/SPEI), Transak (multi-network off-ramp), and Alchemy Pay (regional wallets). ramp.network+2Transak Docs+2

What about enterprise-grade compliance?
Banxa and Zero Hash publish license/compliance docs and are built for B2B integrations with higher assurance requirements. Banxa+1

Conclusion + Related Reads

The best choice depends on your region, payout rails, and risk posture. If you want a regulated U.S. ACH flow with strong docs, start with Coinbase. Need global coverage and local methods? Ramp, Transak, and Alchemy Pay shine. For enterprise and bank-grade requirements, Banxa and Zero Hash are strong bets. Exchange-based ramps via Kraken or Bitstamp work well if you also need deep liquidity.

Related Reads:

  • Best Cryptocurrency Exchanges 2025

  • Top Derivatives Platforms 2025

  • Top Institutional Custody Providers 2025

‍

Research

Best Crypto Payment Processors for Merchants (2025)

Sam Monac
5 min
MIN

Why crypto payment processors for merchants Matter in September 2025

If you sell online (or in-store) and want to accept Bitcoin or stablecoins, choosing the best crypto payment processors can lower costs, expand global reach, and reduce chargeback risk. In one line: a crypto payment processor lets merchants accept digital assets at checkout and settle in crypto or fiat while handling pricing, invoicing, and compliance basics.
In 2025, stablecoin rails and Lightning are improving speed and costs, while major gateways add plugins for Shopify, WooCommerce, and custom APIs. This guide is for startups and enterprises comparing fees, settlement options, asset coverage, and regional availability. We blend live docs research with practical fit notes so you can pick confidently and ship faster.

How We Picked (Methodology & Scoring)

  • Liquidity (30%): breadth of supported assets/rails (BTC, stablecoins, Lightning), reliability of conversion/settlement.

  • Security (25%): custody model, key management options, certifications, and clear incident/disclosure pages.

  • Coverage (15%): e-commerce plugins, API maturity, payouts, and fiat-settlement choices.

  • Costs (15%): transparent processing fees, conversion/payout costs.

  • UX (10%): checkout speed, invoicing, reporting, and developer experience.

  • Support (5%): docs quality, SLA, enterprise support.
    Data sources: official product/docs, pricing/security pages, and (for cross-checks only) widely cited market datasets. Last updated September 2025.

Top 10 crypto payment processors for merchants in September 2025

1. BitPay — Best for mature U.S. merchants wanting stable operations

  • Why Use It: One of the longest-running crypto processors with robust invoicing, refunds, accounting exports, and fiat settlement. Tiered pricing and clear policies suit compliance-sensitive teams. BitPay+1

  • Best For: U.S./EU retailers, subscriptions, digital goods, B2B invoices.

  • Notable Features: Branded checkout links; partial/full refunds; mass payouts; settlement in multiple currencies; stablecoin support. support.bitpay.com

  • Consider If: You want predictable fees and traditional support over maximum coin variety.

  • Fees/Regions: Tiered 1–2% + $0.25 per transaction; extensive global reach. BitPay

  • Alternatives: Coinbase Commerce, CoinGate.

2. Coinbase Commerce — Best for simple USDC/crypto checkout with fiat-style reporting

  • Why Use It: Clean merchant dashboard, simple payment links, and an onchain payment protocol with automatic conversions; integrates neatly with Coinbase ecosystem and USDC flows. Coinbase

  • Best For: SaaS, creators, and startups already using Coinbase.

  • Notable Features: Payment links; ecommerce plugins; onchain protocol migration; automatic fee display and reporting. Coinbase Help

  • Consider If: You want a recognizable brand and 1% flat pricing.

  • Fees/Regions: 1% processing fee; broad availability (jurisdictional limits may apply). Coinbase Help

  • Alternatives: BitPay, Crypto.com Pay.

3. CoinGate — Best for multi-coin coverage and EU-friendly payouts

  • Why Use It: Transparent pricing and solid plugin coverage (WooCommerce, OpenCart, etc.) with weekly settlements and crypto payouts. Best Bitcoin & Crypto Payment Processor

  • Best For: EU merchants, hosting/VPNs, and globally distributed ecommerce.

  • Notable Features: 1% processing; refunds in crypto; payouts with/without conversion; accepts customers from 180+ countries. Best Bitcoin & Crypto Payment Processor

  • Consider If: You need flexible payouts and many altcoins.

  • Fees/Regions: 1% processing; additional small fees for certain payout types; EU/Global. Best Bitcoin & Crypto Payment Processor

  • Alternatives: CoinPayments, NOWPayments.

4. CoinPayments — Best for plugins and long-tail altcoin acceptance

  • Why Use It: A veteran gateway with broad coin support and deep ecommerce integrations (BigCommerce, WooCommerce). Good for merchants courting crypto-native audiences. CoinPayments

  • Best For: Online stores, marketplaces, gaming.

  • Notable Features: Auto-conversion between coins; extensive plugin library; merchant tools and invoicing. BigCommerce

  • Consider If: You want low, flat pricing across many assets.

  • Fees/Regions: 0.5% processing (plus network fees); Global. CoinPayments

  • Alternatives: CoinGate, NOWPayments.

5. NOWPayments — Best for lowest advertised base rate with auto-conversion

  • Why Use It: Simple setup, broad coin list, and clear fee tiers—great for testing crypto checkout with minimal overhead. NOWPayments

  • Best For: SMB ecommerce, content creators, charities.

  • Notable Features: 300+ coins; donations/PoS widgets; subscriptions; mass payouts; auto-conversion. NOWPayments

  • Consider If: You value quick launch and wide asset coverage.

  • Fees/Regions: 0.5% monocurrency; 1% with conversion (excl. network fees); Global. NOWPayments

  • Alternatives: CoinPayments, CoinGate.

6. OpenNode — Best for Bitcoin + Lightning with fiat conversion

  • Why Use It: Lightning-native processing for low fees and instant settlement, with optional auto-conversion to local currency to avoid BTC volatility. OpenNode

  • Best For: High-volume BTC checkouts, gaming, and emerging markets needing fast micro-payments.

  • Notable Features: Hosted checkout; API; automatic conversion; bank settlements; PoS. OpenNode

  • Consider If: You prioritize Lightning speed and simple, transparent pricing.

  • Fees/Regions: 1% transaction fee; supports many currencies and countries; Global. OpenNode

  • Alternatives: Lightspark, BTCPay Server (self-hosted).

7. Lightspark — Best enterprise Lightning infrastructure

  • Why Use It: Enterprise-grade Lightning with AI-assisted routing, flexible custody models, and SLA-style support—ideal for platforms embedding realtime payments. Lightspark

  • Best For: Fintechs, exchanges, marketplaces, and PSPs embedding Bitcoin/Lightning.

  • Notable Features: Managed nodes; Predict routing; UMA support; role-based access; audit-ready reporting. Lightspark

  • Consider If: You need predictable Lightning performance at scale.

  • Fees/Regions: Starter 0.50%; Enterprise 0.30–0.15% with volume tiers; Global. Lightspark

  • Alternatives: OpenNode, Coinbase Commerce (non-Lightning).

8. Crypto.com Pay — Best for ecosystem reach and co-marketing

  • Why Use It: Merchant app + plugins, catalog placement, and cash settlement with zero crypto price risk claims; strong brand for consumer trust. Crypto.com

  • Best For: Retail, entertainment, and brands wanting exposure to Crypto.com’s user base.

  • Notable Features: API & plugins (Shopify/WooCommerce); recurring for app users; in-store app acceptance; security certifications displayed. Crypto.com

  • Consider If: You want marketing reach alongside payments.

  • Fees/Regions: Availability and settlement options vary by jurisdiction; “300M+ USD processed per annum” marketing stat on site. Crypto.com

  • Alternatives: Coinbase Commerce, BitPay.

9. TripleA — Best for compliance-first global merchants (MAS-licensed)

  • Why Use It: Singapore-based gateway emphasizing licensing and compliance (MAS Major Payment Institution), with global acceptance and fiat settlement. eServices

  • Best For: Regulated industries, cross-border ecommerce, APAC reach.

  • Notable Features: Merchant APIs; ecommerce plugins; settlement to bank accounts; multi-asset support. Triple-A – Triple-A

  • Consider If: Licensing and audits matter more than long-tail altcoins.

  • Fees/Regions: Pricing by quote; Licensed in Singapore; Global coverage. eServices

  • Alternatives: BitPay, CoinGate.

10. Alchemy Pay — Best hybrid fiat-crypto acceptance with wide country reach

  • Why Use It: Hybrid rails (on/off-ramp + crypto payments) covering 173 countries, with fiat settlement and SDKs for web/app flows; active U.S. licensing expansion. Alchemy Pay+2Alchemy Pay+2

  • Best For: Global ecommerce, super-apps, and platforms needing both purchase and checkout rails.

  • Notable Features: Checkout SDK; QR/wallet payments; off-ramp payouts; partner integrations. docs

  • Consider If: You want one vendor for ramps + crypto acceptance.

  • Fees/Regions: Pricing via sales; jurisdictional variability noted; Global/APAC focus with growing U.S. coverage. xinwen.alchemypay.org+1

  • Alternatives: Crypto.com Pay, Coinbase Commerce.

Decision Guide: Best By Use Case

How to Choose the Right crypto payment processors for merchants (Checklist)

  • Confirm regional eligibility and licensing (e.g., U.S., EU, APAC).

  • Compare processing + conversion + payout fees (not just headline rates).

  • Decide on settlement (crypto vs. fiat) and supported currencies.

  • Check plugin coverage (Shopify, WooCommerce) and API maturity.

  • Review security posture (custody model, certifications, disclosures).

  • Validate support/SLA and refund workflows.

  • Red flags: vague fees, no docs/status page, or unclear settlement policies.

Use Token Metrics With Any crypto payment processors for merchants

  • AI Ratings: screen coins and chains your customers actually use.
  • Narrative Detection: spot momentum (e.g., stablecoin or Lightning surges).

  • Portfolio Optimization: model treasury exposure if you keep a crypto balance.

  • Alerts & Signals: monitor market moves that affect checkout conversions.
    Workflow: Research in TM → Pick a processor → Go live → Monitor with alerts.

Primary CTA: Start free trial

Security & Compliance Tips

  • Enable 2FA and role-based access on the merchant dashboard.

  • Choose custody/settlement that fits your risk (self-custody vs. managed, fiat vs. crypto).

  • Follow KYC/AML and tax rules in each operating region.

  • For RFQ/OTC conversions, document rates/partners.

  • Keep wallet hygiene (whitelists, limited hot-wallet balances).

This article is for research/education, not financial advice.

Beginner Mistakes to Avoid

  • Chasing the lowest “headline rate” while ignoring conversion/payout fees.

  • Forgetting to test refunds, partial payments, and expired invoices.

  • Launching without clear settlement currency and payout timing.

  • Relying on a single chain/asset when your audience uses others.

  • Ignoring jurisdictional limitations and licensing disclosures.

FAQs

What is a crypto payment processor for merchants?
A service that lets businesses accept digital assets (e.g., BTC, USDC) and settle in crypto or fiat while handling pricing, invoicing, and basic compliance/reporting.

Are crypto fees lower than card fees?
Often yes—many gateways list ~0.5–1% base rates, though network and conversion/payout fees can apply. Compare total effective cost per order. Best Bitcoin & Crypto Payment Processor+2CoinPayments+2

Can I receive USD/EUR instead of crypto?
Most processors offer instant conversion and fiat settlement to bank accounts in supported regions. Check your vendor’s settlement currencies and schedules. OpenNode+1

Which is best for Lightning or micro-payments?
OpenNode and Lightspark are built around Lightning for instant, low-cost payments, with enterprise options and APIs. OpenNode+1

Is self-hosting a gateway possible?
Yes—projects like BTCPay Server exist for technical teams, but managed gateways reduce operational burden and add fiat settlement options.

Conclusion + Related Reads

Merchants should match checkout rails to customer demand: go BitPay/Coinbase Commerce for simplicity and brand trust, CoinGate/CoinPayments/NOWPayments for broad asset coverage, OpenNode/Lightspark for Lightning speed, and Alchemy Pay/Crypto.com Pay for hybrid rails and reach. Test fees and settlement with a pilot, then scale.

Related Reads:

  • Best Cryptocurrency Exchanges 2025

  • Top Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) by Liquidity & UX (2025)

  • Top Institutional Custody Providers 2025

‍

Choose from Platinum, Gold, and Silver packages
Reach with 25–30% open rates and 0.5–1% CTR
Craft your own custom ad—from banners to tailored copy
Perfect for Crypto Exchanges, SaaS Tools, DeFi, and AI Products