Back to blog
Crypto Basics

Top Upcoming Crypto Coins - 14 High Potential Altcoins Not Trading Yet

Check 14 high potential upcoming crypto altcoins that are not trading yet. Stay ahead in the cryptocurrency market with these upcoming coins in 2024.
Token Metrics Team
11 Minutes
Want Smarter Crypto Picks—Free?
See unbiased Token Metrics Ratings for BTC, ETH, and top alts.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
 No credit card | 1-click unsubscribe

Click here to buy Cryptocurrencies from Gate.io

Welcome to this comprehensive guide on upcoming crypto coins that have not yet started trading. In this article, we will explore 14 high-potential altcoins carefully selected by Ian Balina, the founder and CEO of Token Metrics. Ian has an impressive track record in the crypto space and has invested in numerous successful projects.

With a background in computer engineering and experience working at top tech companies, Ian brings a wealth of knowledge and insights to the table. His past investments include projects like Gameswift and Pixels, which have delivered significant returns for investors.

Why Listen to Token Metrics?

Token Metrics is a reputable platform that provides in-depth research and analysis of various blockchain projects. The team at Token Metrics has invested in over 30 different projects, carefully selecting those with the potential to provide substantial returns. 

Their research has consistently delivered alpha in the form of hidden gems and early-stage investments.

Selection Criteria

The 14 projects featured in this article have been carefully chosen based on specific criteria. These criteria include a high tech score of 75% or above, strong fundamentals, long-term staying power, and the potential to enter the top 100 market cap. 

It's important to note that investing in early-stage projects carries inherent risks, and individuals should conduct their own research and exercise caution.

How to Manage Risk?

Managing risk is crucial when investing in cryptocurrencies. One key strategy is to diversify your portfolio and not invest more than 5% of your total portfolio into any single project. 

Token Metrics Ventures, for example, only allocates a maximum of 1% of its portfolio to early-stage projects. This ensures that the overall impact on the portfolio is minimized even if a project fails.

It's also important to stay updated on the latest market trends, news, and developments within the crypto industry. Also, setting realistic expectations and understanding that investing in early-stage projects carries both high potential rewards and high risks is essential. 

Conducting thorough research and analyzing the team, technology, and market conditions can somewhat mitigate risks.

List of 14 Upcoming Altcoins Not Trading Yet

Now, let's delve into the 14 high-potential altcoins that have not yet started trading.

1. Gravity (GRVT)

Gravity, also known as GRVT, is a next-generation hybrid ZK Sync crypto exchange that aims to bring together decentralized finance (DeFi) and centralized finance (C-Fi). It offers self-custody with low fees, making it easy for users to trade. Gravity's key narratives include ZK Sync, DeFi, and DEXes.

One of the reasons why Token Metrics is excited about Gravity is its backing by a strong list of market makers, including QCP, Susquehanna Group, and Dolphy Digital. These institutional backers provide credibility and support to the project. 

The vibe of Gravity is reminiscent of GMX from the previous cycle, which saw significant success. There is a confirmed airdrop for Gravity, making it an attractive option for potential investors.

2. Nillion

Nillion is a highly technical project that aims to build a blind computer for decentralized trust. It focuses on sharing secure data storage and privacy for AI, Deepin, and IoT applications. With a tech score of 77%, Nillion is a project that stands out due to its technical capabilities.

The key narrative for Nillion revolves around computing, privacy, AI, and Deepin. It competes with projects like Chainlink, Render, Ocean, and Marlin. Nillion's team comprises experienced professionals from major tech companies like Google, Facebook, Apple, and Uber. This expertise contributes to the project's strong technical foundation. 

The vibes of Nillion are similar to those of Chainlink, a project that has proven its long-term staying power. Nillion's probable airdrop makes it an intriguing option for investors looking to capitalize on its potential.

3. My Pet Hooligan

My Pet Hooligan is an exciting gaming project that allows users to adopt and train digital pets in an interactive world. Players can engage in various activities, including fighting and gaming. With a fundamental score of 77%, My Pet Hooligan has received positive feedback and has already generated over $60 million in NFT sales.

The gaming industry has experienced significant growth in recent years, and My Pet Hooligan aims to tap into this market. The project's confirmed airdrop and play-to-earn game mechanics make it an attractive opportunity for investors. 

The vibes of My Pet Hooligan are reminiscent of Axie Infinity, a project that has seen tremendous success and has become a major player in the gaming sector.

Click here to buy Cryptocurrencies from Gate.io

4. Parcl

Parcl is a unique project that aims to create a platform for trading real estate market values using city indexes. It effectively creates a derivatives market for real estate indices, allowing users to go long or short on different markets without directly owning the physical assets. With a fundamental score of 77%, Parcl stands out as a project with long-term staying power.

One of the reasons why Token Metrics is bullish on Parcl is its ability to survive bear markets. Similar to how Synthetix performed well during a bear market, Parcl provides an on-ramp for investors to trade real estate markets. 

The vibes of Parcl are reminiscent of Helium Network, a project that has demonstrated long-term growth and resilience. There is a confirmed airdrop for Parcl, making it an intriguing opportunity for investors.

5. Nibiru

Nibiru is a proof-of-stake blockchain that powers decentralized applications (dApps). It focuses on DeFi, and real-world assets and acts as a layer-one solution for the Cosmos ecosystem. With a tech score of 81%, Nibiru competes with projects like Solana, Sey, Injective, Neutron, and Archway.

Token Metrics is excited about Nibiru due to its competitive advantages over similar projects. For instance, Nibiru has a higher tech score than Neutron, a project with a current valuation of $1.5 billion. This suggests that Nibiru can potentially achieve a higher valuation in the future. 

The vibes of Nibiru are reminiscent of Injective, a successful project that focuses on being an L1 for DeFi. Nibiru has a confirmed airdrop, adding to its appeal to potential investors.

6. ReadyGG

Ready or ReadyGG is a Web3 gaming ecosystem that aims to onboard Web2 games into the Web3 world. The project provides tools and an SDK for game developers to add Web3 components to their games. With a tech score of 81%, Ready or ReadyGG competes with projects like Gainswift and Immutable X.

One of the reasons why Token Metrics is bullish on Ready or ReadyGG is its strong business development team and rapid onboarding of gaming studios. 

The project's vibes are reminiscent of Immutable X, a successful project focusing on bringing scalability to the gaming industry. Ready or ReadyGG has a probable airdrop, making it an attractive option for investors looking to capitalize on the future growth of the gaming sector.

7. Dolomite

Dolomite is a unique project that combines the strengths of a decentralized exchange (DEX) and a lending protocol. Built on Arbitrum, a layer two solution, Dolomite aims to provide a capital-efficient modular protocol for users. With a tech score of 85%, Dolomite competes with projects like DYDX, Synthetix, and GMX.

Token Metrics is excited about Dolomite due to its capital efficiency and ability to provide both DEX and lending functionalities. The project is backed by Coinbase Ventures, providing additional credibility and support. 

The vibes of Dolomite are reminiscent of DYDX, a successful project that focuses on being an L1 for DeFi. Dolomite has a confirmed airdrop, making it an intriguing option for potential investors.

8. Movement Labs

Movement Labs is a project that aims to build a modular blockchain network for the Move language. By making Move available on other layer two solutions like Ethereum and Avalanche, Movement Labs enables developers to code and run Move applications on various blockchains. With a tech score of 85%, Movement Labs competes with projects like Eclipse and Ethereum's rollup solutions.

Token Metrics is bullish on Movement Labs due to its potential to become a move-based ZK layer two on Ethereum. The project's vibes are reminiscent of Stacks, a successful L2 project on Bitcoin. Movement Labs has a confirmed airdrop, making it an attractive opportunity for investors looking to capitalize on the future of blockchain development.

9. Ola

Ola is a ZK virtual machine that enables secure private computations using zero-knowledge knowledge proofs. By bringing secure and private computations to the blockchain, Ola aims to provide users with enhanced privacy and security. With a tech score of 87%, Ola competes with projects like Elio, Aztec, and Ten (formerly known as Obscuro).

Token Metrics is excited about Ola due to its strong team, which includes former members of the Qtum project. The team's experience and expertise contribute to Ola's technical foundation. 

The vibes of Ola are reminiscent of Phantom, a successful project focusing on GPU computing for AI. Ola has a probable airdrop, making it an intriguing option for potential investors.

10. Lurk

Lurk is a highly technical project that aims to build a ZK compute platform with a specialized language for developing private applications that are formally verifiable. With a tech score of 87%, Lurk competes with projects like Cardano, Risk Zero, and PeliHedra.

Token Metrics is bullish on Lurk due to its ability to formally verify ZK proofs, similar to Cardano's approach to formal verification. 

The vibes of Lurk are reminiscent of Cardano, a project known for its focus on formal verification and strong team. Lurk has a probable airdrop, making it an attractive opportunity for investors looking to capitalize on the potential of formal verification in blockchain applications.

11. Nimble

Nimble is an exciting AI project that aims to democratize AI by allowing decentralized composable AI models and data for developers. With a tech score of 87%, Nimble competes with projects like BitTensor and Fetch.

Token Metrics is excited about Nimble due to its strong team, which includes engineers from major tech companies like Google, Facebook, Apple, and Uber. The team's expertise in machine learning and AI adds credibility to the project. 

The vibes of Nimble are reminiscent of Render Network, a successful AI project focusing on GPU computing. Nimble has a probable airdrop, making it an intriguing option for investors looking to capitalize on the future of AI.

12. Ten

Ten, formerly known as Obscuro, is a layer two roll-up solution that focuses on encrypting Ethereum transactions. With a tech score of 89%, Ten competes with projects like Aztec, Alio, Ola, Secret Network, and Railgun.

Token Metrics is bullish on Ten due to its strong team, which includes professionals from R3 and Koda. This enterprise blockchain background adds credibility to the project. 

The vibes of Ten are reminiscent of Algorand, a successful project known for its focus on enterprise adoption. Ten has a confirmed airdrop and plans to launch in Q2, making it an attractive opportunity for potential investors.

13. Dojima Network

Dojima Network aims to build an Omni-Chain Layer 1 platform for various applications like Web3, DeFi, NFTs, and gaming. With a tech score of 89%, Dojima Network competes with projects like ZetaChain, Pokedat, and Cosmos.

Token Metrics is excited about Dojima Network due to its under-the-radar potential. The project is still relatively unknown, allowing investors to get in early. 

The vibes of Dojima Network are reminiscent of Polygon, a project that started small but has grown into a major player in the blockchain space. Dojima Network has confirmed airdrop makes it an intriguing option for potential investors.

14. Peaq Network

Peaq Network is an L1 blockchain platform for real-world applications, particularly Deepin. With a tech score of 89%, Peaq Network competes with projects like Solana and IoTeX.

Token Metrics is bullish on Peaq Network due to its booming ecosystem and strong support from companies like Tesla, Sony, Bosch, and Jaguar. The project aims to provide a comprehensive solution for developers building Deepin applications. 

The vibes of Peaq Network are reminiscent of Solana, a successful project that has achieved significant market cap growth. Peaq Network has a confirmed airdrop, making it an attractive opportunity for potential investors.

Conclusion

In this article, we have explored 14 high-potential altcoins that have not yet started trading. These projects have been carefully selected based on their tech scores, fundamentals, long-term staying power, and potential to enter the top 100 market cap. 

However, conducting thorough research and exercising caution before making investment decisions is crucial. Investing in cryptocurrencies carries risks, and it is important to consult with professionals and make informed choices.

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other advice, and you should not treat any of the website's content as such.

Token Metrics does not recommend buying, selling, or holding any cryptocurrency. Conduct your due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Click here to buy Cryptocurrencies from Gate.io

Build Smarter Crypto Apps &
AI Agents in Minutes, Not Months
Real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API.
Grab a Free API Key
About Token Metrics
Token Metrics: AI-powered crypto research and ratings platform. We help investors make smarter decisions with unbiased Token Metrics Ratings, on-chain analytics, and editor-curated “Top 10” guides. Our platform distills thousands of data points into clear scores, trends, and alerts you can act on.
30 Employees
analysts, data scientists, and crypto engineers
Daily Briefings
concise market insights and “Top Picks”
Transparent & Compliant
Sponsored ≠ Ratings; research remains independent
Want Smarter Crypto Picks—Free?
See unbiased Token Metrics Ratings for BTC, ETH, and top alts.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
 No credit card | 1-click unsubscribe
Token Metrics Team
Token Metrics Team

Recent Posts

Research

API Endpoint Essentials: Design, Security & Tips

Token Metrics Team
5

APIs power modern software by exposing discrete access points called endpoints. Whether you re integrating a third-party data feed, building a microservice architecture, or wiring a WebSocket stream, understanding what an api endpoint is and how to design, secure, and monitor one is essential for robust systems.

What is an API endpoint and how it works

An api endpoint is a network-accessible URL or address that accepts requests and returns responses according to a protocol (usually HTTP/HTTPS or WebSocket). Conceptually, an endpoint maps a client intent to a server capability: retrieve a resource, submit data, or subscribe to updates. In a RESTful API, endpoints often follow noun-based paths (e.g., /users/123) combined with HTTP verbs (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) to indicate the operation.

Key technical elements of an endpoint include:

  • URI pattern (path and optional query parameters)
  • Supported methods (verbs) and expected payloads
  • Authentication and authorization requirements
  • Response format and status codes
  • Rate limiting and throttling rules

Endpoints can be public (open to third parties) or private (internal to a service mesh). For crypto-focused data integrations, api endpoints may also expose streaming interfaces (WebSockets) or webhook callbacks for asynchronous events. For example, Token Metrics is an example of an analytics provider that exposes APIs for research workflows.

Types of endpoints and common protocols

Different application needs favor different endpoint types and protocols:

  • REST endpoints (HTTP/HTTPS): Simple, stateless, and cache-friendly, ideal for resource CRUD operations and broad compatibility.
  • GraphQL endpoints: A single endpoint that accepts queries allowing clients to request exactly the fields they need; reduces overfetching but requires careful schema design and complexity control.
  • WebSocket endpoints: Bidirectional, low-latency channels for streaming updates (market data, notifications). Useful when real-time throughput matters.
  • Webhook endpoints: Server-to-server callbacks where your service exposes a publicly accessible endpoint to receive event notifications from another system.

Choosing a protocol depends on consistency requirements, latency tolerance, and client diversity. Hybrid architectures often combine REST for configuration and GraphQL/WebSocket for dynamic data.

Design best practices for robust API endpoints

Good endpoint design improves developer experience and system resilience. Follow these practical practices:

  1. Clear and consistent naming: Use predictable URI patterns and resource-oriented paths. Avoid action-based endpoints like /getUserData in favor of /users/{id}.
  2. Versioning: Expose versioned endpoints (e.g., /v1/users) to avoid breaking changes for consumers.
  3. Input validation: Validate payloads early and return explicit error codes and messages to guide client correction.
  4. Pagination and filtering: For list-heavy endpoints, require pagination tokens or limits to protect backend resources.
  5. Documentation and examples: Provide schema samples, curl examples, and expected response bodies to accelerate integration.

API schema tools (OpenAPI/Swagger, AsyncAPI) let you define endpoints, types, and contracts programmatically, enabling automated client generation, testing, and mock servers during development.

Security, rate limits, and monitoring

Endpoints are primary attack surfaces. Security and observability are critical:

  • Authentication & Authorization: Prefer token-based schemes (OAuth2, JWT) with granular scopes. Enforce least privilege for each endpoint.
  • Transport security: Enforce TLS, HSTS, and secure ciphers to protect data in transit.
  • Rate limiting & quotas: Apply per-key and per-IP limits to mitigate abuse and preserve quality of service.
  • Input sanitization: Prevent injection attacks by whitelisting allowed fields and escaping inputs.
  • Observability: Emit structured logs, traces, and metrics per endpoint. Monitor latency percentiles, error rates, and traffic patterns to detect regressions early.

Operational tooling such as API gateways, service meshes, and managed API platforms provide built-in policy enforcement for security and rate limiting, reducing custom code complexity.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

What is the difference between an api endpoint and an API?

An API is the overall contract and set of capabilities a service exposes; an api endpoint is a specific network address (URI) where one of those capabilities is accessible. Think of the API as the menu and endpoints as the individual dishes.

How should I secure a public api endpoint?

Use HTTPS only, require authenticated tokens with appropriate scopes, implement rate limits and IP reputation checks, and validate all input. Employ monitoring to detect anomalous traffic patterns and rotate credentials periodically.

When should I version my endpoints?

Introduce explicit versioning when you plan to make breaking changes to request/response formats or behavior. Semantic versioning in the path (e.g., /v1/) is common and avoids forcing clients to adapt unexpectedly.

What are effective rate-limiting strategies?

Combine per-key quotas, sliding-window or token-bucket algorithms, and burst allowances. Communicate limits via response headers and provide clear error codes and retry-after values so clients can back off gracefully.

Which metrics should I monitor for endpoints?

Track request rate (RPS), error rate (4xx/5xx), latency percentiles (p50, p95, p99), and active connections for streaming endpoints. Correlate with upstream/downstream service metrics to identify root causes.

When is GraphQL preferable to REST for endpoints?

Choose GraphQL when clients require flexible field selection and you want to reduce overfetching. Prefer REST for simple resource CRUD patterns and when caching intermediaries are important. Consider team familiarity and tooling ecosystem as well.

Disclaimer

The information in this article is technical and educational in nature. It is not financial, legal, or investment advice. Implementations should be validated in your environment and reviewed for security and compliance obligations specific to your organization.

Research

Understanding REST APIs: A Practical Guide

Token Metrics Team
5

Modern web and mobile apps exchange data constantly. At the center of that exchange is the REST API — a widely adopted architectural style that standardizes how clients and servers communicate over HTTP. Whether you are a developer, product manager, or researcher, understanding what a REST API is and how it works is essential for designing scalable systems and integrating services efficiently.

What is a REST API? Core principles

A REST API (Representational State Transfer Application Programming Interface) is a style for designing networked applications. It defines a set of constraints that, when followed, enable predictable, scalable, and loosely coupled interactions between clients (browsers, mobile apps, services) and servers. REST is not a protocol or standard; it is a set of architectural principles introduced by Roy Fielding in 2000.

Key principles include:

  • Statelessness: Each request from the client contains all information needed; the server does not store client session state between requests.
  • Resource orientation: Everything is modeled as a resource (users, orders, posts), each identified by a URI (Uniform Resource Identifier).
  • Uniform interface: A standard set of operations (typically HTTP methods) operate on resources in predictable ways.
  • Client-server separation: Clients and servers can evolve independently as long as the interface contract is maintained.
  • Cacheability: Responses can be labeled cacheable or non-cacheable to improve performance and scalability.

How REST APIs work: HTTP methods, status codes, and endpoints

A REST API organizes functionality around resources and uses standard HTTP verbs to manipulate them. Common conventions are:

  • GET — retrieve a resource or list of resources.
  • POST — create a new resource under a collection.
  • PUT — replace an existing resource or create if absent (idempotent).
  • PATCH — apply partial updates to a resource.
  • DELETE — remove a resource.

Responses use HTTP status codes to indicate result state (200 OK, 201 Created, 204 No Content, 400 Bad Request, 401 Unauthorized, 404 Not Found, 500 Internal Server Error). Payloads are typically JSON but can be XML or other formats. Endpoints are structured hierarchically, for example: /api/users to list users, /api/users/123 to operate on user with ID 123.

Design patterns and best practices for reliable APIs

Designing a robust REST API involves more than choosing verbs and URIs. Adopt patterns that make APIs understandable, maintainable, and secure:

  • Consistent naming: Use plural resource names (/products, /orders), and keep endpoints predictable.
  • Versioning: Expose versions (e.g., /v1/) to avoid breaking clients when changing the contract.
  • Pagination and filtering: For large collections, support parameters for page size, cursors, and search filters to avoid large responses.
  • Error handling: Return structured error responses with codes and human-readable messages to help client debugging.
  • Rate limiting and throttling: Protect backends by limiting request rates and providing informative headers.
  • Security: Use TLS, authenticate requests (OAuth, API keys), and apply authorization checks per resource.

Following these practices improves interoperability and reduces operational risk.

Use cases, tools, and how to test REST APIs

REST APIs are used across web services, microservices, mobile backends, IoT devices, and third-party integrations. Developers commonly use tools and practices to build and validate APIs:

  • API specifications: OpenAPI (formerly Swagger) describes endpoints, parameters, responses, and can be used to generate client/server code and documentation.
  • Testing tools: Postman, curl, and automated test frameworks (JUnit, pytest) validate behavior, performance, and regression checks.
  • Monitoring and observability: Logs, distributed tracing, and metrics (latency, error rates) help identify issues in production.
  • Client SDKs and code generation: Generate typed clients for multiple languages to reduce integration friction.

AI-driven platforms and analytics can speed research and debugging by surfacing usage patterns, anomalies, and integration opportunities. For example, Token Metrics can be used to analyze API-driven data feeds and incorporate on-chain signals into application decision layers without manual data wrangling.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

FAQ: What is REST API — common questions

What is the difference between REST and RESTful?

"REST" refers to the architectural constraints described by Roy Fielding; "RESTful" is a colloquial adjective meaning an API that follows REST principles. Not all APIs labeled RESTful implement every REST constraint strictly.

How does REST compare to SOAP and GraphQL?

SOAP is a protocol with rigid standards and built-in operations (often used in enterprise systems). GraphQL exposes a single endpoint and lets clients request precise data shapes. REST uses multiple endpoints and standard HTTP verbs. Each approach has trade-offs in flexibility, caching, and tooling.

When should I version my REST API?

Version your API before making breaking changes to request/response formats or behavior that existing clients depend on. Common strategies include URI versioning (e.g., /v1/) or header-based versioning.

Are REST APIs secure by default?

No. Security must be designed in: use HTTPS/TLS, authenticate requests, validate input, apply authorization checks, and limit rate to reduce abuse. Treat REST APIs like any other public interface that requires protection.

How do I test and document a REST API effectively?

Use API specifications (OpenAPI) to auto-generate docs and client stubs. Combine manual testing tools like Postman with automated integration and contract tests in CI pipelines to ensure consistent behavior across releases.

Can REST APIs handle streaming or real-time data?

REST is request/response oriented and not ideal for continuous real-time streams. For streaming, consider WebSockets, Server-Sent Events (SSE), or specialized protocols; REST can still be used for control operations and fallbacks.

Disclaimer: This article is educational and technical in nature. It does not provide investment or legal advice. The information is intended to explain REST API concepts and best practices, not to recommend specific products or actions.

Research

FastAPI: Build High-Performance Python APIs

Token Metrics Team
4

FastAPI has become a go-to framework for teams that need production-ready, high-performance APIs in Python. It combines modern Python features, automatic type validation via pydantic, and ASGI-based async support to deliver low-latency endpoints. This post breaks down pragmatic patterns for building, testing, and scaling FastAPI services, with concrete guidance on performance tuning, deployment choices, and observability so you can design robust APIs for real-world workloads.

Overview: Why FastAPI and where it fits

FastAPI is an ASGI framework that emphasizes developer experience and runtime speed. It generates OpenAPI docs automatically, enforces request/response typing, and integrates cleanly with async workflows. Compare FastAPI to traditional WSGI stacks (Flask, Django sync endpoints): FastAPI excels when concurrency and I/O-bound tasks dominate, and when you want built-in validation and schema-driven design.

Use-case scenarios where FastAPI shines:

  • Low-latency microservices handling concurrent I/O (databases, HTTP calls, queues).
  • AI/ML inference endpoints that require fast request routing and input validation.
  • Public APIs where OpenAPI/Swagger documentation and typed schemas reduce integration friction.

Async patterns and performance considerations

FastAPI leverages async/await to let a single worker handle many concurrent requests when operations are I/O-bound. Key principles:

  1. Avoid blocking calls inside async endpoints. Use async database drivers (e.g., asyncpg, databases) or wrap blocking operations in threadpools when necessary.
  2. Choose the right server. uvicorn (with or without Gunicorn) is common: uvicorn for development and Gunicorn+uvicorn workers for production. Consider Hypercorn for HTTP/2 or advanced ASGI features.
  3. Benchmark realistic scenarios. Use tools like wrk, k6, or hey to simulate traffic patterns similar to production. Measure p95/p99 latency, not just average response time.

Performance tuning checklist:

  • Enable HTTP keep-alive and proper worker counts (CPU cores × factor depending on blocking).
  • Cache expensive results (Redis, in-memory caches) and use conditional responses to reduce payloads.
  • Use streaming responses for large payloads to minimize memory spikes.

Design patterns: validation, dependency injection, and background tasks

FastAPI's dependency injection and pydantic models enable clear separation of concerns. Recommended practices:

  • Model-driven APIs: Define request and response schemas with pydantic. This enforces consistent validation and enables automatic docs.
  • Modular dependencies: Use dependency injection for DB sessions, auth, and feature flags to keep endpoints thin and testable.
  • Background processing: Use FastAPI BackgroundTasks or an external queue (Celery, RQ, or asyncio-based workers) for long-running jobs—avoid blocking the request lifecycle.

Scenario analysis: for CPU-bound workloads (e.g., heavy data processing), prefer external workers or serverless functions. For high-concurrency I/O-bound workloads, carefully tuned async endpoints perform best.

Deployment, scaling, and operational concerns

Deploying FastAPI requires choices around containers, orchestration, and observability:

  • Containerization: Create minimal Docker images (slim Python base, multi-stage builds) and expose an ASGI server like uvicorn with optimized worker settings.
  • Scaling: Horizontal scaling with Kubernetes or ECS works well. Use readiness/liveness probes and autoscaling based on p95 latency or CPU/memory metrics.
  • Security & rate limiting: Implement authentication at the edge (API gateway) and enforce rate limits (Redis-backed) to protect services. Validate inputs strictly with pydantic to avoid malformed requests.
  • Observability: Instrument metrics (Prometheus), distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry), and structured logs to diagnose latency spikes and error patterns.

CI/CD tips: include a test matrix for schema validation, contract tests against OpenAPI, and canary deploys for backward-incompatible changes.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

FAQ: What is FastAPI and how is it different?

FastAPI is a modern, ASGI-based Python framework focused on speed and developer productivity. It differs from traditional frameworks by using type hints for validation, supporting async endpoints natively, and automatically generating OpenAPI documentation.

FAQ: When should I use async endpoints versus sync?

Prefer async endpoints for I/O-bound operations like network calls or async DB drivers. If your code is CPU-bound, spawning background workers or using synchronous workers with more processes may be better to avoid blocking the event loop.

FAQ: How many workers or instances should I run?

There is no one-size-fits-all. Start with CPU core count as a baseline and adjust based on latency and throughput measurements. For async I/O-bound workloads, fewer workers with higher concurrency can be more efficient; for blocking workloads, increase worker count or externalize tasks.

FAQ: What are key security practices for FastAPI?

Enforce strong input validation with pydantic, use HTTPS, validate and sanitize user data, implement authentication and authorization (OAuth2, JWT), and apply rate limiting and request size limits at the gateway.

FAQ: How do I test FastAPI apps effectively?

Use TestClient from FastAPI for unit and integration tests, mock external dependencies, write contract tests against OpenAPI schemas, and include load tests in CI to catch performance regressions early.

Disclaimer

This article is for educational purposes only. It provides technical and operational guidance for building APIs with FastAPI and does not constitute professional or financial advice.

Choose from Platinum, Gold, and Silver packages
Reach with 25–30% open rates and 0.5–1% CTR
Craft your own custom ad—from banners to tailored copy
Perfect for Crypto Exchanges, SaaS Tools, DeFi, and AI Products