Crypto Basics

USDT vs USDC - An in-depth Comparison between Tether and USD Coin

Compare Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) in-depth: their similarities, differences, and unique features. Learn which one is right for you in this comprehensive guide.
S. Vishwa
7 Minutes
MIN

In the world of cryptocurrencies, stablecoins have gained significant popularity due to their ability to provide stability and reduce volatility. Among the various stablecoins available, Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) have emerged as two prominent contenders. 

Both USDT and USDC are pegged to the US dollar, aiming to maintain a 1:1 ratio with the fiat currency. However, they differ in terms of their underlying technology, transparency, and issuer.

In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between Tether and USD Coin to help you make an informed decision.

What are stablecoins?

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that are pegged to a stable asset, such as the US dollar. This provides stability and reduces volatility, making them a popular option for investors who want to avoid the fluctuations associated with traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

There are two main types of stablecoins: fiat-backed and crypto-backed. Fiat-backed stablecoins, like USDT and USDC, are backed by fiat currencies such as the US dollar. Crypto-backed stablecoins, on the other hand, are backed by other cryptocurrencies.

Understanding USDT and USDC

USDT, or Tether, is a fiat-backed stablecoin that is pegged to the US dollar. It was created in 2014 and is managed by Tether Limited. USDT is the most widely used stablecoin in the cryptocurrency market, with a market capitalization of over $60 billion.

USDC, or USD Coin, is also a fiat-backed stablecoin that is pegged to the US dollar. It was created in 2018 by Circle and Coinbase and is managed by the Centre Consortium. USDC has a market capitalization of over $27 billion.

Both USDT and USDC are ERC-20 tokens, which means they are built on the Ethereum blockchain.

USDT vs USDC: In-Depth Comparison

While USDT and USDC are similar in many ways, there are some key differences to consider.

Technology and Blockchain Infrastructure

Both USDT and USDC are built on different blockchain networks, which play a crucial role in their functionality and operations.

USDT: Riding on the Waves of Omni Layer and Ethereum

Tether (USDT) was initially launched on the Omni Layer protocol, which operates on the Bitcoin blockchain. However, to enhance efficiency and scalability, Tether later expanded its offerings to the Ethereum blockchain using the ERC-20 standard. This move allowed for faster transactions and wider compatibility with various cryptocurrency exchanges.

USDC: The Ethereum-Based Stablecoin

USD Coin (USDC), on the other hand, is primarily based on the Ethereum blockchain. As an ERC-20 token, it benefits from the robustness and extensive developer support of the Ethereum ecosystem. The Ethereum network provides a reliable infrastructure for USDC transactions and ensures secure and transparent operations.

Issuer and Trustworthiness

The entities responsible for issuing and maintaining USDT and USDC play a crucial role in establishing trust and credibility within the cryptocurrency community.

USDT: The Controversies and Transparency Concerns

Tether Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, is the issuer of Tether (USDT). Over the years, Tether has faced scrutiny and controversies surrounding its transparency and reserves. Questions have been raised about the company's ability to fully back each USDT token with an equivalent amount of USD reserves. While Tether has taken steps to address these concerns and provide periodic audits, some investors remain cautious.

USDC: Regulated and Transparent Approach

USD Coin (USDC) is a product of Centre Consortium, a collaborative effort between Circle and Coinbase. The consortium takes a regulated and transparent approach, providing regular attestations of its USDC reserves. These attestations are conducted by independent auditors to ensure that each USDC token is backed by a corresponding amount of USD held in reserve accounts.

Supply and Market Capitalization

The supply and market capitalization of stablecoins can significantly impact their liquidity and stability.

USDT: Leading the Stablecoin Market

Tether (USDT) has been the dominant stablecoin in the market for several years. With a substantial supply of tokens in circulation, USDT has established itself as a go-to stablecoin for many cryptocurrency traders and exchanges. The market capitalization of USDT has consistently been the highest among stablecoins.

USDC: Rapid Growth and Increasing Adoption

While USD Coin (USDC) entered the market later than USDT, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing adoption. The market capitalization of USDC has been steadily rising, reflecting the growing confidence and demand for this stablecoin. The increasing support from major cryptocurrency exchanges has contributed to the expansion of its user base.

Regulatory Compliance

The regulatory landscape surrounding stablecoins is evolving, and adherence to regulatory guidelines is crucial for their long-term viability.

USDT: Regulatory Scrutiny

Tether (USDT) has faced regulatory scrutiny in the past due to concerns over its transparency, reserve backing, and potential implications for the broader cryptocurrency market. As stablecoins gain more attention from regulators worldwide, Tether's compliance measures and engagement with regulatory authorities will play a significant role in its future.

USDC: Embracing Regulatory Compliance 

USD Coin (USDC) has taken a proactive approach to regulatory compliance. It has obtained licenses from various regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). By adhering to these regulations, USDC aims to provide a stablecoin that meets the compliance requirements of traditional financial systems.

Use Cases and Integration

Stablecoins offer various use cases, ranging from facilitating transactions to providing stability within decentralized finance (DeFi) applications.

USDT: Widely adopted in trading and Investments 

Due to its long-standing presence and high liquidity, Tether (USDT) is widely adopted in cryptocurrency trading and investments. It serves as a bridge between traditional fiat currencies and the crypto market, enabling seamless transfers and minimizing exposure to volatile assets during trading.

USDC: Fostering DeFi Applications 

USD Coin (USDC) has gained significant traction within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. Many DeFi protocols, such as lending platforms and decentralized exchanges, have integrated USDC as a stable asset for users to access the benefits of DeFi while minimizing exposure to market volatility.

The future of USDT and USDC

The future of USDT and USDC is uncertain, but both stablecoins are likely to continue to play an important role in the cryptocurrency market. As more people become interested in cryptocurrency, the demand for stablecoins is likely to increase.

There are also a number of new stablecoins being developed, such as Diem (formerly known as Libra), which is backed by Facebook. These new stablecoins could potentially challenge the dominance of USDT and USDC in the future.

Also Read - Future of Crypto in the Next 5 Years

Risks associated with USDT and USDC

While stablecoins like USDT and USDC are less volatile than traditional cryptocurrencies, they are not risk-free. One of the biggest risks is the potential for the stablecoin to lose its peg to the US dollar. This could happen if the company behind the stablecoin does not have enough reserves to back up the tokens in circulation.

There is also the risk of fraud or hacking. While USDT and USDC are considered to be relatively secure, there have been instances in the past where stablecoins have been hacked or stolen.

USDT vs USDC: Which is better for you?

Ultimately, the choice between USDT and USDC will depend on your individual needs and preferences. If you value transparency and security, USDC may be the better option for you. However, if you are looking for a stablecoin that is widely accepted in the cryptocurrency market, USDT may be the way to go.

It is also worth considering the fees associated with each stablecoin. USDT is often cheaper to use than USDC, which could be a deciding factor for some investors.

Where to buy USDT and USDC?

USDT and USDC can be bought and sold on a wide range of cryptocurrency exchanges. Some of the most popular exchanges include Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken.

Before buying either stablecoin, it is important to do your research and choose a reputable exchange. Look for an exchange that is widely used, regulated and has a good reputation in the cryptocurrency community.

Conclusion

Stablecoins like USDT and USDC have become an increasingly popular option for investors looking to mitigate volatility in the cryptocurrency market. Both stablecoins have their advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between them will ultimately depend on your individual needs and preferences. However, USDT has faced controversies and transparency concerns, while USDC takes a more transparent and regulated approach.

It is important to stay updated on the latest developments and regulatory changes surrounding stablecoins, as the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve. As with any investment, it is important to do your research and weigh the risks and rewards before investing in USDT, USDC or any other cryptocurrency.

If you're interested in learning more about cryptocurrency and how to invest in it, be sure to check out our other articles and resources.

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other sort of advice and you should not treat any of the website's content as such.

Token Metrics does not recommend that any cryptocurrency should be bought, sold, or held by you. Do conduct your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps &
AI Agents in Minutes, Not Months
Real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API.
Grab a Free API Key
Token Metrics Team
Token Metrics Team

Recent Posts

Research

API Gateway: Architecture, Patterns & Best Practices

Token Metrics Team
5
MIN

Modern distributed systems rely on effective traffic control, security, and observability at the edge. An API gateway centralizes those responsibilities, simplifying client access to microservices and serverless functions. This guide explains what an API gateway does, common architectural patterns, deployment and performance trade-offs, and design best practices for secure, scalable APIs.

What is an API Gateway?

An API gateway is a server-side component that sits between clients and backend services. It performs request routing, protocol translation, aggregation, authentication, rate limiting, and metrics collection. Instead of exposing each service directly, teams present a single, consolidated API surface to clients through the gateway. This centralization reduces client complexity, standardizes cross-cutting concerns, and can improve operational control.

Think of an API gateway as a policy and plumbing layer: it enforces API contracts, secures endpoints, and implements traffic shaping while forwarding requests to appropriate services.

Core Features and Architectural Patterns

API gateways vary in capability but commonly include:

  • Routing and reverse proxy: Direct requests to the correct backend based on path, headers, or other criteria.
  • Authentication and authorization: Validate tokens (JWT, OAuth2), integrate with identity providers, and enforce access policies.
  • Rate limiting and quotas: Protect backend services from overload and manage multi-tenant usage.
  • Request/response transformation: Convert between protocols (HTTP/gRPC), reshape payloads, or aggregate multiple service calls.
  • Observability: Emit metrics, traces, and structured logs for monitoring and debugging.

Common patterns include:

  1. Edge gateway: A public-facing gateway handling authentication, CDN integration, and basic traffic management.
  2. Internal gateway: Placed inside the trust boundary to manage east-west traffic within a cluster or VPC.
  3. Aggregating gateway: Combines multiple backend responses into a single client payload, useful for mobile or low-latency clients.
  4. Per-tenant gateway: For multi-tenant platforms, separate gateways per customer enforce isolation and custom policies.

Deployment Models and Performance Considerations

Choosing where and how to deploy an API gateway affects performance, resilience, and operational cost. Key models include:

  • Managed cloud gateways: Providers offer scalable gateways with minimal operational overhead. They simplify TLS, identity integration, and autoscaling but can introduce vendor lock-in and per-request costs.
  • Self-managed gateways: Run on Kubernetes or VMs for full control over configuration and plugins. This model increases operational burden but enables custom routing logic and deep integration with internal systems.
  • Sidecar or service mesh complement: In service mesh architectures, a gateway can front the mesh, delegating fine-grained service-to-service policies to sidecar proxies.

Performance trade-offs to monitor:

  • Latency: Each hop through the gateway adds processing time. Use lightweight filters, compiled rules, and avoid heavy transformations on hot paths.
  • Concurrency: Ensure the gateway and backend services scale independently. Backpressure, circuit breakers, and backoff strategies help prevent cascading failures.
  • Caching: Edge caching can drastically reduce load and latency for idempotent GET requests. Consider cache invalidation and cache-control headers carefully.

Design Best Practices and Security Controls

Adopt practical rules to keep gateways maintainable and secure:

  • Limit business logic: Keep the gateway responsible for orchestration and policy enforcement, not core business rules.
  • Token-based auth and scopes: Use scoped tokens and short lifetimes for session tokens. Validate signatures and token claims at the gateway level.
  • Observability-first: Emit structured logs, metrics, and distributed traces. Correlate gateway logs with backend traces for faster root cause analysis.
  • Throttling and quotas: Set conservative defaults and make limits configurable per client or plan. Implement graceful degradation for overloaded backends.
  • Policy-driven config: Use declarative policies (e.g., YAML or CRDs) to version and review gateway rules rather than ad-hoc runtime changes.

AI and analytics tools can accelerate gateway design and operating decisions by surfacing traffic patterns, anomaly detection, and vulnerability signals. For example, products that combine real-time telemetry with model-driven insights help prioritize which endpoints need hardened policies.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

What is an API gateway vs service mesh?

These technologies complement rather than replace each other. The API gateway handles north-south traffic (client to cluster), enforcing authentication and exposing public endpoints. A service mesh focuses on east-west traffic (service-to-service), offering fine-grained routing, mTLS, and telemetry between microservices. Many architectures use a gateway at the edge and a mesh internally for granular control.

FAQ: Common Questions About API Gateways

How does an API gateway impact latency?

A gateway introduces processing overhead for each request, which can increase end-to-end latency. Mitigations include optimizing filters, enabling HTTP/2 multiplexing, using local caches, and scaling gateway instances horizontally.

Do I need an API gateway for every architecture?

Not always. Small monoliths or single-service deployments may not require a gateway. For microservices, public APIs, or multi-tenant platforms, a gateway adds value by centralizing cross-cutting concerns and simplifying client integrations.

What security measures should the gateway enforce?

At minimum, the gateway should enforce TLS, validate authentication tokens, apply rate limits, and perform input validation. Additional controls include IP allowlists, web application firewall (WAF) rules, and integration with identity providers for RBAC.

Can API gateways aggregate responses from multiple services?

Yes. Aggregation reduces client round trips by composing responses from multiple backends. Use caching and careful error handling to avoid coupling performance of one service to another.

How do I test and version gateway policies?

Use a staging environment to run synthetic loads and functional tests against gateway policies. Store configurations in version control, run CI checks for syntax and policy conflicts, and roll out changes via canary deployments.

Is it better to use a managed gateway or self-host?

Managed gateways reduce operational overhead and provide scalability out of the box, while self-hosted gateways offer deeper customization and potentially lower long-term costs. Choose based on team expertise, compliance needs, and expected traffic patterns.

Disclaimer

This article is for educational and technical information only. It does not constitute investment, legal, or professional advice. Readers should perform their own due diligence when selecting and configuring infrastructure components.

Research

RESTful API Essentials: Design, Security, and Best Practices

Token Metrics Team
5
MIN

APIs are the connective tissue of modern applications; among them, RESTful APIs remain a dominant style because they map cleanly to HTTP semantics and scale well across distributed systems. This article breaks down what a RESTful API is, pragmatic design patterns, security controls, and practical monitoring and testing workflows. If you build or consume APIs, understanding these fundamentals reduces integration friction and improves reliability.

What is a RESTful API?

A RESTful API (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style for designing networked applications. At its core, REST leverages standard HTTP verbs (GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE) and status codes to perform operations on uniquely identified resources, typically represented as URLs. Key characteristics include:

  • Statelessness: Each request contains all information the server needs to fulfill it, enabling horizontal scaling.
  • Resource orientation: APIs expose resources (users, orders, blocks, etc.) rather than remote procedure calls.
  • Uniform interface: A consistent set of conventions for requests and responses, improving discoverability and client simplicity.

REST is a pragmatic guideline rather than a strict protocol; many APIs labeled "RESTful" adopt REST principles while introducing pragmatic extensions (e.g., custom headers, versioning strategies).

Design Principles & Resource Modeling

Good REST design begins with clear resource modeling. Ask: what are the nouns in the domain, and how do they relate? Use predictable URL structures and rely on HTTP semantics:

  • /resources - list or create a resource (GET to list, POST to create)
  • /resources/{id} - operate on a single resource (GET, PUT/PATCH, DELETE)
  • /resources/{id}/subresources - nested relationships when needed

Design tips to improve usability and longevity:

  1. Use consistent naming: plural nouns, lowercase, and hyphenation for readability.
  2. Support versioning: include a version in the URL or headers to avoid breaking clients (e.g., /v1/...).
  3. Leverage hypermedia judiciously: HATEOAS can improve discoverability but adds complexity; choose when it benefits clients.
  4. Pagination, filtering, sorting: standardize query parameters for large collections to avoid performance pitfalls.
  5. Use appropriate status codes: communicate success, client errors, and server errors clearly (200, 201, 400, 401, 403, 404, 429, 500, etc.).

Security, Authentication, and Rate Limiting

Security is a primary concern for any public-facing API. Typical controls and patterns include:

  • Authentication: OAuth 2.0 (Bearer tokens) and API keys are common. Choose a mechanism that fits your risk model and client types. Avoid transporting credentials in URLs.
  • Authorization: Implement least-privilege checks server-side to ensure tokens only permit intended actions.
  • Encryption: Always use TLS (HTTPS) to protect data in transit; consider TLS 1.2+ and strict ciphers.
  • Rate limiting and throttling: Protect backends from abuse with per-key or per-IP limits and provide informative 429 responses with Retry-After headers.
  • Input validation and sanitization: Validate request bodies and query parameters to reduce injection and parsing vulnerabilities.
  • Audit and logging: Log authentication events, rate-limit triggers, and error patterns while respecting privacy and compliance requirements.

Designing for security also means operational readiness: automated certificate rotation, secrets management, and periodic security reviews reduce long-term risk.

Performance, Monitoring, and AI-Assisted Tooling

Performance tuning for RESTful APIs covers latency, throughput, and reliability. Practical strategies include caching (HTTP Cache-Control, ETags), connection pooling, and database query optimization. Use observability tools to collect metrics (error rates, latency percentiles), distributed traces, and structured logs for rapid diagnosis.

AI-assisted tools can accelerate many aspects of API development and operations: anomaly detection in request patterns, automated schema inference from traffic, and intelligent suggestions for endpoint design or documentation. While these tools improve efficiency, validate automated changes through testing and staged rollouts.

When selecting tooling, evaluate clarity of integrations, support for your API architecture, and the ability to export raw telemetry for custom analysis.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

What distinguishes RESTful APIs from other API styles?

REST focuses on resources and uses HTTP semantics; GraphQL centralizes queries into a single endpoint with flexible queries, and gRPC emphasizes high-performance RPCs with binary protocols. Choose based on client needs, performance constraints, and schema evolution requirements.

How should I version a RESTful API without breaking clients?

Common approaches include URL versioning (e.g., /v1/), header-based versioning, or semantic versioning of the API contract. Regardless of method, document deprecation timelines and provide migration guides and compatibility layers where possible.

What are practical testing strategies for RESTful APIs?

Combine unit tests for business logic with integration tests that exercise endpoints and mocks for external dependencies. Use contract tests to ensure backward compatibility and end-to-end tests in staging environments. Automate tests in CI/CD to catch regressions early.

How do I design for backward compatibility?

Additive changes (new fields, endpoints) are generally safe; avoid removing fields, changing response formats, or repurposing status codes. Feature flags and content negotiation can help introduce changes progressively.

What should be included in API documentation?

Provide clear endpoint descriptions, request/response examples, authentication steps, error codes, rate limits, and code samples in multiple languages. Machine-readable specs (OpenAPI/Swagger) enable client generation and testing automation.

Disclaimer: This content is educational and informational only. It does not constitute professional, legal, security, or investment advice. Test and validate any architectural, security, or operational changes in environments that match your production constraints before rollout.

Research

Practical Guide to Claude API Integration

Token Metrics Team
4
MIN

The Claude API is increasingly used to build context-aware AI assistants, document summarizers, and conversational workflows. This guide breaks down what the API offers, integration patterns, capability trade-offs, and practical safeguards to consider when embedding Claude models into production systems.

Overview: What the Claude API Provides

The Claude API exposes access to Anthropic’s Claude family of large language models. At a high level, it lets developers send prompts and structured instructions and receive text outputs, completions, or assistant-style responses. Key delivery modes typically include synchronous completions, streaming tokens for low-latency interfaces, and tools for handling multi-turn context. Understanding input/output semantics and token accounting is essential before integrating Claude into downstream applications.

Capabilities & Feature Surface

Claude models are designed for safety-focused conversational AI and often emphasize instruction following and helpfulness while applying content filters. Typical features to assess:

  • Instruction clarity: Claude responds robustly to explicit, structured instructions and system-level guidelines embedded in prompts.
  • Context handling: Larger context windows enable multi-turn memory and long-document summarization; analyze limits for your use case.
  • Streaming vs batch: Streaming reduces perceived latency in chat apps. Batch completions suit offline generation and analytics tasks.
  • Safety layers: Built-in moderation and safety heuristics can reduce harmful outputs but should not replace application-level checks.

Integration Patterns & Best Practices

Designing a robust integration with the Claude API means balancing performance, cost, and safety. Practical guidance:

  1. Prompt engineering: Build modular prompts: system instructions, user content, and optional retrieval results. Keep system prompts explicit and version-controlled.
  2. Context management: Implement truncation or document retrieval to stay within context limits. Use semantic search to surface the most relevant chunks before calling Claude.
  3. Latency strategies: Use streaming for interactive UI and batch for background processing. Cache frequent completions when possible to reduce API calls.
  4. Safety & validation: Post-process outputs with rule-based checks, content filters, or secondary moderation models to catch hallucinations or policy violations.
  5. Monitoring: Track token usage, latency percentiles, and error rates. Instrument prompts to correlate model changes with downstream metrics.

Primary Use Cases and Risk Considerations

Claude API use cases span chat assistants, summarization, prompt-driven code generation, and domain-specific Q&A. For each area evaluate these risk vectors:

  • Hallucination risk: Models may fabricate facts; rely on provenance and retrieval augmentation when answers require accuracy.
  • Privacy: Avoid sending sensitive personal data unless contract and data processing terms explicitly permit it.
  • Regulatory exposure: For regulated domains (health, legal, finance) include human oversight and compliance review rather than treating outputs as authoritative.
  • Operational cost: Longer contexts and high throughput increase token costs; profile realistic workloads before scaling.

Tools, Libraries, and Ecosystem Fit

Tooling around Claude often mirrors other LLM APIs: HTTP/SDK clients, streaming libraries, and orchestration frameworks. Combine the Claude API with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, vector stores for semantic search, and lightweight caching layers. AI-driven research platforms such as Token Metrics can complement model outputs by providing analytics and signal overlays when integrating market or on-chain data into prompts.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

FAQ — What is the Claude API?

The Claude API is an interface for sending prompts and receiving text-based model outputs from the Claude family. It supports completions, streaming responses, and multi-turn conversations, depending on the provider’s endpoints.

FAQ — How do I manage long documents and context?

Implement a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach: index documents into a vector store, use semantic search to fetch relevant segments, and summarize or stitch results before sending a concise prompt to Claude. Also consider chunking and progressive summarization when documents exceed context limits.

FAQ — How can I control API costs?

Optimize prompts to be concise, cache common responses, batch non-interactive requests, and choose lower-capacity model variants for non-critical tasks. Monitor token usage and set alerts for unexpected spikes.

FAQ — What safety measures are recommended?

Combine Claude’s built-in safety mechanisms with application-level filters, content validation, and human review workflows. Avoid sending regulated or sensitive data without proper agreements and minimize reliance on unverified outputs.

FAQ — When should I use streaming vs batch responses?

Use streaming for interactive chat interfaces where perceived latency matters. Batch completions are suitable for offline processing, analytics, and situations where full output is required before downstream steps.

Disclaimer

This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute professional, legal, or financial advice. It explains technical capabilities and integration considerations for the Claude API without endorsing specific implementations. Review service terms, privacy policies, and applicable regulations before deploying AI systems in production.

Choose from Platinum, Gold, and Silver packages
Reach with 25–30% open rates and 0.5–1% CTR
Craft your own custom ad—from banners to tailored copy
Perfect for Crypto Exchanges, SaaS Tools, DeFi, and AI Products