Crypto Basics

USDT vs USDC - An in-depth Comparison between Tether and USD Coin

Compare Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) in-depth: their similarities, differences, and unique features. Learn which one is right for you in this comprehensive guide.
S. Vishwa
7 Minutes
MIN

In the world of cryptocurrencies, stablecoins have gained significant popularity due to their ability to provide stability and reduce volatility. Among the various stablecoins available, Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) have emerged as two prominent contenders. 

Both USDT and USDC are pegged to the US dollar, aiming to maintain a 1:1 ratio with the fiat currency. However, they differ in terms of their underlying technology, transparency, and issuer.

In this article, we will conduct an in-depth comparison between Tether and USD Coin to help you make an informed decision.

What are stablecoins?

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that are pegged to a stable asset, such as the US dollar. This provides stability and reduces volatility, making them a popular option for investors who want to avoid the fluctuations associated with traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

There are two main types of stablecoins: fiat-backed and crypto-backed. Fiat-backed stablecoins, like USDT and USDC, are backed by fiat currencies such as the US dollar. Crypto-backed stablecoins, on the other hand, are backed by other cryptocurrencies.

Understanding USDT and USDC

USDT, or Tether, is a fiat-backed stablecoin that is pegged to the US dollar. It was created in 2014 and is managed by Tether Limited. USDT is the most widely used stablecoin in the cryptocurrency market, with a market capitalization of over $60 billion.

USDC, or USD Coin, is also a fiat-backed stablecoin that is pegged to the US dollar. It was created in 2018 by Circle and Coinbase and is managed by the Centre Consortium. USDC has a market capitalization of over $27 billion.

Both USDT and USDC are ERC-20 tokens, which means they are built on the Ethereum blockchain.

USDT vs USDC: In-Depth Comparison

While USDT and USDC are similar in many ways, there are some key differences to consider.

Technology and Blockchain Infrastructure

Both USDT and USDC are built on different blockchain networks, which play a crucial role in their functionality and operations.

USDT: Riding on the Waves of Omni Layer and Ethereum

Tether (USDT) was initially launched on the Omni Layer protocol, which operates on the Bitcoin blockchain. However, to enhance efficiency and scalability, Tether later expanded its offerings to the Ethereum blockchain using the ERC-20 standard. This move allowed for faster transactions and wider compatibility with various cryptocurrency exchanges.

USDC: The Ethereum-Based Stablecoin

USD Coin (USDC), on the other hand, is primarily based on the Ethereum blockchain. As an ERC-20 token, it benefits from the robustness and extensive developer support of the Ethereum ecosystem. The Ethereum network provides a reliable infrastructure for USDC transactions and ensures secure and transparent operations.

Issuer and Trustworthiness

The entities responsible for issuing and maintaining USDT and USDC play a crucial role in establishing trust and credibility within the cryptocurrency community.

USDT: The Controversies and Transparency Concerns

Tether Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, is the issuer of Tether (USDT). Over the years, Tether has faced scrutiny and controversies surrounding its transparency and reserves. Questions have been raised about the company's ability to fully back each USDT token with an equivalent amount of USD reserves. While Tether has taken steps to address these concerns and provide periodic audits, some investors remain cautious.

USDC: Regulated and Transparent Approach

USD Coin (USDC) is a product of Centre Consortium, a collaborative effort between Circle and Coinbase. The consortium takes a regulated and transparent approach, providing regular attestations of its USDC reserves. These attestations are conducted by independent auditors to ensure that each USDC token is backed by a corresponding amount of USD held in reserve accounts.

Supply and Market Capitalization

The supply and market capitalization of stablecoins can significantly impact their liquidity and stability.

USDT: Leading the Stablecoin Market

Tether (USDT) has been the dominant stablecoin in the market for several years. With a substantial supply of tokens in circulation, USDT has established itself as a go-to stablecoin for many cryptocurrency traders and exchanges. The market capitalization of USDT has consistently been the highest among stablecoins.

USDC: Rapid Growth and Increasing Adoption

While USD Coin (USDC) entered the market later than USDT, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing adoption. The market capitalization of USDC has been steadily rising, reflecting the growing confidence and demand for this stablecoin. The increasing support from major cryptocurrency exchanges has contributed to the expansion of its user base.

Regulatory Compliance

The regulatory landscape surrounding stablecoins is evolving, and adherence to regulatory guidelines is crucial for their long-term viability.

USDT: Regulatory Scrutiny

Tether (USDT) has faced regulatory scrutiny in the past due to concerns over its transparency, reserve backing, and potential implications for the broader cryptocurrency market. As stablecoins gain more attention from regulators worldwide, Tether's compliance measures and engagement with regulatory authorities will play a significant role in its future.

USDC: Embracing Regulatory Compliance 

USD Coin (USDC) has taken a proactive approach to regulatory compliance. It has obtained licenses from various regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). By adhering to these regulations, USDC aims to provide a stablecoin that meets the compliance requirements of traditional financial systems.

Use Cases and Integration

Stablecoins offer various use cases, ranging from facilitating transactions to providing stability within decentralized finance (DeFi) applications.

USDT: Widely adopted in trading and Investments 

Due to its long-standing presence and high liquidity, Tether (USDT) is widely adopted in cryptocurrency trading and investments. It serves as a bridge between traditional fiat currencies and the crypto market, enabling seamless transfers and minimizing exposure to volatile assets during trading.

USDC: Fostering DeFi Applications 

USD Coin (USDC) has gained significant traction within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. Many DeFi protocols, such as lending platforms and decentralized exchanges, have integrated USDC as a stable asset for users to access the benefits of DeFi while minimizing exposure to market volatility.

The future of USDT and USDC

The future of USDT and USDC is uncertain, but both stablecoins are likely to continue to play an important role in the cryptocurrency market. As more people become interested in cryptocurrency, the demand for stablecoins is likely to increase.

There are also a number of new stablecoins being developed, such as Diem (formerly known as Libra), which is backed by Facebook. These new stablecoins could potentially challenge the dominance of USDT and USDC in the future.

Also Read - Future of Crypto in the Next 5 Years

Risks associated with USDT and USDC

While stablecoins like USDT and USDC are less volatile than traditional cryptocurrencies, they are not risk-free. One of the biggest risks is the potential for the stablecoin to lose its peg to the US dollar. This could happen if the company behind the stablecoin does not have enough reserves to back up the tokens in circulation.

There is also the risk of fraud or hacking. While USDT and USDC are considered to be relatively secure, there have been instances in the past where stablecoins have been hacked or stolen.

USDT vs USDC: Which is better for you?

Ultimately, the choice between USDT and USDC will depend on your individual needs and preferences. If you value transparency and security, USDC may be the better option for you. However, if you are looking for a stablecoin that is widely accepted in the cryptocurrency market, USDT may be the way to go.

It is also worth considering the fees associated with each stablecoin. USDT is often cheaper to use than USDC, which could be a deciding factor for some investors.

Where to buy USDT and USDC?

USDT and USDC can be bought and sold on a wide range of cryptocurrency exchanges. Some of the most popular exchanges include Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken.

Before buying either stablecoin, it is important to do your research and choose a reputable exchange. Look for an exchange that is widely used, regulated and has a good reputation in the cryptocurrency community.

Conclusion

Stablecoins like USDT and USDC have become an increasingly popular option for investors looking to mitigate volatility in the cryptocurrency market. Both stablecoins have their advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between them will ultimately depend on your individual needs and preferences. However, USDT has faced controversies and transparency concerns, while USDC takes a more transparent and regulated approach.

It is important to stay updated on the latest developments and regulatory changes surrounding stablecoins, as the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve. As with any investment, it is important to do your research and weigh the risks and rewards before investing in USDT, USDC or any other cryptocurrency.

If you're interested in learning more about cryptocurrency and how to invest in it, be sure to check out our other articles and resources.

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other sort of advice and you should not treat any of the website's content as such.

Token Metrics does not recommend that any cryptocurrency should be bought, sold, or held by you. Do conduct your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps &
AI Agents in Minutes, Not Months
Real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API.
Grab a Free API Key
Token Metrics Team
Token Metrics Team

Recent Posts

Research

Inside DeepSeek API: Advanced Search for Crypto Intelligence

Token Metrics Team
5
MIN

DeepSeek API has emerged as a specialized toolkit for developers and researchers who need granular, semantically rich access to crypto-related documents, on-chain data, and developer content. This article breaks down how the DeepSeek API works, common integration patterns, practical research workflows, and how AI-driven platforms can complement its capabilities without making investment recommendations.

What the DeepSeek API Does

The DeepSeek API is designed to index and retrieve contextual information across heterogeneous sources: whitepapers, GitHub repos, forum threads, on-chain events, and more. Unlike keyword-only search, DeepSeek focuses on semantic matching—returning results that align with the intent of a query rather than only literal token matches.

Key capabilities typically include:

  • Semantic embeddings for natural language search.
  • Document chunking and contextual retrieval for long-form content.
  • Metadata filtering (chain, contract address, author, date).
  • Streamed or batched query interfaces for different throughput needs.

Typical Architecture & Integration Patterns

Integrating the DeepSeek API into a product follows common design patterns depending on latency and scale requirements:

  1. Server-side retrieval layer: Your backend calls DeepSeek to fetch semantically ranked documents, then performs post-processing and enrichment before returning results to clients.
  2. Edge-caching and rate management: Cache popular queries and embeddings to reduce costs and improve responsiveness. Use exponential backoff and quota awareness for production stability.
  3. AI agent workflows: Use the API to retrieve context windows for LLM prompts—DeepSeek's chunked documents can help keep prompts relevant without exceeding token budgets.

When building integrations, consider privacy, data retention, and whether you need to host a private index versus relying on a hosted DeepSeek endpoint.

Research Workflows & Practical Tips

Researchers using the DeepSeek API can follow a repeatable workflow to ensure comprehensive coverage and defensible results:

  • Define intent and query templates: Create structured queries that capture entity names, contract addresses, or conceptual prompts (e.g., “protocol upgrade risks” + contract).
  • Layer filters: Use metadata to constrain results to a chain, date range, or document type to reduce noise.
  • Iterative narrowing: Start with wide semantic searches, then narrow with follow-up queries using top results as new seeds.
  • Evaluate relevance: Score results using both DeepSeek’s ranking and custom heuristics (recency, authoritativeness, on-chain evidence).
  • Document provenance: Capture source URLs, timestamps, and checksums for reproducibility.

For reproducible experiments, version your query templates and save query-result sets alongside analysis notes.

Limitations, Costs, and Risk Factors

Understanding the constraints of a semantic retrieval API is essential for reliable outputs:

  • Semantic drift: Embeddings and ranking models can favor topical similarity that may miss critical technical differences. Validate with deterministic checks (contract bytecode, event logs).
  • Data freshness: Indexing cadence affects the visibility of the newest commits or on-chain events. Verify whether the API supports near-real-time indexing if that matters for your use case.
  • Cost profile: High-volume or high-recall retrieval workloads can be expensive. Design sampling and caching strategies to control costs.
  • Bias and coverage gaps: Not all sources are equally represented. Cross-check against primary sources where possible.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

FAQ: What developers ask most about DeepSeek API

What data sources does DeepSeek index?

DeepSeek typically indexes a mix of developer-centric and community data: GitHub, whitepapers, documentation sites, forums, and on-chain events. Exact coverage depends on the provider's ingestion pipeline and configuration options you choose when provisioning indexes.

How do embeddings improve search relevance?

Embeddings map text into vector space where semantic similarity becomes measurable as geometric closeness. This allows queries to match documents by meaning rather than shared keywords, improving recall for paraphrased or conceptually related content.

Can DeepSeek return structured on-chain data?

While DeepSeek is optimized for textual retrieval, many deployments support linking to structured on-chain records. A common pattern is to return document results with associated on-chain references (contract addresses, event IDs) so downstream systems can fetch transaction-level details from block explorers or node APIs.

How should I evaluate result quality?

Use a combination of automated metrics (precision@k, recall sampling) and human review. For technical subjects, validate excerpts against source code, transaction logs, and authoritative docs to avoid false positives driven by surface-level similarity.

What are best practices for using DeepSeek with LLMs?

Keep retrieved context concise and relevant: prioritize high-salience chunks, include provenance for factual checks, and use retrieval augmentation to ground model outputs. Also, monitor token usage and prefer compressed summaries for long sources.

How does it compare to other crypto APIs?

DeepSeek is focused on semantic retrieval and contextual search, while other crypto APIs may prioritize raw market data, on-chain metrics, or analytics dashboards. Combining DeepSeek-style search with specialized APIs (for price, on-chain metrics, or signals) yields richer tooling for research workflows.

Where can I learn more or get a demo?

Explore provider docs and example use cases. For integrated AI research and ratings, see Token Metrics which demonstrates how semantic retrieval can be paired with model-driven analysis for structured insights.

Disclaimer

This article is for informational and technical education only. It does not constitute investment advice, endorsements, or recommendations. Evaluate tools and data sources critically and consider legal and compliance requirements before deployment.

Research

Practical Guide to Fabric API and Integrations

Token Metrics Team
5
MIN

Fabric API is a cornerstone for developers building permissioned blockchain solutions with Hyperledger Fabric. This article explains what Fabric APIs are, how they fit into Fabric's architecture, practical integration patterns, and how to evaluate tooling when you need reliable programmatic access to Fabric networks.

What is the Fabric API and why it matters

The term "Fabric API" broadly refers to the programmatic interfaces and SDKs that allow applications to interact with a Hyperledger Fabric network. These interfaces expose capabilities such as submitting transactions, querying ledger state, managing identities via Fabric CA, and deploying or invoking chaincode (smart contracts). For enterprise use cases—supply chain auditing, tokenized assets, or confidential data flows—the Fabric API is the gateway between business logic and the distributed ledger.

Key characteristics of Fabric APIs include:

  • Permissioned access: operations are gated by identity and certificate-based authentication.
  • Support for multiple languages: SDKs and chaincode runtimes enable JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java, and more.
  • Gateway patterns: modern Fabric versions favor the Gateway API for simplified connection management and transaction lifecycle handling.

Core components and SDKs to know

Interacting with Fabric typically involves several layers. Understanding these helps you choose the right API surface for your application:

  1. Fabric Gateway API: A high-level client API that simplifies endorsement, submission, and event handling. It abstracts peers, orderers, and channel configuration so developers can focus on transactions.
  2. Fabric SDKs: Language-specific SDKs (Node.js, Java, Go) provide programmatic access where fine-grained control is required—example: advanced endorsement policies, custom discovery, or private data collection management.
  3. Chaincode APIs: Chaincode runtimes expose an API surface for smart contract logic to access ledger state, emit events, and perform composite key queries.
  4. Fabric CA API: Certificate Authority endpoints for identity lifecycle operations—enrollment, revocation, and affiliation management—accessible via REST or SDK wrappers.
  5. REST/Proxy layers: Many deployments add a REST façade or API gateway in front of Fabric to translate HTTP requests to SDK calls, add RBAC, rate limiting, and telemetry.

Design patterns and integration best practices

Choosing how to surface Fabric functionality depends on risk, latency, and operational model. Common patterns include:

  • Direct SDK clients: Suitable for backend services with secure key management that need direct ledger access and deterministic transaction flows.
  • Gateway + Microservice: Use the Fabric Gateway for transaction orchestration behind microservices that encapsulate business logic and validation.
  • REST API gateway: A REST façade simplifies integration with web and mobile apps. Add authorization checks, input validation, and transformation layers to prevent malformed transactions reaching the ledger.
  • Event-driven integrations: Subscribe to Fabric events (block/chaincode events) to trigger downstream processes or ML pipelines for analytics and monitoring.

Cross-cutting concerns to design for:

  • Identity management: Use Fabric CA and hardware-backed keys where possible; separate admin and application identities.
  • Determinism and validation: Ensure chaincode logic is deterministic and validated across peers to avoid endorsement failures.
  • Observability: Instrument SDK calls, latency, retry behavior, and endorsement responses to troubleshoot production issues.

Practical steps for building, testing, and securing Fabric API integrations

Follow a structured approach when integrating with Fabric networks:

  1. Prototype locally: Use test networks (Fabric samples or Docker-based local networks) to validate transaction flows and endorsement policies before deploying to staging.
  2. Choose the right API layer: For rapid development, the Gateway API with the Node SDK reduces boilerplate. For advanced control, use language-specific SDKs and custom connection profiles.
  3. Implement a façade for public clients: Never expose Fabric SDK credentials to browsers or untrusted environments—place a server-side API between clients and Fabric.
  4. Automate CI/CD: Include unit tests for chaincode logic, integration tests against ephemeral networks, and deployment pipelines for chaincode packaging and approvals.
  5. Security posture: Enforce TLS, rotate certificates, isolate admin operations, and employ least-privilege identities for applications.

Testing tips: use channel-level mock data, replay recorded endorsement responses for deterministic unit tests, and simulate peer failures to validate client retry logic.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

FAQ: What is the Fabric API?

The Fabric API comprises SDKs, the Gateway API, chaincode interfaces, and CA endpoints that let applications manage identities, submit transactions, and query ledger state on Hyperledger Fabric networks.

FAQ: How do I choose between Gateway and direct SDKs?

Use the Gateway API for simpler, high-level transaction workflows and reduced configuration. Choose direct SDKs when you need low-level control over discovery, endorsement policies, or custom peer selection logic.

FAQ: Can I expose Fabric functionality via REST?

Yes. Implement a secure REST proxy or API gateway to translate HTTP calls to Fabric SDK operations. This adds flexibility for web/mobile clients but requires careful identity and input validation.

FAQ: What are best practices for identity and key management?

Use Fabric CA for certificate issuance, adopt hardware-backed key stores where possible, separate admin and app roles, and rotate/revoke certificates according to policy. Avoid embedding private keys in client-side code.

FAQ: How should I monitor Fabric API usage and performance?

Instrument SDK calls, capture latency and endorsement statistics, log chaincode events, and integrate with observability stacks (Prometheus/Grafana). Monitor peer health and orderer topology to correlate API issues with network state.

FAQ: What common pitfalls should I watch for?

Common issues include endorsement mismatches due to non-deterministic chaincode, exposing credentials to clients, insufficient testing of policy changes, and lacking observability for transaction failures.

Disclaimer: This article is educational and technical in nature. It does not provide financial, legal, or regulatory advice. Implementations should be validated against your organization's compliance and security requirements.

Research

REST API Explained: Design, Security & Best Practices

Token Metrics Team
4
MIN

REST APIs are the connective tissue of modern web and mobile applications. Whether you're integrating services, building microservices, or exposing data for AI agents, a clear grasp of REST API principles helps you design interfaces that are maintainable, performant, and secure. This guide walks through the core concepts, practical design patterns, authentication and security considerations, and tooling that make REST APIs reliable in production.

What is a REST API and core principles

REST (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style that uses standard HTTP verbs and status codes to manipulate resources. Key tenets include:

  • Statelessness: Each request contains all information needed to process it; servers don’t maintain client session state.
  • Resources and representations: Resources are identified by URIs; responses return representations (JSON, XML) describing resource state.
  • Uniform interface: Use predictable HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH) and status codes for consistent client-server interaction.
  • Layered system: Clients need not be aware of whether they communicate with the origin server or an intermediary.

Understanding these principles helps when choosing between REST, GraphQL, or RPC for a given use case. REST is well-suited for CRUD-style operations, caching, and wide compatibility with HTTP tooling.

Design patterns: resources, versioning, and idempotency

Good API design starts with modeling resources and their relationships. Practical patterns include:

  • Resource naming: Use plural nouns and hierarchical paths (e.g., /users/{userId}/orders).
  • Versioning: Use URL or header-based versioning (e.g., /v1/ or Accept header) to avoid breaking clients.
  • Idempotency: Ensure methods like PUT and DELETE can be retried safely; supply idempotency keys for POST when necessary.
  • Pagination and filtering: Provide cursor-based or offset-based pagination, with clear metadata for total counts and next cursors.

Design with backward compatibility in mind: deprecate endpoints with clear timelines, and prefer additive changes over breaking ones.

Authentication, authorization, and security considerations

Security is non-negotiable. Common, interoperable mechanisms include:

  • API keys: Simple and useful for identifying applications, but pair with TLS and usage restrictions.
  • OAuth 2.0: Industry-standard for delegated authorization in user-centric flows; combine with short-lived tokens and refresh tokens.
  • JWTs: JSON Web Tokens are compact bearer tokens useful for stateless auth; validate signatures and expiration, and avoid storing sensitive data in payloads.
  • Transport security: Enforce TLS (HTTPS) everywhere and use HSTS policies; mitigate mixed-content risks.
  • Rate limiting & throttling: Protect backends from abuse and accidental spikes; return clear headers that expose remaining quota and reset times.

Also consider CORS policies, input validation, and strict output encoding to reduce injection risks. Implement principle of least privilege for every endpoint and role.

Performance, observability, and tooling

Operational maturity requires monitoring and testing across the lifecycle. Focus on these areas:

  • Caching: Use HTTP cache headers (Cache-Control, ETag) and CDN fronting for public resources to reduce latency and load.
  • Instrumentation: Emit structured logs, request traces (OpenTelemetry), and metrics (latency, error rate, throughput) to diagnose issues quickly.
  • API specifications: Define schemas with OpenAPI/Swagger to enable client generation, validation, and interactive docs.
  • Testing: Automate contract tests, integration tests, and fuzzing for edge cases; run load tests to establish scaling limits.
  • Developer experience: Provide SDKs, clear examples, and consistent error messages to accelerate integration and reduce support overhead.

Tooling choices—Postman, Insomnia, Swagger UI, or automated CI checks—help maintain quality as the API evolves. For AI-driven integrations, exposing well-documented JSON schemas and stable endpoints is critical.

Build Smarter Crypto Apps & AI Agents with Token Metrics

Token Metrics provides real-time prices, trading signals, and on-chain insights all from one powerful API. Grab a Free API Key

What is REST and when should I choose it?

REST is ideal for resource-oriented services where standard HTTP semantics are beneficial. Choose REST when caching, simplicity, wide client compatibility, and predictable CRUD semantics are priorities. For highly dynamic queries, consider GraphQL as a complement rather than a replacement.

How do I manage breaking changes?

Version endpoints, use feature flags, and publish changelogs with migration guides. Prefer additive changes (new fields, new endpoints) and give clients time to migrate before removing legacy behavior.

What authentication method should I implement?

Match the method to the use case: API keys for server-to-server integrations, OAuth 2.0 for delegated user access, and JWTs for stateless session claims. Always layer these with TLS and short token lifetimes.

How should I handle rate limits and abuse?

Enforce per-key and per-IP limits, surface quota headers, and provide graceful 429 responses with a Retry-After header. Use adaptive throttling to protect critical downstream systems.

Which tools help maintain a healthy API lifecycle?

Adopt OpenAPI for specs, use Postman or Swagger UI for exploratory testing, integrate contract tests into CI, and deploy observability stacks (Prometheus, Grafana, OpenTelemetry) to monitor behavior in production.

Disclaimer

This article is for educational and technical guidance only. It does not constitute legal, security, or operational advice. Evaluate risks and compliance requirements against your own environment before implementing changes.

Choose from Platinum, Gold, and Silver packages
Reach with 25–30% open rates and 0.5–1% CTR
Craft your own custom ad—from banners to tailored copy
Perfect for Crypto Exchanges, SaaS Tools, DeFi, and AI Products