Research

Why Is Web3 UX Still Poor Compared to Web2? Understanding the Challenges in 2025

Explore the core challenges of Web3 user experience in 2025 and discover how platforms like Token Metrics are paving the way for more user-friendly blockchain applications.

Token Metrics Team

Web3 promises to revolutionize the internet by decentralizing control, empowering users with data ownership, and eliminating middlemen. The technology offers improved security, higher user autonomy, and innovative ways to interact with digital assets. With the Web3 market value expected to reach $81.5 billion by 2030, the potential seems limitless. Yet anyone who's interacted with blockchain products knows the uncomfortable truth: Web3 user experience often feels more like punishment than promise. From nerve-wracking first crypto transactions to confusing wallet popups and sudden unexplained fees, Web3 products still have a long way to go before achieving mainstream adoption. If you ask anyone in Web3 what the biggest hurdle for mass adoption is, UX is more than likely to be the answer. This comprehensive guide explores why Web3 UX remains significantly inferior to Web2 experiences in 2025, examining the core challenges, their implications, and how platforms like Token Metrics are bridging the gap between blockchain complexity and user-friendly crypto investing.

The Fundamental UX Gap: Web2 vs Web3

To understand Web3's UX challenges, we must first recognize what users expect based on decades of Web2 evolution. Web2, the "read-write" web that started in 2004, enhanced internet engagement through user-generated content, social media platforms, and cloud-based services with intuitive interfaces that billions use daily without thought.

Web2 applications provide seamless experiences: one-click logins via Google or Facebook, instant account recovery through email, predictable transaction costs, and familiar interaction patterns across platforms. Users have become accustomed to frictionless digital experiences that just work.

Web3, by contrast, introduces entirely new paradigms requiring users to manage cryptographic wallets, understand blockchain concepts, navigate multiple networks, pay variable gas fees, and take full custody of their assets. This represents a fundamental departure from familiar patterns, creating immediate friction.

Core Challenges Plaguing Web3 UX

1. Complex Onboarding and Wallet Setup

The first interaction with most decentralized applications asks users to "Connect Wallet." If you don't have MetaMask or another compatible wallet, you're stuck before even beginning. This creates an enormous barrier to entry where Web2 simply asks for an email address.

Setting up a Web3 wallet requires understanding seed phrases—12 to 24 random words that serve as the master key to all assets. Users must write these down, store them securely, and never lose them, as there's no "forgot password" option. One mistake means permanent loss of funds.

Most DeFi platforms and crypto wallets nowadays still have cumbersome and confusing interfaces for wallet creation and management. The registration process, which in Web2 takes seconds through social login options, becomes a multi-step educational journey in Web3.

2. Technical Jargon and Blockchain Complexity

Most challenges in UX/UI design for blockchain stem from lack of understanding of the technology among new users, designers, and industry leaders. Crypto jargon and complex concepts of the decentralized web make it difficult to grasp product value and master new ways to manage funds.

Getting typical users to understand complicated blockchain ideas represents one of the main design challenges. Concepts like wallets, gas fees, smart contracts, and private keys must be streamlined without compromising security or usefulness—a delicate balance few projects achieve successfully.

The blockchain itself is a complex theory requiring significant learning to fully understand. Web3 tries converting this specialized domain knowledge into generalist applications where novices should complete tasks successfully. When blockchain products first started being developed, most were created by experts for experts, resulting in products with extreme pain points, accessibility problems, and complex user flows.

3. Multi-Chain Fragmentation and Network Switching

Another common headache in Web3 is managing assets and applications across multiple blockchains. Today, it's not uncommon for users to interact with Ethereum, Polygon, Solana, or several Layer 2 solutions—all in a single session.

Unfortunately, most products require users to manually switch networks in wallets, manually add new networks, or rely on separate bridges to transfer assets. This creates fragmented and confusing experiences where users must understand which network each asset lives on and how to move between them.

Making users distinguish between different networks creates unnecessary cognitive burden. In Web2, users never think about which server hosts their data—it just works. Web3 forces constant network awareness, breaking the illusion of seamless interaction.

4. Unpredictable and Confusing Gas Fees

Transaction costs in Web3 are variable, unpredictable, and often shockingly expensive. Users encounter sudden, unexplained fees that can range from cents to hundreds of dollars depending on network congestion. There's no way to know costs precisely before initiating transactions, creating anxiety and hesitation.

Web3 experiences generally run on public chains, leading to scalability problems as multiple parties make throughput requests. The more transactions that occur, the higher gas fees become—an unsustainable model as more users adopt applications.

Users shouldn't have to worry about paying high gas fees as transaction costs. Web2 transactions happen at predictable costs or are free to users, with businesses absorbing payment processing fees. Web3's variable cost structure creates friction at every transaction.

5. Irreversible Transactions and Error Consequences

In Web2, mistakes are forgivable. Sent money to the wrong person? Contact support. Made a typo? Edit or cancel. Web3 offers no such mercy. Blockchain's immutability means transactions are permanent—send crypto to the wrong address and it's gone forever.

This creates enormous anxiety around every action. Users must triple-check addresses (long hexadecimal strings impossible to memorize), verify transaction details, and understand that one mistake could cost thousands. The nerve-wracking experience of making first crypto transactions drives many users away permanently.

6. Lack of Customer Support and Recourse

Web2 platforms offer customer service: live chat, email support, phone numbers, and dispute resolution processes. Web3's decentralized nature eliminates these safety nets. There's no one to call when things go wrong, no company to reverse fraudulent transactions, no support ticket system to resolve issues.

This absence of recourse amplifies fear and reduces trust. Users accustomed to consumer protections find Web3's "code is law" philosophy terrifying rather than empowering, especially when their money is at stake.

7. Poor Error Handling and Feedback

Web3 applications often provide cryptic error messages that technical users struggle to understand, let alone mainstream audiences. "Transaction failed" without explanation, "insufficient gas" without context, or blockchain-specific error codes mean nothing to average users.

Good UX requires clear, actionable feedback. Web2 applications excel at this—telling users exactly what went wrong and how to fix it. Web3 frequently leaves users confused, frustrated, and unable to progress.

8. Inconsistent Design Patterns and Standards

Crypto designs are easily recognizable by dark backgrounds, pixel art, and Web3 color palettes. But when hundreds of products have the same mysterious look, standing out while maintaining blockchain identity becomes challenging.

More problematically, there are no established UX patterns for Web3 interactions. Unlike Web2, where conventions like hamburger menus, shopping carts, and navigation patterns are universal, Web3 reinvents wheels constantly. Every application handles wallet connections, transaction confirmations, and network switching differently, forcing users to relearn basic interactions repeatedly.

9. Developer-Driven Rather Than User-Centric Design

The problem with most DeFi startups and Web3 applications is that they're fundamentally developer-driven rather than consumer-friendly. When blockchain products first launched, they were created by technical experts who didn't invest effort in user experience and usability.

This technical-first approach persists today. Products prioritize blockchain purity, decentralization orthodoxy, and feature completeness over simplicity and accessibility. The result: powerful tools that only experts can use, excluding the masses these technologies purportedly serve.

10. Privacy Concerns in User Research

The Web3 revolution caught UI/UX designers by surprise. The Web3 community values privacy and anonymity, making traditional user research challenging. How do you design for someone you don't know and who deliberately stays anonymous?

Researching without compromising user privacy becomes complex, yet dedicating time to deep user exploration remains essential for building products that resonate with actual needs rather than developer assumptions.

Why These Challenges Persist in 2025

Despite years of development and billions in funding, Web3 UX remains problematic for several structural reasons:

Technical Constraints: Blockchain's decentralized architecture inherently creates friction. Distributed consensus, cryptographic security, and immutability—the features making Web3 valuable—also make it complex.
Rapid Evolution: Due to rapid progress in Web3 technology, UX designers face unique challenges building interfaces that can adapt to new standards, protocols, and developments without complete redesigns. They must plan for future innovations while maintaining consistent experiences.
Limited UX Talent: Many UX designers still aren't into Web3, making it hard to understand and convey the value of innovative crypto products. The talent gap between Web2 UX expertise and Web3 understanding creates suboptimal design outcomes.
Economic Incentives: Early Web3 projects targeted crypto-native users who tolerated poor UX for technology benefits. Building for mainstream users requires different priorities and investments that many projects defer.

The Path Forward: Solutions Emerging in 2025

Despite challenges, innovative solutions are emerging to bridge the Web3 UX gap:

Account Abstraction and Smart Wallets

Modern crypto wallets embrace account abstraction enabling social recovery (using trusted contacts to restore access), seedless wallet creation via Multi-Party Computation, and biometric logins. These features make self-custody accessible without sacrificing security.

Email-Based Onboarding

Forward-looking approaches use email address credentials tied to Web3 wallets. Companies like Magic and Web3Auth create non-custodial wallets behind familiar email login interfaces using multi-party compute techniques, removing seed phrases from user experiences entirely.

Gasless Transactions

Some platforms absorb transaction costs or implement Layer 2 solutions dramatically reducing fees, creating predictable cost structures similar to Web2.

Unified Interfaces

Progressive platforms abstract blockchain complexity, presenting familiar Web2-like experiences while handling Web3 mechanics behind the scenes. Users interact through recognizable patterns without needing to understand underlying technology.

Discover Crypto Gems with Token Metrics AI

Discover Crypto Gems with Token Metrics AI

Token Metrics uses AI-powered analysis to help you uncover profitable opportunities in the crypto market. Get Started For Free

The Future of Web3 UX

The ultimate success of Web3 hinges on user experience. No matter how revolutionary the technology, it will remain niche if everyday people find it too confusing, intimidating, or frustrating. Gaming, FinTech, digital identity, social media, and publishing will likely become Web3-enabled within the next 5 to 10 years—but only if UX improves dramatically.

UX as a competitive advantage, early design focus, and convergence with Web2 patterns are critical strategies for adoption. Designing for education and familiarity helps build trust, making blockchain invisibly integrated into daily digital interactions.

Conclusion: From Barrier to Bridge

Web3 UX remains significantly inferior to Web2 in 2025 due to fundamental challenges: complex onboarding, technical jargon, multi-chain fragmentation, unpredictable fees, irreversible errors, lack of support, poor feedback, inconsistent patterns, developer-centric design, and constrained user research. These stem from blockchain's architectural realities and the technical origins of the ecosystem. However, emerging solutions like account abstraction, email onboarding, gasless transactions, and unified interfaces demonstrate that blockchain’s power can be delivered through familiar and accessible user experiences.

Platforms like Token Metrics exemplify how prioritizing user needs and abstracting complexity enables mainstream adoption. To succeed, designers and developers must focus on user-centric principles, continuously adapting technology to meet user expectations rather than forcing users to adapt to blockchain complexities. The future belongs to platforms that make blockchain invisible, delivering benefits seamlessly and intuitively. As 2025 progresses, the gap between Web2 and Web3 UX will narrow, driven by competition, standardization, and the recognition that accessibility is key to success. Leveraging platforms like Token Metrics provides a glimpse of this user-friendly future, where powerful blockchain capabilities enhance everyday digital life without requiring technical expertise or patience.

Index

Overview of Solana Blockchain

About Token Metrics

Token Metrics: AI-powered crypto research and ratings platform. We help investors make smarter decisions with unbiased Token Metrics Ratings, on-chain analytics, and editor-curated “Top 10” guides. Our platform distills thousands of data points into clear scores, trends, and alerts you can act on.

30 Employees

analysts, data scientists, and crypto engineers

Daily Briefings

concise market insights and “Top Picks”

Transparent & Compliant

Sponsored ≠ Ratings; research remains independent

Explore Ratings Contact Us

Browse by Category

Recent – Latest posts across all categories.

Token Metrics API – How to use the TM API with examples & code.

API Updates – Changelogs and new endpoints.

Announcements– Product launches, partnerships, company news.

Crypto Basics – Beginner explainers and how-tos.

Research – Data-driven market insights and Ratings deep dives.

NFTs – Guides and trends across NFTs & gaming

Tools

Trade Recommendations (Moonshots)

Token Research Chatbot

Automated Portfolios & Indices

Trading Signals & AI Ratings

Token Analytics & Details

Price Predictions

Create Your Free Token Metrics Account

Access our Ratings Page for valuable token insights

Explore our Market Page for a comprehensive market overview

Stay in the loop with exclusive weekly Newsletters filled with insider tips and updates

Join our private Telegram group for exclusive community access

Create Your Free Account

Avalanche Price Prediction 2027: $25-$320 Target Analysis

Token Metrics Team

6 min read

Avalanche Price Prediction: AVAX in the 2027 Landscape

The Layer 1 competitive landscape is consolidating as markets recognize that specialization matters more than being a generic alternative to Ethereum. Avalanche positions itself in this multi-chain world with specific technical and ecosystem advantages. Infrastructure maturity around custody, bridges, and developer tooling makes alternative L1s more accessible heading into 2026.

The price prediction scenario projections below map different market share outcomes for AVAX across varying total crypto market sizes. Base case price predictions assume Avalanche maintains current ecosystem momentum, while moon scenarios factor in accelerated adoption, and bear cases reflect increased competitive pressure.

Disclosure

Educational purposes only, not financial advice. Crypto is volatile, do your own research and manage risk.

How to read it: Each band blends cycle analogues and market-cap share math with TA guardrails. Base assumes steady adoption and neutral or positive macro. Moon layers in a liquidity boom. Bear assumes muted flows and tighter liquidity.

TM Agent baseline:

Token Metrics lead metric for Avalanche price prediction, cashtag $AVAX, is a TM Grade of 66.2%, which maps to Hold, and the trading signal is bearish, indicating short-term downward momentum. Concise long-term numeric price prediction view, 12-month horizon: Token Metrics' scenarios center around a price band roughly between $15 and $40, with a base case price target near $25. Market context: Bitcoin's direction remains the primary market driver, so broader crypto risk-on conditions are required for $AVAX to reach the higher price prediction scenario.

Live details: Avalanche Token Details

Affiliate Disclosure: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made via this link, at no extra cost to you.

Key Takeaways for AVAX Price Prediction

Scenario driven: price prediction outcomes hinge on total crypto market cap; higher liquidity and adoption lift the price bands
Fundamentals: Fundamental Grade 91.63% (Community 82%, Tokenomics 100%, Exchange 100%, VC 97%, DeFi Scanner 83%)
Technology: Technology Grade 80.52% (Activity 80%, Repository 72%, Collaboration 93%, Security 59%, DeFi Scanner 83%)
TM Agent gist: AVAX shows decent fundamentals with a Hold grade, short-term momentum is bearish, and a 12-month price prediction range clusters around $15 to $40 with a base near $25
Education only, not financial advice

Avalanche Price Prediction: Scenario Analysis

Token Metrics price prediction scenarios span four market cap tiers, each representing different levels of crypto market maturity and liquidity:

8T Market Cap Price Prediction:

At an eight trillion dollar total crypto market cap, AVAX price prediction projects to $45.63 in bear conditions, $54.07 in the base case, and $62.50 in bullish scenarios.

16T Market Cap Price Prediction:

Doubling the market to sixteen trillion expands the price prediction range to $97.92 (bear), $123.23 (base), and $148.53 (moon).

‍

23T Market Cap Price Prediction:

At twenty-three trillion, the price forecast scenarios show $150.20, $192.38, and $234.56 respectively.

31T Market Cap Price Prediction:

In the maximum liquidity scenario of thirty-one trillion, AVAX price prediction could reach $202.49 (bear), $261.54 (base), or $320.59 (moon).

Each tier assumes progressively stronger market conditions, with the base case reflecting steady growth and the moon case requiring sustained bull market dynamics.

Why Consider the Indices with Top-100 Exposure

Avalanche represents one opportunity among hundreds in crypto markets. Token Metrics Indices bundle AVAX with top one hundred assets for systematic exposure to the strongest projects. Single tokens face idiosyncratic risks that diversified baskets mitigate.

Historical index performance demonstrates the value of systematic diversification versus concentrated positions.

Join the early access list

What Is Avalanche?

Avalanche is a smart-contract platform known for high throughput, low latency, and a modular subnet architecture. It aims to support decentralized finance, gaming, and enterprise applications with fast finality and cost-efficient transactions.

AVAX is the native token used for fees, staking, and network security, and it powers activity across application subnets. The ecosystem positions Avalanche among leading Layer 1s competing for developer mindshare and user adoption.

Token Metrics AI Analysis for Price Prediction

Token Metrics AI provides comprehensive context on Avalanche's positioning and challenges that inform our price prediction models.

Vision: Avalanche aims to provide a highly scalable, secure, and decentralized platform for launching custom blockchains and decentralized applications. Its vision centers on enabling a global, open financial system and supporting a diverse ecosystem of interoperable blockchains.

Problem: Many blockchain networks face trade-offs between speed, security, and decentralization, often resulting in high fees and slow transaction times during peak demand. Avalanche addresses the need for a scalable and efficient infrastructure that can support widespread adoption of dApps and enterprise use cases without compromising on performance or security.

Solution: Avalanche uses a novel consensus mechanism that achieves rapid finality with low energy consumption, differentiating it from traditional Proof-of-Work systems. It employs a three-chain architecture—Exchange Chain (X-Chain), Platform Chain (P-Chain), and Contract Chain (C-Chain)—to separate functions like asset creation, staking, and smart contract execution, enhancing efficiency and scalability.

Market Analysis: Avalanche operates in the competitive Layer 1 blockchain space. It differentiates itself through its consensus protocol and support for subnet-based custom blockchains. Adoption is influenced by developer activity, partnerships, and integration with major DeFi protocols, with risks from technological shifts and regulatory developments.

Fundamental and Technology Snapshot from Token Metrics

Fundamental Grade: 91.63% (Community 82%, Tokenomics 100%, Exchange 100%, VC 97%, DeFi Scanner 83%).

Technology Grade: 80.52% (Activity 80%, Repository 72%, Collaboration 93%, Security 59%, DeFi Scanner 83%).

Catalysts That Skew Bullish for Price Prediction

Institutional and retail access expands with ETFs, listings, and integrations
Macro tailwinds from lower real rates and improving liquidity
Product or roadmap milestones such as upgrades, scaling, or partnerships
These factors could push AVAX toward higher price prediction targets

Risks That Skew Bearish for Price Prediction

Macro risk-off from tightening or liquidity shocks
Regulatory actions or infrastructure outages
Concentration in validator economics and competitive displacement
These factors could push AVAX toward lower price prediction scenarios

FAQs: Avalanche Price Prediction

Can AVAX reach $200 according to price predictions?

‍Based on the price prediction scenarios, AVAX could reach $200 in the 31T bear case at $202.49. The 31T tier also shows $261.54 in the base case price forecast and $320.59 in the moon case. Not financial advice.

Can AVAX 10x from current levels based on price predictions?

‍At a current price of $19.62, a 10x would reach $196.20. This falls within the 31T bear, base, and moon case price predictions, and the 23T moon case at $234.56. Bear in mind that 10x returns require substantial market cap expansion. Not financial advice.

Should I buy AVAX now or wait based on price predictions?

‍Timing depends on your risk tolerance and macro outlook. Current price of $19.62 sits below the 8T bear case price prediction at $45.63. Dollar-cost averaging may reduce timing risk. Not financial advice.

What is the 2027 Avalanche price prediction?

‍Based on Token Metrics analysis, the 2027 price prediction for Avalanche centers around $25 in the base case under current market conditions, with a range between $15 and $40 depending on market scenarios. Bullish price predictions range from $54.07 to $320.59 across different total crypto market cap environments.

What drives AVAX price predictions?

‍AVAX price predictions are driven by subnet adoption, DeFi ecosystem growth, developer activity, institutional partnerships, and overall Layer 1 competition. The strong fundamentals (91.63% grade) support long-term price potential, though short-term bearish signals suggest caution. Market-wide crypto conditions remain the primary driver for reaching upper price prediction targets.

Can AVAX reach $300 by 2027?

‍According to our price prediction models, AVAX could reach $300+ in the 31T moon case where it projects to $320.59. This price prediction outcome requires the total crypto market to reach 31 trillion and Avalanche to maintain strong competitive positioning with accelerated subnet adoption. Not financial advice.

Next Steps

Disclosure

Educational purposes only, not financial advice. Crypto is volatile, do your own research and manage risk.

Powered by Token Metrics

Our team delivers scenario-driven price projections, in-depth grades, and actionable indices to empower smarter crypto investing—with both human and AI insights.

Research

Hedera Price Prediction 2027: $0.10-$1.42 Target Analysis

Token Metrics Team

8 min read

Hedera Price Prediction: Portfolio Context for HBAR in the 2027 Landscape

Layer 1 tokens like Hedera represent bets on specific blockchain architectures winning developer and user mindshare. HBAR carries both systematic crypto risk and unsystematic risk from Hedera's technical roadmap execution and ecosystem growth. Multi-chain thesis suggests diversifying across several L1s rather than concentrating in one, since predicting which chains will dominate remains difficult.

The price prediction projections below show how HBAR might perform under different market cap scenarios. While Hedera may have strong fundamentals, prudent portfolio construction balances L1 exposure across Ethereum, competing smart contract platforms, and Bitcoin to capture the sector without overexposure to any single chain's fate.

Disclosure

Educational purposes only, not financial advice. Crypto is volatile, do your own research and manage risk.

How to read this price prediction:

Each band blends cycle analogues and market-cap share math with TA guardrails. Base assumes steady adoption and neutral or positive macro. Moon layers in a liquidity boom. Bear assumes muted flows and tighter liquidity.

TM Agent baseline:

Token Metrics lead metric for Hedera price prediction, cashtag $HBAR, is a TM Grade of 61.8%, which maps to Hold, and the trading signal is bearish, indicating short-term downward momentum. This means Token Metrics views $HBAR as having reasonably solid fundamentals but limited conviction for strong outperformance in the near term.

A concise long-term numeric price prediction view for a 12-month horizon: Token Metrics scenarios center around a range of about $0.06 to $0.18, with a base case price target near $0.10, reflecting steady ecosystem growth, moderate adoption of Hedera services, and continued enterprise partnerships. Implication: if Bitcoin and broader crypto risk appetite improve, $HBAR could revisit the higher end of the price prediction range, while a risk-off market or slower-than-expected developer traction would keep it toward the lower bound.

Token Details

Key Takeaways

Scenario driven, outcomes hinge on total crypto market cap, higher liquidity and adoption lift the bands.
Single-asset concentration amplifies both upside and downside versus diversified approaches.
Fundamentals: Fundamental Grade 81.08% (Community 74%, Tokenomics 100%, Exchange 100%, VC 59%, DeFi Scanner 85%).
Technology: Technology Grade 62.39% (Activity 58%, Repository 68%, Collaboration 74%, Security 56%, DeFi Scanner 85%).
TM Agent gist: bearish short term, range view with upside if crypto risk appetite improves.
Education only, not financial advice.